Work on minimal cognition raises a variety of questions concerning the boundaries of cognition. Many discussions of minimal cognition assume that the domain of minimal cognition is a subset of the domain of the living. In this article, I consider whether non-living ‘active materials’ ought to be included as instances of minimal cognition. I argue that seeing such cases as ‘minimal models’ of (minimal) cognition requires recognising them as members of a class of systems sharing the same basic features and exhibiting the same general patterns of behaviour. Minimal cognition in this sense is a very inclusive concept: rather than specifying some threshold level of cognition or a type of cognition found only in very simple systems, it is a concept of cognition associated with very minimal criteria that pick out only the most essential requirements for a system to exhibit cognitive behaviour.
AizawaK. (2017). Cognition and behavior. Synthese, 194, 4269–4288.
2.
BattermanR. W. (2000). Multiple realizability and universality. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 51, 115–145.
3.
BattermanR. W.RiceC. C. (2014). Minimal model explanations. Philosophy of Science, 81(3), 349–376.
4.
BishopR. C. (2008). Downward causation in fluid convection. Synthese, 160(2), 229–248.
5.
BruguésJ.NeedlemanD. (2014). Physical basis of spindle self-organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(52), 18496–18500.
6.
CavagnaA.GiardinaI.GrigeraT. S. (2018). The physics of flocking: Correlation as a compass from experiments to theory. Physics Reports, 728, 1–62.
7.
ChalmersD. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In ClaytonP.DaviesP. (Eds.), The Reemergence of Emergence (pp. 244–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ChirimuutaM. (2014). Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience. Synthese, 191, 127–153.
9.
De MagistrisG.MarenduzzoD. (2015). An introduction to the physics of active matter. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 418, 65–77.
10.
di PrimioF.MüllerB. S.LengelerJ. W. (2000). Minimal cognition in unicellular organisms [Paper presentation]. SAB2000 Proceedings Supplement: Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Paris, France.
11.
GarzónP. C.KeijzerF. (2009). Cognition in plants. In BaluškaF. (Ed.), Plant-environment interactions (pp. 247–266). Springer.
12.
GoldenfeldN. (1992). Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group (Frontiers in physics 85). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
GoldenfeldN.KadanoffL. P. (1999). Simple lessons from complexity. Science, 284(5411), 87–89.
HanczycM. M.ToyotaT.IkegamiT.PackardN.SugawaraT. (2007). Fatty acid chemistry at the oil-water interface: Self-propelled oil droplets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(30), 9386–9391.
16.
JansonS.MiddendorfM.BeekmanM. (2006). Searching for a new home – Scouting behavior of honeybee swarms. Behavioral Ecology, 18(2), 384–392.
17.
LagziI.SohS.WessonP. J.BrowneK. P.GrzybowskiB. A. (2010). Maze solving by chemotactic droplets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 132(4), 1198–1199.
18.
LyonP. (2006). The biogenic approach to cognition. Cognitive Processes, 7, 11–29.
19.
LyonP. (2015). The cognitive cell: Bacterial behavior reconsidered. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 264.
20.
MarchettiM. C.JoannyJ. F.RamaswamyS.LiverpoolT. B.ProstJ.RaoM.SimhaR. A. (2013). Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(3), 1143.
21.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. D. Reidel.
22.
MenonG. I. (2010). Active matter. In Murali KrishnanJ.DeshpandeA.KumarP. B. (Eds.), Rheology of complex fluids (pp. 193–218). Springer.
23.
NeedlemanD.DogicZ. (2017). Active matter at the interface between materials science and cell biology. Nature Reviews Materials, 2(9), 17048.
24.
NishiguchiD.IwasawaJ.JiangH. R.SanoM. (2018). Flagellar dynamics of chains of active Janus particles fueled by an AC electric field. New Journal of Physics, 20(1), 015002.
25.
PopescuM. N.UspalW. E.BechingerC.FischerP. (2018). Chemotaxis of active Janus nanoparticles. Nano Letters, 18(9), 5345–5349.
26.
PopkinG. (2016, January). The physics of life. Nature News, 529(7584), 16–18.
27.
ProsserS. L.PelletierL. (2017). Mitotic spindle assembly in animal cells: A fine balancing act. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 18(3), 187–201.
28.
RamaswamyS. (2017). Active matter. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2017(5), 054002.
29.
RamseyW. (2017). Must cognition be representational?Synthese, 194, 4197–4214.
30.
ReynoldsA. M. (2010). Maze-solving by chemotaxis. Physical Review E, 81(6), 062901.
31.
SchweitzerF.TilchB.EbelingW. (2000). Uphill motion of active Brownian particles in piecewise linear potentials. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 14(1), 157–168.
32.
ShapiroL. A. (2013). Dynamics and cognition. Minds and Machines, 23, 353–375.
VallverdúJ.CastroO.MayneR.TalanovM.LevinM.BaluškaF.GunjiY.DussutourA.ZenilH.AdamatzkyA. (2018). Slime mould: The fundamental mechanisms of biological cognition. BioSystems, 165, 57–70.
35.
van DuijnM.KeijzerF.FrankenD. (2006). Principles of minimal cognition: Casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adaptive Behavior, 14(2), 157–170.
36.
VicsekT.CzirókA.Ben-JacobE.CohenI.ShochetO. (1995). Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters, 75(6), 1226–1229.
37.
WeisbergM. (2012). Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford University Press.
