We introduce a three-phase model of decision-making as examined through a Machiavellian lens. Distinct from previous research, we broaden our research premise from Machiavellianism exhibited by an individual to Machiavellianism at the organizational level. We examine this type of organization beginning with an emphasis on organizational values and practices, which we define as climate emergence. After establishing the process of climate emergence, we examine employee sensemaking within a Machiavellian climate by drawing on Rest's decision-making model. Our research culminates with an exploration of resultant employee behaviors while emphasizing the moderating role of dispositional Machiavellianism. We conclude with a discussion centered on how this perspective fits within recent research and its impact on organizational practices.
AnconaD. G.OkhuysenG. A.PerlowL. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393887.
3.
BabalolaM. T.RenS.OgbonnayaC.RiislaK.SoetanG. T.GokK. (2022). Thriving at work but insomniac at home: Understanding the relationship between supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee functioning. Human Relations, 75(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720978687.
4.
BanduraA.McClellandD. C. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
6.
BelschakF. D.Den HartogD. N.KalshovenK. (2015). Leading Machiavellians: How to translate Machiavellians’ selfishness into pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1934–1956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484513.
7.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
8.
BolinoM. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580442.
9.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1512.
10.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin52(4), 281.
11.
CropanzanoR.AnthonyE. L.DanielsS. R.HallA. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099.
12.
DahlingJ. J.WhitakerB. G.LevyP. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618.
13.
DavisM. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211.
14.
DeCellesK. A.AquinoK. (2020). Dark knights: When and why an employee becomes a workplace vigilante. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0300.
15.
DiamondJ. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
16.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
17.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
18.
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.
19.
FehrR.FulmerA.AwtreyE.MillerJ. A. (2017). The grateful workplace: A multilevel model of gratitude in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0374.
20.
FehrR.GelfandM. J. (2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 664–688. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0497.
21.
FlynnF. J.ReagansR. E.AmanatullahE. T.AmesD. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123.
22.
ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.McDanielM. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679.
GarrettD. E.BradfordJ. L.MeyersR. A.BeckerJ. (1989). Issues management and organizational accounts: An analysis of corporate responses to accusations of unethical business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(7), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00382927.
25.
GreenbaumR. L.HillA.MawritzM. B.QuadeM. J. (2017). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management, 43(2), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535434.
26.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872.
27.
HällgrenM.RouleauL.De RondM. (2018). A matter of life or death: How extreme context research matters for management and organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 111–153. https://doi.org/doi/10.5465/annals.2016.0017.
28.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424.
29.
HarveyJ.BolinoM. C.KelemenT. K. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior in the 21st century: How might going the extra mile look different at the start of the new millennium? In BuckleyM. R.WheelerA. R.HalbeslebenJ. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 36, pp. 51–110). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-730120180000036002.
30.
HastingsR.MeyerE. (2020). No rules rules: Netflix and the culture of reinvention. New York, NY: Penguin.
31.
HouseR. J.ShaneS. A.HeroldD. M. (1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161570.
32.
JonasonP. K.TostJ. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The dark triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.031.
33.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958.
34.
JonesD. N.MuellerS. M. (2021). Is Machiavellianism dead or dormant? The perils of researching a secretive construct. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04708-w
35.
JosephsonM. (1934). The robber barons: The great American capitalists 1861-1901. Harvest Book. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
36.
JuD.HuangM.LiuD.QinX.HuQ.ChenC. (2019). Supervisory consequences of abusive supervision: An investigation of sense of power, managerial self-efficacy, and task-oriented leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.003.
37.
KantI. (1785). The categorical imperative. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
38.
KelemenT. K.MatthewsS. H.BreevaartK. (2020a). Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), Article 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344.
39.
KelemenT. K.MatthewsS. H.ZhangX. A.BradleyB. H.LiuH. (2020b). When does gender diversity enhance team performance? The dual need for visionary leadership and team tenure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(9), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12690.
40.
KilduffG. J.GalinskyA. D.GalloE.ReadeJ. J. (2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1508–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0545.
41.
KlüppelL. M.PierceL.SnyderJ. A. (2018). Perspective—The deep historical roots of organization and strategy: Traumatic shocks, culture, and institutions. Organization Science, 29(4), 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1173.
42.
KohlbergL. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
43.
KouchakiM.SmithI. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498099.
44.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x.
45.
Kristof‐BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34.
48.
MachiavelliN. (1513/2008). The prince. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
MartinK. D.CullenJ. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9084-7.
51.
MatthewsM. J.MatthewsS. H.WangD. D.KelemenT. K. (2021). Tweet, like, subscribe! Understanding leadership through social media use. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(1), Article 101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101580.
52.
MawritzM. B.DustS. B.ResickC. J. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863.
53.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633.
54.
MeléD.FontrodonaJ. (2017). Christian ethics and spirituality in leading business organizations: Editorial introduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(4), 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3323-3.
55.
MischelW. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In MagnussonD.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
MooreC.GinoF. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 235–289. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1011522.
57.
MotroD.OrdóñezL. D.PittarelloA.WelshD. T. (2018). Investigating the effects of anger and guilt on unethical behavior: A dual-process approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3337-x.
58.
NaumannS. E.BennettN. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 881–889. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556416.
59.
O’BoyleE. H.ForsythD.BanksG. C.StoryP. A. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the dark triad–intelligence connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.001.
60.
OstroffC.KinickiA. J.TamkinsM. M. (2003). Organizational climate and culture. In BormanW. C.IlgenD. R.KlimoskiR. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, volume 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 365–402). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61.
ParkinsonG. H. R. (1955). Ethics and politics in Machiavelli. The Philosophical Quarterly, 5(18), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217044.
62.
PaulinD.GriffinB. (2017). Team incivility climate scale: Development and validation of the team-level incivility climate construct. Group & Organization Management, 42(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115622100.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
65.
PinkD. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Penguin.
66.
RaoH. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150904.
67.
RestJ. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. West Port, CT: Praeger.
68.
ReuberA. R.FischerE. (2010). Organizations behaving badly: When are discreditable actions likely to damage organizational reputation?Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0180-3.
69.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
70.
SackettP. R.LievensF.Van IddekingeC. H.KuncelN. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000151.
71.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391803.
72.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563.
73.
SandelM. J. (2011). Justice: What’s the right thing to do. Boston University Law Review, 91(4), 1303–1310.
SchneiderB.EhrhartM. G.MayerD. M.SaltzJ. L.Niles-JollyK. (2005). Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573107.
76.
ShippA. J.RichardsonH. A. (2021). The impact of temporal schemata: Understanding when individuals entrain versus resist or create temporal structure. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0384.
77.
SmithJ. R.HaslamA. (2017). Social psychology: Revisiting the classic studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
SuddabyR. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.51141319.
79.
SullivanB. N.HaunschildP.PageK. (2007). Organizations non gratae? The impact of unethical corporate acts on interorganizational networks. Organization Science, 18(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0229.
80.
SwiderB. W.BarrickM. R.HarrisT. B.StoverinkA. C. (2011). Managing and creating an image in the interview: The role of interviewee initial impressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1275–12888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024005.
81.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In HatchM. J.SchultzM. (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82.
TettR. P.BurnettD. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500.
83.
TettR. P.GutermanH. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292.
84.
TolstoyL. (1877). Anna Karenina. The Russian Messenger.
85.
TreviñoL. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
86.
TreviñoL. K.WeaverG. R.ReynoldsS. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206306294258.
87.
Uhl-BienM.RiggioR. E.LoweK. B.CarstenM. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007.
88.
VictorB.CullenJ. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857.
89.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society. (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
90.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
92.
WimbushJ. C.ShepardJ. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00871811.
93.
ZhongC. B.BohnsV. K.GinoF. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360754.
94.
ZoharD. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96.
