A constructivist approach is applied to characterizing social embeddedness. Social embeddedness is intended as a strong type of social situatedness. It is defined as the extent to which modeling the behavior of an agent requires the inclusion of other agents as individuals rather than as an undif ferentiated whole. Possible consequences of the presence of social embedding and ways to check for it are discussed. A model of co-developing agents is exhibited which demonstrates the possi bility of social embedding. This is an extension of Brian Arthur's 'El Farol Bar' model, with added learning and communication. Some indicators of social embedding are analyzed and some possi ble causes of social embedding are discussed. It is suggested that social embeddedness may be an explanation of the causal link between the social situatedness of the agent and it employing a con structivist strategy in its modeling.
Akiyama, E. and K. Kaneko, (1996). Evolution of Cooperation, Differentiation, Complexity, and Diversity in an Iterated Three-person Game, Artificial Life, 2, 293-304.
2.
Arthur, B. (1994). Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality. American Economic Association Papers, 84, 406-411.
3.
Bednarz, J.1984. Complexity and Intersubjectivity. Human Studies, 7, 55-70.
4.
Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without Representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
5.
Carley, K. and Newell, A. (1994). The Nature of the Social Agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19, 221-262.
6.
Clancy, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7.
Dautenhahn, K. (1997). I Could Be You: The phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybernetics and Systems, 28, 417-453.
8.
Drescher, G.L. (1991). Made-up Minds - A Constructivist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. Readings from Durkheim. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
10.
Edmonds, B. (forthcoming). Pragmatic Holism. Foundations of Science, 4.
11.
Edmonds, B. (1997). Complexity and Scientific Modeling.20th 20th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria, August 1997
12.
Edmonds, B. (1998). Gossip, Sexual Recombination and the El Farol Bar: modeling the emergence of heterogeneity. Computation in Economics, Finance and Engineering: Economic Systems conference (CEFES'98), June 1998, Cambridge, UK.
Edmonds, B. and S.J. Moss, (1997). Modeling Bounded Rationality using Evolutionary Techniques. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1305, 31-42.
15.
Foerster, E. von (1973). On Constructing a Reality. In Preiser (Ed.) Environmental Research Design , Vol. 2. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 35-46.
16.
Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning . London: The Falmer Press.
17.
Grassé P. P. (1959). La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La theorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interpretation des termites constructeurs. Insect Societies, 6, 41-83.
18.
Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
19.
Kaneko, K. (1990). Globally Coupled Chaos Violates the Law of Large Numbers but not the Central Limit Theorem. Physics Review Letters, 65, 1391-1394
20.
Koza, J.R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Kummer, H., Daston, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Silk, J. (1997). The social intelligence hypothesis. In Weingart et. al (Eds.). Human by Nature: between biology and the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 157-179.
Moss, S.J. and Edmonds, B. (1998). Modeling Economic Learning as Modeling. Cybernetics and Systems, 29, 5-37.
24.
Moss, S.J., Edmonds, B. and Wallis, S. (1997). Validation and Verification of Computational Models with Multiple Cognitive Agents. CPM Report 97-25, MMU, 1997 .
25.
Moss, S.J., H. Gaylard, S. Wallis, and B. Edmonds, (1998). SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modeling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory , 4, 43-69
26.
Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Ballentine.
27.
Riegler, A. (1992). Constructivist Artificial Life and Beyond. Workshop on Autopoiesis and Perception, Dublin City University, Aug. 1992.
28.
Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Vaario, J. (1994). Artificial Life as Constructivist AI. Japanese Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 33, 65-71.
30.
Vera, A.H. and Simon, H.A. (1993). Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7-48.
31.
Wimsatt, W. (1972). Complexity and Organization. In Scavenger and Cohen (Eds.). Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences. Dordrecht: Riddle, 67-86.
32.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
