Dynamicism has provided cognitive science with important tools to understand some aspects of “how cognitive agents work” but the issue of “what makes something cognitive” has not been sufficiently addressed yet and, we argue, the former will never be complete without the latter. Behavioristic characterizations of cognitive properties are criticized in favor of an organizational approach focused on the internal dynamic relationships that constitute cognitive systems. A definition of cognition as adaptive-autonomy in the embodied and situated neurodynamic domain is provided: the compensatory regulation of a web of stability dependencies between sensorimotor structures is created and pre served during a historical/developmental process. We highlight the functional role of emotional embodiment: internal bioregulatory processes coupled to the formation and adaptive regulation of neurodynamic autonomy. Finally, we discuss a “minimally cognitive behavior program” in evolutionary simulation modeling suggesting that much is to be learned from a complementary “minimally cognitive organization program”
Bechara, A. (2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage . Brain and Cognition, 55, 30-40 .
2.
Beer, R. D. (1996). Toward the evolution of dynamical neural networks for minimally cognitive behaviour . In P. Maes , M. Mataric , J. A. Meyer , J. Pollack , & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour (pp. 421-429 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Beer, R. D. (1997). The Dynamics of Adaptive Behavior: A research program . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20, 257-289 .
4.
Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent . Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 209-243 .
5.
Bickhard, M. H. (2000). Autonomy, Function, and Representation . Communication and Cognition - Artificial Intelligence, 17(3-4), 111-131 .
6.
Bressler, S. , & Kelso, J. (2001). Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition . Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 26-36 .
7.
Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation . Artificial Intelligence Journal, 47, 139-160 .
8.
Chiel, H. , & Beer, R. (1997). The brain has a body . Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 553-557 .
9.
Christensen, W. , & Bickhard, M. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function . Monist, 85(1), 3-28 .
10.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
11.
Clark, A. , & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing?Synthese, 101, 401-431 .
12.
Collier, J. (1999). Autonomy and process closure as the basis for functionality. In G. Chandler & J. L. R. van deVijver (Eds.), Closure: Emergent Organizations and their Dynamics. Volume 901 of the New York Academy of Sciences.
13.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error, emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam’s Sons .
14.
Di Paolo, E. (2000). Homeostatic adaptation to inversion of the visual field and other sensorimotor disruptions . In J.-A. Meyer , A. Berthoz , D. Floreano , H. Roitblat , & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 440-449 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Di Paolo, E. (2003). Organismically inspired robotics. In K. Murase & T. Asakura (Eds.), Dynamical systems approach to embodiment and sociality (pp. 19-42). Adelaide, Australia: Advanced Knowledge International .
16.
Di Paolo, E. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency . Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.
17.
Edelman, G. (1989). The remembered present. Basic Books .
18.
Edelman, G. , & Tononi, G. (2000). Consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. Penguin Books .
19.
Floreano, D. , & Urzelai, J. (2000). Evolutionary robots with online self-organization and behavioural fitness . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 13, 431-443 .
20.
Freeman, J. , & Skarda, C. (1990). Representations: Who needs them? In J. McGaugh , N. Weinberger , & G. Lynch (Eds.), Brain organization and memory cells, systems, and circuits (pp. 375-380).
21.
Friston, K. (2000). The labile brain. I. neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling . Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 355, 215-236 .
22.
Funahashi, K. , & Nakamura, Y. (1993). Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks . Neural Networks, 6, 1-64 .
23.
Husbands, P. , Harvey, I. , Cliff, D. , & Miller, G. (1997). Artificial evolution: A new path for artificial intelligence?Brain and Cognition, 34, 130-159 .
24.
Husbands, P. , Smith, T. , Jakobi, N. , & O’Shea, M. (1998). Better living through chemistry: Evolving GasNets for robot control . Connection Science, 10(3-4), 185-210 .
25.
Jonas, H. (1966, 2001). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press .
26.
Kampis, G. (1991). Self-modifying systems in biology and cognitive science: A new framework for dynamics, information and complexity. Oxford: Pergamon Press .
27.
Kauffman, S. (2001). Investigations. Oxford University Press .
28.
Keijzer, F. (2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
29.
Kelso, J. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
30.
Lewis, M. D. (2005). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 169-194 .
31.
Maturana, H. , & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis. The realization of the living. In H. Maturana & F. Varela (Eds.), Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living (pp. 73-138). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel .
32.
McGregor, S. , & Fernando, C. (2005). Levels of description: A novel approach to dynamical hierarchies . Artificial Life, 11(4), 459-472 .
33.
Millikan, R. G. (1989). Biosemantics . Journal of Philosophy, 86(6), 281-297 .
34.
Moreno, A. , & Lasa, A. (2003). From basic adaptivity to early mind . Evolution and Cognition, 9(1), 12-24 .
35.
Nolfi, S. , & Floreano, D. (2000). Evolutionary robotics: The biology, intelligence and technology of self-organizing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
Pattee, H. (1977). Dynamic and linguistic modes of complex systems . International Journal of General Systems, 3, 259-266 .
38.
Port, R. , & van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
39.
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself - A comprehensive enquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press .
40.
Rosenblueth, A. , Wiener, N. , & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology . Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18-24 .
41.
Ruiz-Mirazo, K. , & Moreno, A. (2000). Searching for the roots of autonomy: The natural and artificial paradigms revisited . Artificial Intelligence, 17(3-4), 209-228 .
42.
Ruiz-Mirazo, K. , & Moreno, A. (2004). Basic Autonomy as a fundamental step in the synthesis of life . Artificial Life, 10, 235-259 .
43.
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-458 .
44.
Seth, A. , & Edelman, G. (2004). Environment and behavior influence the complexity of evolved neural networks . Adaptive Behavior, 12(1), 5-21 .
45.
Skarda, C. , & Freeman, W. (1987). How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 161-195 .
46.
Stewart, J. (1996). Cognition=life. Implication for higher-level cognition . Behavioral Processes, 35, 311-326 .
47.
Thelen, E. , & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
48.
Tononi, G. , Edelman, G. , & Sporns, O. (1998). Complexity and coherency: Integrating information in the brain . Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 474-484 .
49.
Turing, A. M. (1988). Computing machinery and intelligence. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 6-19). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann .
50.
van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science . Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 615-665 .
51.
von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning . Semiotica, 42(1), 25-82 .
52.
Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: North-Holland .
53.
Varela, F. , Lachaux, J. , Rodriguez, E. , & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration . Nature Reviews on Neuroscience, 2, 229-239 .
54.
Varela, F. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
55.
Ziemke, T. (2003). What’s that thing called embodiment? In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
