Trust and emotion have been among the most influential and frequently studied constructs in organizational behavior over the last two decades. Although emotion would seem to be integral to interpersonal trust, it has played a minor part in the literature. This article is intended to advance understanding of emotion’s role in shaping trust judgments to help bring this concept into the central conversation on trust within organizations. Our paper begins with a review of existing research to help understand how emotion fits within the nomological network of trust and to identify some of the key insights from empirical research. The review suggests emotion impacts trust in two fundamentally different ways, based on independent streams of research, by how it is experienced as a trustor and expressed by the trustee. We provide a conceptual model that integrates these different perspectives as well as brings in key ideas which are absent from research on organizational trust: (a) using a validated and more sophisticated model of trust and trustworthiness will add greater insight into how emotion impacts trust, (b) experienced and expressed emotions jointly and interactively affect trust, (c) trust and emotion operate at multiple levels of analysis, including dyadic and network, and (d) trust and emotion change over time as a function of each other. We conclude that there is much opportunity for future research on trust and emotion, and suggest future directions.
AlligerG. M.WilliamsK. J. (1993). Using signal-contingent experience sampling methodology to work in the field: A discussion and illustration examining task perceptions and mood. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00883.x
2.
BagdasarovZ. B.ConnellyS.JohnsonJ. F. (2019). Denial and empathy: Partners in employee trust repair?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00019
3.
BallingerG. A.SchoormanF. D.LehmanD. W. (2009). Will you trust your new boss? The role of affective reactions to leadership succession. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.012
4.
BelkinL. Y.RothmanN. B. (2017). Do I trust you? Depends on what you feel: Interpersonal effects of emotions on initial trust at zero‐acquaintance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12088
5.
BowerG. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 31–53). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
6.
CampagnaR. L.MislinA. A.KongD. T.BottomW. P. (2016). Strategic consequences of emotional misrepresentation in negotiation: The blowback effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000072
7.
CampelloneT. R.KringA. M. (2013). Who do you trust? The impact of facial emotion and behavior on decision making. Cognition & Emotion, 27(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.726608
8.
ChenM. J.AyokoO. B. (2012). Conflict and trust: The mediating effects of emotional arousal and self‐conscious emotions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(1), 19–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061211199313
9.
CheshinA.AmitA.van KleefG. A. (2018). The interpersonal effects of emotion intensity in customer service: Perceived appropriateness and authenticity of attendants' emotional displays shape customer trust and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.10.002
10.
ChuaR. Y. J.IngramP.MorrisM. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625956
11.
ChuaR. Y. J.MorrisM. W.IngramP. (2009). Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect-and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400422
12.
ColquittJ. A.LePineJ. A.PiccoloR. F.ZapataC. P.RichB. L. (2012). Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025208
13.
ConwayN.BrinerR. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.139
14.
CôtéS.HidegI.van KleefG. A. (2013). The consequences of faking anger in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015
15.
CummingsL. L.BromileyP. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 302(330), 39–52.
16.
DasboroughM. T.AshkanasyN. M.TeeE. Y.HermanH. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.009
17.
de JongB. A.KroonD. P.SchilkeO. (2017). The future of organizational trust research: A content-analytic synthesis of scholarly recommendations and review of recent developments. In van LangeP. A. M.RockenbachB.YamagishiT. (Eds.), Trust in social dilemmas (pp. 173–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DirksK. T.de JongB. A. (2022). Trust within the workplace: A review of two waves of research and a glimpse of the third. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-083025
20.
DirksK. T.SweeneyP. J.DimotakisN.WoodruffT. (2021). Understanding the change and development of trust and the implications for new leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04902-4
21.
DongY.LiY.SunT. (2014). Happy faces considered trustworthy irrespective of perceiver's mood: Challenges to the mood congruency effect. Computers and Security, 47, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2014.04.010
22.
DrążkowskiD.KaczmarekL. D.KashdanT. B. (2017). Gratitude pays: A weekly gratitude intervention influences monetary decisions, physiological responses, and emotional experiences during a trust-related social interaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.043
23.
DruckmanD.OlekalnsM. (2013). Punctuated negotiations: Transitions, interruptions, and turning points. In OlekalnsM.AdairW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of research on negotiation (pp. 332–356). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
24.
DunningD.AndersonJ. E.SchlösserT.EhlebrachtD.FetchenhauerD. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036673
25.
DunnJ.RuedyN. E.SchweitzerM. E. (2012). It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.001
26.
DunnJ. R.SchweitzerM. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
27.
FerrinD. L.DirksK. T.ShahP. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.870
28.
FiedlerK. (2001). Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accommodation. In: MartinL.CloreG. (eds) Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 85–98). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
31.
GabrielA. S.PodsakoffN. P.BealD. J.ScottB. A.SonnentagS.TrougakosJ. P.ButtsM. M. (2019). Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 969–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626
32.
GrandeyA. A.FiskG. M.MattilaA. S.JansenK. J.SidemanL. A. (2005). Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.002
33.
GriessmairM.GettingerJ. (2020). Take the right turn: The role of social signals and action–reaction sequences in enacting turning points in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 29(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09664-4
34.
IliesR.JudgeT. A. (2002). Understanding the dynamic relationships among personality, mood, and job satisfaction: A field experience sampling study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00018-3
35.
KauselE. E.ConnollyT. (2014) Do people have accurate beliefs about the behavioral consequences of incidental emotions? Evidence from trust games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.02.002
36.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (1999) Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168
37.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). The analysis of dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
38.
KenworthyJ. B.JonesJ. (2009). The roles of group importance and anxiety in predicting depersonalized ingroup trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208101058
39.
KimP. H.FerrinD. L.CooperC. D.DirksK. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
40.
KimP. H.MislinA.TuncelE.FehrR.CheshinA.van KleefG. A. (2017). Power as an emotional liability: Implications for perceived authenticity and trust after a transgression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(10), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000292
41.
KongD. T.HoV. T.GargS. (2020). Employee and coworker idiosyncratic deals: Implications for emotional exhaustion and deviant behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4033-9
42.
KorsgaardM. A.BrowerH. H.LesterS. W. (2015). It isn’t always mutual: A critical review of dyadic trust. Journal of Management, 41(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314547521
43.
KorsgaardM. A.KautzJ.BlieseP.SamsonK.KostyszynP. (2018). Conceptualizing time as a level of analysis: New directions in the analysis of trust dynamics. Journal of Trust Research, 8(2), 142–165.
44.
KramerA. D.GuilloryJ. E.HancockJ. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111
45.
KuglerT.YeB.MotroD.NoussairC. N. (2020). On trust and disgust: Evidence from face reading and virtual reality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619856302
46.
LevineE. E.WaldK. A. (2020). Fibbing about your feelings: How feigning happiness in the face of personal hardship affects trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.004
LountR. B.Jr (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017344
51.
LupoliM. J.ZhangM.YinY.OveisC. (2020). A conflict of values: When perceived compassion decreases trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104049
52.
MartinezL. F.ZeelenbergM. (2015). Trust me (or not): Regret and disappointment in experimental economic games. Decision, 2(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000025
53.
MaF.WylieB. E.LuoX.HeZ.JiangR.ZhangY.EvansA. D. (2019). Apologies repair trust via perceived trustworthiness and negative emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758
54.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
55.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
56.
MayerR. C.GavinM. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803928
57.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727
58.
MislinA. A.CampagnaR. L.BottomW. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002
59.
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393889
60.
MöldersS.BrosiP.SpörrleM.WelpeI. M. (2019). The effect of top management trustworthiness on turnover intentions via negative emotions: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3600-9
61.
NewmanD. A.HarrisonD. A.CarpenterN. C.RaridenS. M. (2016). Construct mixology: Forming new management constructs by combining old ones. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 943–995. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1161965
62.
RitzenhöferL.BrosiP.SpörrleM.WelpeI. M. (2017). Leader pride and gratitude differentially impact follower trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(6), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-08-2016-0235
63.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
64.
RychlowskaM.van der SchalkJ.GratchJ.BreitingerE.MansteadA. S. (2019). Beyond actions: Reparatory effects of regret in intergroup trust games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.006
65.
SaadaouiH.El HarbiS.IbanezL. (2019). Do people trust more when they are happy or when they are sad? Evidence from an experiment. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(4), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3008
66.
SchniterE.SheremetaR. M. (2014). Predictable and predictive emotions: Explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401
67.
SchniterE.SheremetaR. M.ShieldsT. W. (2015). Conflicted emotions following trust- based interaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.08.006
68.
SchoormanF. D.MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
69.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
70.
SinaceurM.TiedensL. Z. (2006). Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(3), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.002
71.
TomlinsonE. C.MayerR. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.35713291
72.
TortosaM. I.StrizhkoT.CapizziM.RuzM. (2013). Interpersonal effects of emotion in a multi-round trust game. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 34(2), 179–198.
73.
van der WerffL.BuckleyF. (2017). Getting to know you: A longitudinal examination of trust cues and trust development during socialization. Journal of Management, 43(3), 742–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314543475
74.
Van DijkE.van KleefG. A.SteinelW.van BeestI. (2008). A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when it backfires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.600
75.
Van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
Van KleefG. A. (2014). Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations, 67(9), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713510329
78.
Van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K.MansteadA. S. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57
79.
Van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.CheshinA. (2012). Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612454911
80.
van KnippenbergD. (2018). Reconsidering affect-based trust: A new research agenda. In SearleR. H.NienaberA. M. I.SitkinS. B. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to trust (pp. 3–13). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
81.
WilliamsM. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351867
82.
WilliamsM.BelkinL. Y.ChenC. C. (2020). Cognitive flexibility matters: The role of multilevel positive affect and cognitive flexibility in shaping victims’ cooperative and uncooperative behavioral responses to trust violations. Group & Organization Management, 45(2), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120911224
83.
YakovlevaM.ReillyR. R.WerkoR. (2010). Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017102
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
