BankinsS.GriepY.HansenS. D. (2020). Charting directions for a new research era: Addressing gaps and advancing scholarship in the study of psychological contracts. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1737219
2.
EronenM. I.BringmannL. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970586
3.
ForresterJ. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory and Decision, 2(2), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148991
4.
GieselerK.LoschelderD. D.FrieseM. (2019). What makes for a good theory? How to evaluate a theory using the strength model of self-control as an example. In SassenbergK.VliekM. (Eds.), Social psychology in action (pp. 3–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1
GriepY. (2022). Capturing the process of academic commitment: A taxonomy and test of post-secondary student academic commitment trajectories. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(6), 1900–1915. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1967886
7.
GriepY.ZacherH. (2021). Temporal dynamics in organizational psychology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press.
8.
HausknechtJ. P.SturmanM. C.RobersonQ. M. (2011). Justice as a dynamic construct: Effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 872–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022991
9.
MeadowsD. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
NavarroJ.RoeR. A.ArtilesM. I. (2015). Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in work/organizational psychology. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 31(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.07.002
12.
ScheelA. M.TiokhinL.IsagerP. M.LakensD. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
13.
StermanJ. (2000). Business dynamics—systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
14.
UrionaM.GrobbelaarS. S. (2019). Innovation system policy analysis through system dynamics modelling: A systematic review. Science and Public Policy, 46(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy034
15.
Van DoornJ.VerhoefP. C.BijmoltT. H. A. (2007). The importance of non-linear relationships between attitude and behaviour in policy research. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-007-9028-3
16.
Van RooijI.BaggioG. (2020). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970604
17.
VergauweJ.WilleB.HofmansJ.KaiserR. B.De FruytF. (2018). The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000147
18.
WolstenholmeE. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.259
19.
YarkoniT.WestfallJ. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393