This research studied changes in theory building and testing levels, reported in 668 articles published in three leading Human Resource Development (HRD) journals in years 2000 to 2017. Using a modified taxonomy of theory building research, we found evidence to suggest that the trajectory of theory building and testing efforts in HRD suggests that the field has reached a stage of a mature discipline. The study has found that some types of research have become less important as the discipline matured (e.g., Reporters, or articles reporting observation of phenomena) or remain stable (Modifiers of existing theories), whereas others steadily grow in importance (theory Builders and Expanders). Correlating the results of citation analysis with types of articles, we found that articles that propose and test new theoretical constructs at the same time, or those that expand new theories, enjoy significantly higher levels of citations, compared with articles that report observations of practice or duplicate earlier studies.
AgarwalR.HoetkerG. (2007). A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1304-1322. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.28165901
2.
AguinisH.DaltonD. R.BoscoF. A.PierceC. A.DaltonC. M. (2010). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37(1), 5-38. doi:10.1177/0149206310377113
3.
AlasuutariP. (2010). The rise and relevance of qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 139-155. doi:10.1080/13645570902966056
4.
AmabileT. M.ContiR.CoonH.LazenbyJ.HerronM. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184. doi:10.5465/256995
5.
BacharachS. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515. doi:10.2307/258555
6.
BagozziR. P.PhillipsL. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489. doi:10.2307/2392322
7.
BarleyS. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16-20. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785495
8.
BartkoJ. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 3-11. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
9.
BartunekJ. M.RynesS. L.IrelandR. D.BartunekJ. M.RynesS. L.IrelandR. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9-15. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785494
10.
BatesR.HoltonE. F.HatalaJ. P. (2012). A revised learning transfer system inventory: Factorial replication and validation. Human Resource Development International, 15, 549-569. doi:10.1080/13678868.2012.726872
11.
BelleS. M.BurleyD. L.LongS. D. (2015). Where do I belong? High-intensity teleworkers’ experience of organizational belonging. Human Resource Development International, 18, 76-96. doi:10.1080/13678868.2014.979006
12.
ChenH. C.HoltonE. F.BatesR. (2005). Development and validation of the learning transfer system inventory in Taiwan. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(1), 55-84. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1124
13.
CoatesT. K. L. (2017). Hearing the voices of Generation Y employees: A hermeneutic phenomenological study. Human Resource Development International, 20, 37-67. doi:10.1080/13678868.2016.1222486
14.
ColquittJ. A.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2007). Trend in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of theAcademy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Review, 50, 1281-1303. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28165855
15.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12-32. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0486
16.
CorleyK. G.SchinoffB. S. (2017). Who, me? An inductive study of novice experts in theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(1), 4-27. doi:10.5465/amp.2015.0131
17.
DiMaggioP. J. (1995). Comments on “what theory is not.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 391-397. doi:10.2307/2393790
18.
DubinR. (1978). Theory building (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
EhrhardtK.MillerJ. S.FreemanS. J.HomP. W. (2011). An examination of the relationship between training comprehensiveness and organizational commitment: Further exploration of training perceptions and employee attitudes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 459-489. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20086
20.
FenwickT. J. (2004). Toward a critical HRD in theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 54, 193-209. doi:10.1177/0741713604263051
21.
FinkJ. S. (2013). Theory development in sport management: My experience and other considerations. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 17-21. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.005
22.
GaravanT. N. (1991). Strategic human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 15(1), 17-30.
23.
GaravanT. N.GunnigleP.MorleyM. (2000). Contemporary HRD research: A triarchy of theoretical perspectives and their prescriptions for HRD. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, 65-93. doi:10.1108/03090590010321926
24.
GaravanT. N.O’DonnellD.McGuireD.WatsonS. (2007). Exploring perspectives on human resource development: An introduction. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(1), 3-10. doi:10.1177/1523422306294342
25.
GhoshR.KimM.KimS.CallahanJ. (2014). Examining the dominant, emerging, and waning themes featured in select HRD publications. European Journal of Training and Development, 38, 302-322. doi:10.1108/EJTD-02-2013-0012
26.
HambrickD. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346-1352. doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119
27.
HamlinB.StewartJ. (2011). What is HRD? A definitional review and synthesis of the HRD domain. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35, 199-220. doi:10.1108/03090591111120377
28.
HanS. H.ChaeC.HanS. J.YoonS. W. (2017). Conceptual organization and identity of HRD: Analyses of evolving definitions, influence, and connections. Human Resource Development Review, 16, 294-319. doi:10.1177/1534484317719822
29.
HarzingA. W. K.Van der WalR. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis?Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 62-71. doi:10.3354/esep00076
30.
HarzingA. W. K.Van der WalR. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46. doi:10.1002/asi.20953
31.
HoltonE. F. (1999). What does applied field really mean?Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 301-304.
32.
JaccardJ.JacobyJ. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
JeungC.YoonH. J.ParkS.JoS. J. (2011). The contributions of human resource development research across disciplines : A citation and content analysis. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 87-109. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20062
34.
KacmarK. M.WhitfieldJ. M. (2000). An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 392-406. doi:10.1177/109442810034005
35.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. doi:10.5465/256287
36.
KenworthyT. P.SparksJ. R. (2016). A scientific realism perspective on scientific progress in marketing: An analysis of theory testing in marketing’s major journals. European Management Journal, 34, 466-474. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.012
37.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155-163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
38.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
LandersR. N. (2015). Computing intraclass correlations (ICC) as estimates of interrater reliability in SPSS. The Winnower, 2, e143518.81744. doi:10.15200/winn.143518.81744
40.
LeeM. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4, 327-341. doi:10.1080/13678860110059348
41.
LynhamS. A. (2002a). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 221-241. doi:10.1177/1523422302043002
42.
LynhamS. A. (2002b). Quantitative research and theory building: Dubin’s method. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 242-276. doi:10.1177/15222302004003003
43.
McGoldrickJ.StewartJ.WatsonS. (2010). Theorizing human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 4, 343-356. doi:10.1080/13678860110059393
44.
McLeanG. N. (1998). HRD: A three-legged stool, an octopus, or a centipede?Human Resource Development International, 1, 375-377. doi:10.1080/13678869800000048
45.
McLeanG. N.McLeanL. (2001). If we can’t define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?Human Resource Development International, 4, 313-326. doi:10.1080/13678860110059339
46.
MeyerJ. P.GagneM. (2008). Employee engagement from a self-determination theory perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 60-62. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00010.x
47.
MintzbergH. (2005). Developing theory about the development of theory. In SmithK. G.HittM. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 355-372). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
NerurS. P.RasheedA. A.NatarajanV. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-336. doi:10.1002/smj.659
49.
RaiH.SinghM. (2013). A study of mediating variables of the relationship between 360° feedback and employee performance. Human Resource Development International, 16, 56-73. doi:10.1080/13678868.2012.740797
50.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110. doi:10.1177/0894486511406427
51.
RuonaW. E. A. (2016). Evolving human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 551-565. doi:10.1177/1523422316660968
52.
RuonaW. E. A.SwansonR. A. (1998). Foundations of human resource development. In StewartB. R.HallH. C. (Eds.), Beyond tradition: Preparing HRD educators for tomorrow’s workforce (pp. 1-31). Columbia, MO: University Council for Workforce and Human Resource Education.
53.
RustR. T. (2006). From the editor: The maturation of marketing as an academic discipline. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 1-2. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.3.1
54.
SandersonM. (2008). Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1184-1190. doi:10.1002/asi.20771
55.
ShearM. K.Vander BiltJ.RucciP.EndicottJ.LydiardB.OttoM. W.FrankD. M. (2001). Reliability and validity of a structured interview guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A). Depression and Anxiety, 13, 166-178. doi:10.1002/da.1033.abs
56.
ShrivastavaP. (1987). Rigor and practical usefulness of research in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 77-92. doi:10.1002/smj.4250080107
57.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
58.
SmithK. G.HittM. A. (2005). Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
SmithR. (1990). The dictionary for human resource development. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
60.
SnowC. C.ThomasJ. B. (1994). Field research methods in strategic management: Contributions to theory building and testing. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 457-480. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00626.x
61.
SoaneE.TrussC.AlfesK.ShantzA.ReesC.GatenbyM. (2012). Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: The ISA Engagement Scale. Human Resource Development International, 15, 529-547. doi:10.1080/13678868.2012.726542
62.
SuttonR. I.StawB. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384. doi:10.2307/2393788
63.
SwansonR. A. (1995). Human resource development : Performance is the key. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6, 207-213. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920060208
64.
SwansonR. A. (1999). HRD theory, real or imagined?Human Resource Development International, 2(1), 2-5. doi:10.1080/13678869900000002
65.
SwansonR. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4, 299-312. doi:10.1080/13678860110059311
66.
SwansonR. A.ChermackT. J. (2013). Theory building in applied disciplines. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
67.
TanskyJ. W.CohenD. J. (2001). The relationship between organizational support, employee development, and organizational commitment: An empirical study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 285-300. doi:10.1002/hrdq.15
68.
TorracoR. J. (2002). Research methods for theory building in applied disciplines: A comparative analysis. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 355-376. doi:10.1177/1523422302043008
69.
TorracoR. J. (2004). Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 171-188. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1097
70.
TurnbullS. (2002a). Preface. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 219-220.
71.
TurnbullS. (2002b). Social construction research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 317-334. doi:10.1177/1523422302043006
72.
TurnerJ. R.BakerR.KellnerF. (2018). Theoretical literature review : Tracing the life cycle of a theory and its verified and falsified statements. Human Resource Development Review, 17(1), 34-61. doi:10.1177/1534484317749680
73.
Van de VenA. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 486-489. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308370
74.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75.
WeberR. (2012). Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 1-30. doi:10.17705/1jais.00284
76.
WeinbergerL. A. (1998). Commonly held theories of human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 1(1), 75-93. doi:10.1080/13678869800000009
77.
WhettenD. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371
78.
WoodG.SellaR. (2000). Making human resource development work: A case study on internal training within the Eastern Cape textile industry, South Africa. Human Resource Development International, 3, 451-464. doi:10.1080/713767871
79.
YadavM. S. (2010). The decline of conceptual articles and implications for knowledge development. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 1-19. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.1
