Organisms across species use the strategy of generating structures in their environment to lower cognitive complexity. Examples include pheromones, markers, color codes, etc. We provide a model of how such structures originate, and present a simulation where organisms with only reactive behavior learn, within their lifetime, to add such structures to their world to lower cognitive load. This implementation is then extended to show that the same underlying process could generate internal traces of the world (memories) in an internal environment. This model provides a novel account of the origin of internal representations. Further, as both external and internal traces are generated using the same mechanism, the model shows how an extended mind could be implemented. Also, as the stored internal traces develop entirely out of actions, these action components could be activated implicitly. This feature explains the origin of enactable and action-oriented mental content, suggested by recent experiments.
Beer, R.D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11, 209—243.
5.
Bergen, B., Chang, N., & Narayan, S. (2004). Simulated action in an embodied construction grammar . In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (1996). Why culture is common but cultural revolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy , 88, 73—93.
8.
Bradbury, J.W., & Vehrencamp, S.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication . Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates .
9.
Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 489—495.
10.
Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139—159.
11.
Buason, G., Bergfeldt, N., & Ziemke, T. (2005). Brains, bodies and beyond: Competitive co-evolution of robot controllers, morphologies and environments. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 6, 25—51.
12.
Camazine, S. (1991). Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology , 28, 61—76.
13.
Chandrasekharan, S. (2005). Epistemic structure: An inquiry into how agents change the world for cognitive congeniality. Ph.D. dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved 5 December 2006 from http://www.carleton.ca/iis/TechReports/files/2005-02.pdf
14.
Chandrasekharan, S. (2006). Money as epistemic structure. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 29, 183—184.
15.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7—19.
16.
Clark, A., & Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7, 5—16.
17.
Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese , 101, 401—431.
18.
Curio, E. (1976). The ethology of predation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
Dennett, D. (1975). Why the law of effect will not go away. Journal of the Theory ofSocial Behaviour, 5, 179—187.
20.
Dennett, D., & Haugeland, J. (1987). Intentionality. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3—71.
22.
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29, 737—767.
23.
Gallese, V., Ferrari, P.F., Kohler, E., & Fogassi, L. (2002). The eyes, the hand and the mind: Behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of social cognition. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & M. Burghardt (Eds.), The cognitive animal (pp. 451— 462). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Godfrey-Smith, P.G. (1994). Complexity and the function of mind in nature . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Griffiths, D.P., Dickinson, A., & Clayton, N.S. (1999). Declarative and episodic memory: What can animals remember about their past? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 74—80.
27.
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 27, 377—442.
28.
Guilford, T., Roberts, S., & Biro, D. (2004). Positional entropy during pigeon homing II: Navigational interpretation of Bayesian latent state models. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 227, 25—38.
29.
Henry, J.D. (1977). The use of urine marking in the scavenging behaviour of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Behaviour, 62, 82—105.
30.
Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 242— 247.
31.
Hills, T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3—41.
32.
Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (2005). Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vols 1—2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265—288.
35.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201— 208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Kart-Teke, E., De Souza Silva, M.A., Huston, J.P., & Dere, E. (2006). Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences. Neuorbiology of Learning and Memory, 85, 173—182.
37.
Kirby, S. (2002). Natural language from artificial life. Artificial Life, 8, 185—215.
38.
Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31—68.
39.
Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 415—452.
40.
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action . Cognitive Science, 18, 513—549.
41.
Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, F.J., & Feldmann, M.W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 23, 131—175.
42.
Mandik, P., & Clark, A. (2002). Selective representing and world making. Minds and Machines, 12, 383—395.
43.
Metzinger, T., & Gallese, V. (2003). The emergence of a shared action ontology: Building blocks for a theory. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 549—571.
44.
Miller, M., & Wehner, R. (1988). Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 85, 5287—5290.
45.
Millikan, R.G. (1993). White Queen psychology and other essays forAlice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
46.
Millikan, R.G. (1996). Pushmi—pullyu representations. In L. May & M. Friedman (Eds.), Mind and morals (pp. 145— 161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Nakamura, M., & Kurumatani, K. (1996). Formation mechanism of pheromone pattern and control of foraging behavior in an ant colony model . In C. G. Langton and K. Shimohara, (Eds.), Artificial life V: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Nara, Japan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Nichols, S., Stich, S., Leslie, A., & Klein, D. (1996). Varieties of off-line simulation. In P. Carruthers & P. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 39—74). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Odling-Smee, F.J., Laland, K.N., & Feldman, M.W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Seth, A.K. (2002). Agent-based modelling and the environmental complexity thesis. In B. Hallam, D. Floreano, J. Hallam, G. Heyes, & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), From animals to animats 7: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 13—24). Edinburgh, UK. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Silberman, S. (2003). The bacteria whisperer. Wired , (April), 104—108.
53.
Sipper, M. (2001). On the origin of environments by means of natural selection. AI Magazine, 22 (4), 133—140.
54.
Smolensky, P. (1989). Connectionist modeling: Neural computation/mental connections. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover , & R. M. Harnish (Eds.), Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 49—67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
Steels, L., & Belpaeme, T. (2005). Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 469—529.
56.
Sterelny, K. (2005). Made by each other: Organisms and their environment . Biology and Philosophy, 20, 21—36.
57.
Sterelny, K. (2006). Cognitive load and human decision, or, three ways of rolling the rock uphill. In S. Stich, S. Laurence, & P. Carruthers (Eds.), The innate mind: Culture and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
58.
Stewart, T.C. (2001). Extrema selection: Accelerated evolution on neutral networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2001. Seoul, Korea. New York: IEEE Press.
59.
Stewart, T., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2005). Two cognitive descriptions of Q-learning. Carleton University Cognitive Science Technical Report. Retrieved 5 December 2006 from http://www.carleton.ca/iis/TechReports/files/2005-03.pdf.
60.
Stopka, P., & Macdonald, D.W. (2003). Way-marking behavior: An aid to spatial navigation in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus). BMCEcology, 3 (3).
61.
Susi, T., & Ziemke, T. (2001). Social cognition, artifacts, and stigmergy: A comparative analysis of theoretical frameworks for the understanding of artifact-mediated collaborative activity. Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 273—290.
62.
Svenson, H., & Ziemke, T. (2004). Making sense of embodiment: Simulation theories and the sharing of neural circuitry between sensorimotor and cognitive processes . In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Tani, J., & Nolfi, S. (1999). Learning to perceive the world as articulated: An approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems. Neural Networks, 12, 1131—1141.
64.
Tesfatsion, L. (2002). Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up. Artificial Life, 8, 55—82.
65.
Todd, P.M., & Miller, G.F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Realistic heuristics for mate search. In G. Gigerenzer , P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287—308). New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
67.
van Dartel, M.F. (2005). Situated rrepresentation. Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
68.
van Dartel, M.F., Postma, E.O., van den Herik, H.J., & de Croon, G. (2004). Macroscopic analysis of robot foraging behaviour. ConnectionScience, 16, 169—181.
69.
Watkins, C. (1989). Learning from delayed rewards. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK.
70.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
Ziemke, T., Bergfeldt, N., Buason, G., Susi, T., & Svensson, H. (2004). Evolving cognitive scaffolding and environment adaptation: A new research direction for evolutionary robotics. Connection Science, 16, 339—350.
