Comments on the paper “Are altered states of consciousness detrimental,useful or helpful for the origins of symbolic cognition? A response to Hodgson and Lewis Williams”,by T Froese,A Woodward and T Ikegami
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2014
Comments on the paper “Are altered states of consciousness detrimental,useful or helpful for the origins of symbolic cognition? A response to Hodgson and Lewis Williams”,by T Froese,A Woodward and T Ikegami
The purpose of these comments is to correct some mischaracterizations of my work with Paul Bahn that Froese et al. make in their latest paper “Are altered states of consciousness detrimental, useful or helpful for the origins of symbolic cognition? A response to Hodgson and Lewis-Williams”. Additionally I discuss neuropsychological errors occurring in that paper.
BahnP. G.2001. Save the last trance for me: an assessment of the misuse of shamanism in rock art studies, pp. 31–93 In FrancfortH-P.HamayonR. N., eds. In collaboration with BahnP.The Concept of Shamanism. Uses and Abuses (Bibliotheca Shamanistica, vol. 10), Budapest, Akadémaiai Kiado.
2.
BahnP. G. (2010) Prehistoric rock art: polemics and progress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BednarikR. G. (1988) Comments on J. D. Lewis-Williams and T. A. Dowson, “The signs of all times.”Current Anthropology, 29(92), 218–219.
4.
BednarikR. G. (1990) On neuropsychology and shamanism in rock art. Current Anthropology, 31(19), 77–84.
5.
BednarikR. G. (2013) Origins of modern human behavior. In BednarikR. G. (Ed.), The psychology of human behavior. New York: Nova Press.
BradshawJ. L. (2003) An unentrancing idea: Psychedelics and the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 13(2), 216–218
8.
CardeñaE. (1988) The phenomenology of quiescent and physically active deep hypnosis. Abstract. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 227.
9.
CardeñaE. (1996) Just floating on the sky: A comparison of hypnotic and shamanic phenomenon. In van QuekelbergheR.EignerD. (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Transkulturelle Medizin und Psychotherapie, Themenbund: Trance, Besessenheit, Heilrituale und Psychotherapie (pp. 85–98). Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.
10.
FrancfortH.-P.HamayonR. N. (Eds.) in collaboration with BahnP. (2001) The concept of shamanism: Uses and abuses (Bibliotheca Shamanistica, vol. 10). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
11.
FroeseT.WoodwardA.IkegamiT. (2014) Are altered states of consciousness detrimental, neutral or helpful for the origin of symbolic cognition: A response to Hodgson and Lewis-Williams. Adaptive Behavior, 22(1), 89–95.
12.
HamayonR. N. (2001) Shamanism: Symbolic system, human capability and Western ideology. In FrancfortH. P.HamayonR. N. (Eds., with P. G. Bahn), The concept of shamanism: Uses and abuses (pp. 1–31) (Bibliotheca Shamanistica 10). Budapest: Akademai Kiado.
13.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP.G. (2002) Desperately seeking trance plants: Testing the “three stages of trance model”. New York: R. J. Communications LLC.
14.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2003) Testing the “three stages of trance” model. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 13(2), 213–124.
15.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2004) Waking the trance fixed. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 90–100.
16.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2005) Waking the trance fixed. Shelbyville, KY: Wasteland Press.
17.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2006a) Archaeology or mythology? The “three stages of trance” model and South African rock art. In GauthierY.Le QuellecJ-L.SimonisR. (Eds.), Hic sunt leones. Mélanges sahariens en l’honneur d’Alfred Muzzolini (pp. 111–127). Cathiers de l’AARS (Association des Amis de l’ Art Rupestre Saharien), 10.
18.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2006b) Science ou pure spéculation? Réfutation des thèses concernant les hallucinogènes et l’art pariétal paléolithique. In LorblanchetM.. (Eds.), Chamanismes et Arts Préhistoriques, Vision Critique (pp. 52–67). Paris: Editions Errance.
19.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2007) Yes, there is a “shamanism and rock art debate. Before Farming (Online version) 2007/1 article 3.
20.
HelvenstonP.A.HodgsonD. (2010) The neuropsychology of “animism”: Implications for understanding rock art. Rock Art Research, 27(1), 61–94.
21.
HodgsonD. (2000) Art, perception and information processing: An evolutionary perspective. Rock Art Research, 17(1), 3–34.
22.
HodgsonD. (2006a) Altered states of consciousness and palaeoart: An alternative neurovisual explanation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(1), 27–37.
23.
HodgsonD. (2006b) Understanding the origins of paleoart: The neurovisual resonance theory and brain function. Paleoanthropology, 54–67. Available at: http://paleoanthro.org/journal/2006/
24.
HromnikC. A. (1991) Testament to the shamanistic hallucinatory trance theory of the Southern African rock art. Rock Art Research, 8(2), 99–108.
25.
KlüverH. (1928) Mescal the divine plant and its psychological effects. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench Trubner & Co.
26.
KlüverH. (1942) Mechanisms of hallucinations. In McnemarQMerrillM. A. (Eds.), Studies in Personality, Chapter 10. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
KlüverH. (1996) Mescal and mechanisms of hallucinations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Le QuellecJ. L. (1999) Du chamanisme chez les Martiens?Almogaren, XXX, 95–115.
29.
Le QuellecJ. L. (2001) Shamans and Martians: The same struggle! In FrancfortH. P.HamayonR. N. in collaboration with BahnP. G. (Eds.), The concept of shamanism, uses and abuses (pp. 135–159) (Bibliothecca Shamanistica, Vol. 10). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
30.
Le QuellecJ. L. (2004) Rock art in Africa: Mythology and legend. Paris: Flammarion.
31.
LudwigA. M. (1968) Altered states of consciousness. In PrinceR. (Ed.), Trance and possession states. In Proceedings Second Annual Conference R. M. Bucke Memorial Society (pp. 69–95). Montreal, Canada: R. M. Bucke Memorial Society.
32.
MerabetL. B.MaguireD.WardeA.AlterescuK.StickgoldR.Pascual-LeoneA. (2004). Visual hallucinations during prolonged blindfolding in sighted subjects. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology24(2), 109–113.
33.
RouhierA. (1927) La plante qui fait les yeux émerveillè le peyotl (Echinoccactus williamsii L) (pp. xii, 371). Paris: Doin.
34.
SacksO. (2013) Hallucinations. New York: Vintage Books.
35.
SolomonA. (1997) The myth of ritual origins? Ethnography, mythology and interpretation of San rock art. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 52, 3–13.
36.
SolomonA. (1999) Meanings, models and minds: A reply to Lewis-Williams. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 54, 51–60.
37.
SolomonA. (2001) What is an explanation? Belief and cosmology in interpretations of Southern San rock art in Southern Africa. In FrancfortH. P.HamayonR. N. in collaboration with BahnP. G. (Eds.), The concept of shamanism, uses and abuses (Bibliotheca Shamanistica, Volume 10) (pp. 161–178). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
38.
WilsonD. (2004) People talk about heaven. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 86–89.
39.
ZubekJ. P.PushcarD.SansomW.GowingJ. (1961) Perceptual changes after prolonged sensory isolation (darkness and silence). Canadian Journal of Psychology (Abstract), 15(2), 83–100.
