Moral disengagement plays an important role in the routinization of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) as a key mediator. What remains unclear are the factors that could attenuate the power of moral disengagement in this process. Building on social-cognitive theory, we hypothesize the moderating role of moral self-efficacy and suggest the importance of two different dimensions: self-reflective and behavioral moral self-efficacies. While the former should buffer the CWB-moral disengagement path over time, the latter should buffer the moral disengagement-CWB path. After presenting the psychometric properties of the moral self-efficacy scale in two independent samples (Study 1: United Kingdom, N = 359; Study 2: Italy, N = 1308), we test the posited multi-wave moderated-mediated model. Results from a structural equation model supported our hypotheses. Results demonstrate that the routinization of CWB through the mediation of moral disengagement over time is conditionally influenced by the two moral self-efficacy dimensions. Employees high in capability to look back and question the assumptions that affected their behavior (i.e., self-reflective moral self-efficacy) are less likely to morally disengage as a result of previous engagement in CWB. Employees high in capability to morally self-regulate (i.e., behavioral moral self-efficacy) are less likely to engage in CWB as a result of their moral disengagement. Results of the conditional indirect effect suggest that previous engagement in CWB is not translated in future engagement in CWB for those individuals high in both moral self-efficacy dimensions.
ArbuckleJ. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
4.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W H Freeman.
6.
BanduraA. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In PerrigW. J.GrobA. (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 17–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
9.
BanduraA. (2006a). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales (Revised). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5, 307–337.
BanduraA. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
12.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
13.
BarbaranelliC.FidaR.PacielloM.TramontanoC. (2018). ‘Possunt, quia posse videntur’: They can because they think they can. Development and validation of the Work Self-Efficacy scale: Evidence from two studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.006
14.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self‐control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165-1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086
15.
BazermanM. H.GinoF. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173815
BerryC. M.OnesD. S.SackettP. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410
18.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus : Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
19.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2016). Self-Regulation of Action and Affect. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation : research, theory, and applications (Third, pp. 3–23). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
21.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
ChughD.KernM. C. (2016). A dynamic and cyclical model of bounded ethicality. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.07.002
24.
CoffmanD. L.MacCallumR. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
25.
DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.SweitzerV. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
DuffyM. K.ScottK. L.ShawJ. D.TepperB. J.AquinoK. (2012). A Social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643-666. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0804
FidaR.GhezziV.PacielloM.TramontanoC.DentaleF.BarbaranelliC. (2021). The implicit component of moral disengagement: Applying the relational responding task to investigate its relationship with cheating behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220984293
30.
FidaR.PacielloM.TramontanoC.BarbaranelliC.FarneseM. L. (2015). “Yes, I Can”: The protective role of personal self-efficacy in hindering counterproductive work behavior under stressful conditions. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 28(5), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.969718
31.
FidaR.PacielloM.TramontanoC.FontaineR. G.BarbaranelliC.FarneseM. L. (2015). An integrative approach to understanding counterproductive work behavior: The roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2209-5
32.
FidaR.TramontanoC.PacielloM.GhezziV.BarbaranelliC. (2018). Understanding the interplay among regulatory self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and academic cheating behaviour during vocational education: A three-wave study. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3373-6
33.
FontaineR. G.FidaR.PacielloM.TisakM. S.CapraraG. V. (2014). The mediating role of moral disengagement in the developmental course from peer rejection in adolescence to crime in early adulthood. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2012.719622
34.
FoxS.SpectorP. E.GohA.BruursemaK. (2007). Does your coworker know what you’re doing? Convergence of self- and peer-reports of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.1.41
35.
FriezeI. H.LiM. Y. (2010). Gender, aggression, and prosocial behavior In. Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 311–335). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_13
36.
GasparJ. P.SeabrightM. A.ReynoldsS. J.YamK. C. (2015). Counterfactual and factual reflection: The influence of past misdeeds on future immoral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(4), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1015477
37.
GongY.KimT.-Y.LiuZ. (2020). Diversity of social ties and creativity: Creative self-efficacy as mediator and tie strength as moderator. Human Relations, 73(12), 1664–1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719866001
38.
GriepY.GermeysL.KraakJ. M. (2021). Unpacking the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: Moral licensing and temporal focus. Group & Organization Management, 46(1), 819–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121995366
39.
HannahS. T.AvolioB. J. (2010). Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022283
40.
HuangG.WellmanN.AshfordS. J.LeeC.WangL. (2017). Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000158.
41.
JainaJ.TysonS. (2004). Psychological similarity in work-based relationships and the development of self-efficacy beliefs. Human Relations, 57(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704043272
42.
JenkinsM. F.ZapfD.WinefieldH.SarrisA. (2012). Bullying allegations from the accused bully’s perspective. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00778.x
43.
JudgeT. A.JacksonC. L.ShawJ. C.ScottB. A.RichB. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
44.
KennedyJ. A.KrayL. J.KuG. (2017). A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003
45.
KleinA.MoosbruggerH. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296338
46.
LiaoK. Y.-H.SteadG. B.LiaoC.-Y. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Self-Compassion and Self-Efficacy. Mindfulness, 12(8), 1878–1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01626-4
47.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford press.
48.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
49.
MargolisJ. D. (2009). The responsibility gap. The Hedgehog Review, 11(2), 41–54.
50.
McFerranB.AquinoK.DuffyM. (2010). How personality and moral identity relate to individuals’ ethical ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20102014
51.
McNattD. B.JudgeT. A. (2008). Self-efficacy intervention, job attitudes, and turnover: A field experiment with employees in role transition. Human Relations, 61(6), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708092404
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
54.
MillsapR. E.MeredithW. (2007). Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In CudekR.MacCallumR. C. (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions (Vol. 100, pp. 131–152). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55.
MooreC. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9447-8
MooreC.DetertJ. R.TrevinoL.BakerV. L.MayerD. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x
58.
MooreC.GinoF. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.08.001
59.
MooreC.MayerD. M.ChiangF. F. T.CrossleyC.KarleskyM. J.BirtchT. A. (2019). Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000341
NewmanA.LeH.North-SamardzicA.CohenM. (2020). Moral disengagement at work: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 535–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04173-0
62.
NgK.NivenK.HoelH. (2019). I could help, but… ’: A dynamic sensemaking model of workplace bullying bystanders. Human Relations, 73(12), 1718–1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719884617
63.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-hill education.
64.
OettingenG. (1995). Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy. In BanduraA. (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 149–176). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527692.007
65.
OgunfoworaB. T.NguyenV. Q.SteelP.HwangC. C. (2021). A meta-analytic investigation of the antecedents, theoretical correlates, and consequences of moral disengagement at work. Journal of Applied Psychology.
66.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
67.
PacielloM.FidaR.TramontanoC.LupinettiC.CapraraG. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x
68.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
69.
SardeshmukhS. R.VandenbergR. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621609
70.
SchönD. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor and Francis.
71.
SchwarzerR.WarnerL. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilienceResilience in children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 139–150). New York, NY: Springer.
72.
Scott-LennixJ. A.LennoxR. D. (1995). Sex—race differences in social support and depression in older low-income adults. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 199–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
73.
ShojiK.CieslakR.SmoktunowiczE.RogalaA.BenightC. C.LuszczynskaA. (2016). Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 29(4), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2015.1058369
74.
ShuL. L.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2011). Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398138
75.
SimsR. R.FeltonE. L. (2006). Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3562-1
76.
SpectorP. E.BauerJ. A.FoxS. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know?Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019477
77.
SpectorP. E.FoxS. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In FoxS.SpectorP. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. Worcester, MA: American Psychological Association.
78.
StajkovicA. D.LuthansF. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
79.
SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
WelshD. T.OrdóñezL. D.SnyderD. G.ChristianM. S. (2015). The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036950
YangL. Q.CaughlinD. E.GazicaM. W.TruxilloD. M.SpectorP. E. (2014). Workplace mistreatment climate and potential employee and organizational outcomes: A meta-analytic review from the target's perspective. Journal of occupational health psychology, 19(3), 315–335.
85.
ZabrodskaK.EllwoodC.ZaeemdarS.MudrakJ. (2016). Workplace bullying as sensemaking: An analysis of target and actor perspectives on initial hostile interactions. Culture and Organization, 22(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.894514
86.
ZhangT.GinoF.MargolisJ. D. (2018). Does “could” lead to good? On the road to moral insight. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 857–895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0839
87.
ZhongR.RobinsonS. L. (2021). What happens to bad actors in organizations? A review of actor-centric outcomes of negative behavior. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1430–1467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320976808
ZsolnaiL. (2016).Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves, by Albert Bandura (p. 544). New York, NY: Macmillan, 2016. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26 (3), 426–429.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
