Time for Thymol – Let’s Flush out the Chronic Parasites in Peer-Review

Alberts B. Hanson B. Kelner K. L. (2008). Reviewing peer review. Science, 321(5885), 15. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162115

Canavan G. (2023). Joel and Ellie's excellent adventure: The Last of Us as franchise. Science Fiction Film & Television, 16(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2023.18, https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/909251

Cruz K. S. Zagenczyk T. J. Griep Y. (2022). (Re) introducing a new section generally and a special section in this issue specifically: GOMusings. Group & Organization Management, 47(5), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221117436

DeLisi L. E. (2022). Where have all the reviewers gone? Is the peer review concept in crisis? Psychiatry Research, 310, 114454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114454

Ellinger A. D. Jonsson P. Chapman K. Ellinger A. E. (2023). The ideal review process is a three-way street. Human Resource Development Review, 22(2), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231170030

Ellwanger J. H. Chies J. A. B. (2020). We need to talk about peer-review—experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 125, 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001

Flaherty C. (2022). The peer-review crisis. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/06/13/peer-review-crisis-creates-problems-journals-and-scholars

Gorin M. A. (2023). Combating reviewer fatigue with carrots. BJUI compass, 4(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.207

Griep Y. (2022). Greetings from the new editor: Directions for group & organization management. Group & Organization Management, 47(6), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221115980

Jarrow G. (2022). American murderer: The parasite that haunted the South. Astra Publishing House.

Kerr S. (1995). An academy classic on the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1995.9503133466

Larivière V. Haustein S. Mongeon P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One, 10(6), Article e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lindebaum D. Jordan P. J. (2023). Publishing more than reviewing? Some ethical musings on the sustainability of the peer review process. Organization, 30(2), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211051047

McMullen J. S. Newbert S. L. (2023). Investing in yourself by investing in the field: The long-term benefits of reviewing. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(2), 106284.

Petrescu M. Krishen A. S. (2022). The evolving crisis of the peer-review process. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(3), 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-022-00176-5

Treviño L. K. (Ed.), (2008). Editor's comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility (33, pp. 8–10). Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27744831

Vesper I. (2018). Peer reviewers unmasked: Largest global survey reveals trends. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06602-y

Walter P. Mullins D. (2019). From symbiont to parasite: The evolution of for-profit science publishing. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 30(20), 2537–2542. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147

Warne V. (2016). Rewarding reviewers–sense or sensibility? A wiley study explained. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1002

Zaharie M. A. Osoian C. L. (2016). Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach. European Management Journal, 34(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.004

Zaharie M. A. Seeber M. (2018). Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1587–1609.