Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies have grown in sophistication and reach. Accordingly, research into mixed human–robot teams that comprise both robots and humans has expanded as well, attracting the attention of researchers from different disciplines, such as organizational behavior, human–robot interaction, cognitive science, and robotics. With this systematic literature review, the authors seek to establish deeper insights into existing research and sharpen the definitions of relevant terms. With a close consideration of 150 studies published between 1990 and 2020 that investigate mixed human–robot teams, conceptually or empirically, this article provides both a systematic evaluation of extant research and propositions for further research.

Keywords

mixed human–robot team technology team dynamics/processes intra-team dynamics inter-team dynamics robotic teammate robotic leader robotic team assistant robotic roles overview

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

A. M. H.

der Pütten

A. M. R.

(2020). I–C–E framework: Concepts for group dynamics research in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(6), 1213-1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00642-z.

ACM (2007). Proceedings of the 2007 ACE/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Robot as Team Member. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

Adams

J. S.

(1963). Toward an understanding in inequity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67, 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968.

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 267-299). Elsevier, Burlington. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2.

Alboul

Saez-Pons

Penders

(2008). Mixed human-robot team navigation in the GUARDIANS project. In SSRR 2008: IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (pp. 95-101). IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSRR.2008.4745884.

Ambrose

R. O.

Aldridge

Askew

R. S.

Burridge

R. R.

Bluethmann

Diftler

Lovchik

Magruder

Rehnmark

(2000). Robonaut: NASA’s space humanoid. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(4), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.867913.

Arnold

Scheutz

(2017). Beyond moral dilemmas: Exploring the ethical landscape in HRI. In 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 445-452). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020255

Arnold

Scheutz

(2018). Observing robot touch in context: How does touch and attitude affect perceptions of a robot's social qualities? In HRI '18, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171263.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

10.

Barrick

M. R.

Stewart

G. L.

Neubert

M. J.

Mount

M. K.

(1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377.

11.

Bartneck

Reichenbach

Carpenter

(2006). Use of Praise and Punishment in Human-Robot Collaborative Teams. In ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 177–182). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314414

12.

Bell

S. T.

Marentette

B. J.

(2011). Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386611405876.

13.

Bluethmann

Ambrose

Diftler

Askew

Huber

Goza

Rehnmark

Lovchik

Magruder

(2003). Robonaut: a robot designed to work with humans in space. Autonomous Robots, 14(2-3), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022231703061.

14.

Bozcuoglu

A. K.

Yazdani

Beßler

Togorean

Beetz

(2015). Reasoning on communication between agents in a human-robot rescue team. In Aly

Griffiths

Stramandinoli

Chairs

(Eds), In Towards Intelligent Social Robots: Current Advances in Cognitive Robotics: Workshop in Conjunction with Humanoids 2015. Seoul, South Korea.

15.

Bradshaw

J. M.

Dignum

Jonker

Sierhuis

(2012). Human-agent-robot teamwork. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2012.37.

16.

Bradshaw

J. M.

Feltovich

Johnson

Breedy

Bunch

Eskridge

Jung

Lott

Uszok

van Diggelen

(2009). From tools to teammates: Joint activity in human-agent-robot teams. In Kurosu

(Ed), Human Centered Design (pp. 935-944). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_107.

17.

Braga

J. L.

(1972). Role theory, cognitive dissonance theory, and the interdisciplinary team. Interchange, 3(4), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145409.

18.

Breazeal

(2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00373-1.

19.

Breazeal

Brooks

Chilongo

Gray

Hoffman

Kidd

C. D.

Lee

Lieberman

Lockerd

(2004). Working collaboratively with humanoid robots. In 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004. IEEE. Santa Monica, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2004.1442126

20.

Breazeal

Hoffman

Lockerd

(2004). Teaching and working with robots as a collaboration. In Jennings

(Ed), Proceedings of the third International joint conference on autonomous agents & multiagent systems (3, pp. 1030-1037). Association for Computing Machinery, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/AAMAS.2004.242646.

21.

Breazeal

Kidd

C. D.

Lockerd Thomaz

Hoffman

Berlin

(2005). Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE. Edmonton, Cananda. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2005.1545011.

22.

Brown

Toh

Sukkarieh

(2005). A flexible human-robot team framework for information gathering missions. In Sammut

(Ed), Proceedings of the 2005 Australasian Conference on Robotics & Automation. Australian Robotics and Automation Association Inc. Sydney.

23.

Bruemmer

D. J.

Marble

J. L.

Dudenhoeffer

D. D.

(2002). Mutual initiative in human-machine teams. In Persensky

J. J.

Hallbert

Blackman (Chairs

(Eds), New century, new trends: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HFPP.2002.1042863.

24.

Bruemmer

D. J.

Walton

M. C.

(2003). Collaborative tools for mixed teams of humans and robots [Conference presentation]. International Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems. Washington, DC, USA.

25.

Burke

J. L.

Murphy

R. R.

(2004). Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: two heads are better than one. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759) (pp. 307–312). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374778.

26.

Burke

J. L.

Murphy

R. R.

(2007). RSVP: An investigation of remote shared visual presence as common ground for human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Robot as team member (p. 161–168). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228738.

27.

Burke

J. L.

Pratt

K. S.

Murphy

R. R.

Lineberry

Taing

Day

(2008). Toward developing HRI metrics for teams: Pilot testing in the field. In Burghart

C. R.

Steinfeld (Chairs)

, Proceedings of metrics for human-robot interaction workshop in affiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference of human-robot interaction (HRI 2008). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

28.

Canning

Donahue

T. J.

Scheutz

(2014). Investigating human perceptions of robot capabilities in remote human-robot team tasks based on first-person robot video feeds IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2014.6943178.

29.

Chen

Nikolaidis

Soh

Hsu

Srinivasa

(2020). Trust-aware decision making for human-robot collaboration: Model learning and planning. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 9(29), 1-923. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359616.

30.

Ciocirlan

S.-D.

Agrigoroaie

Tapus

(2019). Human-robot team: Effects of communication in analyzing trust. 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New Delhi, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956345.

31.

Claure

Chen

Modi

Jung

M. F.

Nikolaidis

(2020). Multi-armed bandits with fairness constraints for distributing resources to human teammates. HRI '20, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 299-308). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374806.

32.

Correia

Mascarenhas

S. F.

Gomes

Arriaga

Leite

Prada

Melo

F. S.

Paiva

(2019). Exploring prosociality in human-robot teams. Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 143-151). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673299.

33.

Correia

Petisca

Alves-Oliveira

Ribeiro

Melo

F. S.

Paiva

(2019). “I choose YOU!” Membership preferences in human–robot teams. Autonomous Robots, 43(2), 359-373. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9767-9.

34.

Crandall

J. W.

Nielsen

C. W.

Goodrich

M. A.

(2003). Towards predicting robot team performance. SMC’03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance. (Cat.: No.03CH37483).

35.

Davis

F. D.

(1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. DSpace@MIT. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192.

36.

De Visser

Parasuraman

Freedy

Weltman

(2006). A comprehensive methodology for assessing human-robot team performance for use in training and simulation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(25), 2639-2643. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605002507.

37.

de Visser

E. J.

Peeters

M. M. M.

Jung

M. F.

Kohn

Shaw

T. H.

Pak

Neerincx

M. A.

(2020). Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x.

38.

de Wit

F. R. C.

Greer

L. L.

(2008). The black-box deciphered: a meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33716526.

39.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

Doty

(2013). Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032896.

40.

Dell Technologies (2018). Realizing 2030: A divided vision of the future. www.delltechnologies.com/realizing2030.

41.

Demir

McNeese

N. J.

Cooke

N. J.

(2020). Understanding human-robot teams in light of all-human teams: Aspects of team interaction and shared cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 140, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102436.

42.

Deng

Mutlu

Mataric

M. J.

(2019). Embodiment in socially interactive robots. Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, 7(4), 251-356. https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000056.

43.

Dennis

A. R.

Fuller

R. M.

Valacich

J. S.

(2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857.

44.

Dennis

A. R.

Kinney

S. T.

(1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256.

45.

Dias

M. B.

Kannan

Browning

Jones

Argall

Dias

M. F.

Zinck

Veloso

M. M.

Stentz

April

(2008). Sliding autonomy for peer-to-peer human-robot teams (CMU-RI-TR-08-16). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.

46.

Dudenhoeffer

D. D.

Bruemmer

D. J.

Davis

M. L.

(2001). Modeling and simulation for exploring human-robot team interaction requirements. Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304) (11, pp. 730-739). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2001.977361.

47.

Endsley

M. R.

(1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543.

48.

Eyssel

Kuchenbrandt

(2012). Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x.

49.

Fiore

S. M.

Badler

N. L.

Boloni

Goodrich

M. A.

A. S.

Chen

(2011). Human-robot teams collaborating socially, organizationally, and culturally. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551096.

50.

Fong

Nourbakhsh

Dautenhahn

(2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X.

51.

Fong

Nourbakhsh

Kunz

Fluckiger

Schreiner

Ambrose

Burridge

Simmons

Hiatt

L. M.

Schultz

Trafton

J. G.

Bugajska

Scholtz

(2005). The peer-to-peer human-robot interaction project SPACE Conferences and Exposition: Space 2005. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Long Beach, California. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-6750.

52.

Fong

Scholtz

Shah

J. A.

Fluckiger

Kunz

Lees

Schreiner

Siegel

Hiatt

L. M.

Nourbakhsh

Simmons

Ambrose

Burridge

Antonishek

Bugajska

Schultz

Trafton

J. G.

(2006). A preliminary study of peer-to-peer human-robot interaction. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (4, pp. 3198-3203). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2006.384609.

53.

Fong

Thorpe

Baur

(2001). Collaboration, dialogue, and human-robot interaction. In Jarvis

R. A.

Alexander

(Eds), Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics: Vol. 6, Robotics Research, The Tenth International Symposium, ISRR 2001. Springer.

54.

Forlizzi

DiSalvo

C. F.

(2006). Service robots in the domestic environment. HRI ’06, Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (p. 258). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121286.

55.

Fraune

M. R.

Oisted

B. C.

Sembrowski

C. E.

Gates

K. A.

Krupp

M. M.

Šabanović

(2020). Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Computers in Human Behavior, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106220.

56.

Fraune

M. R.

Sabanovic

Smith

E. R.

(2017). Teammates first: Favoring ingroup robots over outgroup humans. 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1432-1437). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172492.

57.

Freedy

De Visser

E. J.

Gershon

Coeyman

N. C.

(2007). Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems. Ieee. Orlando, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/cts.2007.4621745.

58.

Fuse

Tokumaru

(2020). Social influence of group norms developed by human-robot groups. IEEE Access, 8, 56081-56091. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982181.

59.

Gao

Cummings

M. L.

Bertuccelli

L. F.

(2012). Teamwork in controlling multiple robots. In HRI '12. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 81-88). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157703.

60.

Gervits

Thurston

Thielstrom

Fong

Pham

Scheutz

(2020). Toward genuine robot teammates: Improving human-robot team performance using robot shared mental models. AAMAS ’20, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 429-437). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

61.

Giachetti

R. E.

Marcelli

Cifuentes

Rojas

J. A.

(2013). An agent-based simulation model of human-robot team performance in military environments. Systems Engineering, 16(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21216.

62.

Gladden

M. E.

(2014). The social robot as 'charismatic leader': A phenomenology of human submission to nonhuman power. In Seibt

Hakli

Nørskov

(Eds), Sociable Robots and The Future of Social Relations: Proceedings of Robo-Philosophy 2014. (Vol. 273). IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-480-0-329.

63.

Gladstein

D. L.

(1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392936.

64.

Gombolay

M. C.

Bair

Huang

Shah

(2017). Computational design of mixed-initiative human–robot teaming that considers human factors: Situational awareness, workload, and workflow preferences. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(5-7), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364916688255.

65.

Gombolay

M. C.

Gutierrez

R. A.

Clarke

S. G.

Sturla

G. F.

Shah

J. A.

(2015). Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams. Autonomous Robots, 39(3), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015-9457-9.

66.

Gombolay

M. C.

Huang

Shah

J. A.

(2015). Coordination of human-robot teaming with human task preferences. AAAI Fall Symposium: Technical Report FW-15-01. AAAI. Arlington, VA, USA.

67.

Goodrich

M. A.

McLain

T. W.

Anderson

J. D.

Sun

Crandall

J. W.

(2007). Managing autonomy in robot teams: Observations from four experiments. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Robot as team member (pp. 25–32). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228721.

68.

Green

S. A.

Billinghurst

Chen

Chase

J. G.

(2008). Human-robot collaboration: A literature review and augmented reality approach in design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5772/5664.

69.

Groom

Nass

(2007). Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human–robot teams. International Studies, 8(3), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.10gro.

70.

Harriott

C. E.

Zhang

Adams

J. A.

(2011). Evaluating the applicability of current models of workload to peer-based human-robot teams. HRI ’11, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745257.

71.

Hayes

Scassellati

(2014). Challenges in shared-environment human-robot collaboration. AI Matters, 1(2), 22-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685328.2685335.

72.

Hentschel

Heilman

Peus

(2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men's and women's characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011.

73.

Hiatt

L. M.

Harrison

A. M.

Trafton

J. G.

(2011). Accommodating human variability in human-robot teams through theory of mind. In: IJCAI’11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - (Vol 3, pp. 2066-2071). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-345.

74.

Hiatt

L. M.

Trafton

J. G.

(2010). A cognitive model of theory of mind. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, ICCM, pp. 91-96.

75.

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. Brussels, Belgium. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines.

76.

Hoffman

Breazeal

(2004). Collaboration in human-robot teams. AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference. AIAA. Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-6434.

77.

Hoffman

Breazeal

(2007). Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Robot as team member (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228718.

78.

Hogg

M. A.

Turner

J. C.

(1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150105.

79.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Beersma

Schouten

M. E.

(2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 82-106. https://doi.org/10.5465/armr.2010.0181.

80.

Iqbal

Gonzales

M. J.

Riek

L. D.

(2015). Joint action perception to enable fluent human-robot teamwork. 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. (pp. 404-406). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2015.7333671.

81.

Iqbal

Rack

Riek

L. D.

(2016). Movement coordination in human–robot teams: A dynamical systems approach. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 32(4), 909-919. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2016.2570240.

82.

Iqbal

Riek

L. D.

(2017). Coordination dynamics in multihuman multirobot teams. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2(3), 1712-1717. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2673864.

83.

Jager

K. J.

Tripepi

Chesnaye

N. C.

Dekker

Zoccali

Stel

(2020). Where to look for the most frequent biases? Nephrology, 25(6), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13706.

84.

Jiang

Wang

(2019). Respect your emotion: Human-multi-robot teaming based on regret decision model. In IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) (pp. 936–941). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2019.8843206.

85.

Jung

M. F.

Lee

J. J.

DePalma

Adalgeirsson

S. O.

Hinds

P. J.

Breazeal

(2013). Engaging robots: Easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. CSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1555-1566). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441954.

86.

Jung

M. F.

Martelaro

Hinds

P. J.

(2015). Using robots to moderate team conflict: The case of repairing violations. HRI’15, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 229-236). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696460.

87.

Jung

M. F.

Šabanović

Eyssel

Fraune

M. R.

(2017). Robots in groups and teams. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 401-407). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022659.

88.

Kanfer

Chen

Pritchard

R. D.

(Eds), (2008). Work motivation: Past, present and future (Vol. 27). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

89.

Kantor

Singh

Peterson

Rus

Das

Kumar

Pereira

Spletzer

(2006). Distributed search and rescue with robot and sensor teams. In Yuta

Asama

Prassler

Tsubouchi

Thrun

(Eds), Field and service robotics: Recent advances in reserch and applications (pp. 529-538). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10991459_51.

90.

Kelley

T. L.

(1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Measurement and adjustment Series. World Book Co.

91.

Kelly

Watts

(2017). Slow but likeable? Inefficient robots as caring team members. In Jung

M. F.

Sabanovic

Eyssel

Fraune (Chairs)

M. R.

(Eds), Robots in groups and teams: A CSCW 2017 Workshop. https://hri.cornell.edu/robots-in-groups/.

92.

Kirby

Forlizzi

Simmons

(2010). Affective social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58(3), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2009.09.015.

93.

Kittmann

Fröhlich

Schäfer

Reiser

Weißhardt

Haug

(2015). Let me introduce myself: I am Care-O-bot 4, a gentleman robot. In Diefenbach

Henze

Pielot

(Eds), Mensch und Computer 2015 – Proceedings (pp. 223-232). De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

94.

Koppula

H. S.

Jain

Saxena

(2016). Anticipatory planning for human-robot teams. In Hsieh

M. A.

Khatib

Kumar

(Eds), Experimental Robotics: The 14th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (109th ed., pp. 453-470). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23778-7_30.

95.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Bell

B. S.

(2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman

W. C.

Ilgen

D. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

(Eds), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology/Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei1214.

96.

Krämer

N. C.

Pütten

Eimler

(2012). Human-agent and human-robot interaction theory: Similarities to and differences from human-human interaction. In Zacarias

de Oliveira

J. V.

(Eds), Studies in Computational Intelligence. Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective (396, pp. 215-240). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2_9.

97.

Kreijns

Kirschner

P. A.

Jochems

(2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00057-2.

98.

Kruijff-Korbayová

Colas

Gianni

Pirri

Greeff

Hindriks

Neerincx

M. A.

Ögren

Svoboda

Worst

(2015). TRADR project: Long-term human-robot teaming for robot assisted disaster response. Künstliche Intelligenz, 29(2), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-015-0352-5 .[Rainer]

(2014). Experience in system design for human-robot teaming in urban search and rescue. In Yoshida

Tadokoro

(Eds), Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Field and Service Robotics (92, pp. 111-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_8.

(2012). Situated communication for joint activity in human-robot teams. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2012.8.

101.

Kruijff

G. J. M.

Kruijff-Korbayová

Keshavdas

Larochelle

Janíček

Colas

Liu

Pomerleau

Siegwart

Neerincx

M. A.

Looije

Smets

N. J. J. M.

Mioch

van Diggelen

Pirri

Gianni

Ferri

Menna

Worst

Linder

Tretyakov

Surmann

Svoboda

Reinštein

Zimmermann

Petříček

Hlaváč

(2014). Designing, developing, and deploying systems to support human–robot teams in disaster response. Advanced Robotics, 28(23), 1547-1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2014.985335.

102.

Kuchenbrandt

Eyssel

Bobinger

Neufeld

(2013). When a robot’s group membership matters. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0197-8.

(2019). Influencing leading and following in human-robot teams. Proceedings of Robotics: Science Systems. https://doi.org/10.15607/rss.2019.xv.075.

104.

Law

Chita-Tegmark

Scheutz

(2020). The interplay between emotional intelligence, trust, and gender in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(3), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00624-1 .

(2010). Teams for teams: Performance in multi-human/multi-robot teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(4), 438-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193121005400435.

(2020). Should I blame the human or the robot? Attribution within a human–robot group. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00645-w .

(2008). A meta‐analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x.

108.

Levitt

S. D.

List

J. A.

(2005). What do laboratory experiments tell us about the real world?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21.

109.

Lewis

Wang

Chien

S.-Y.

Scerri

Velagapudi

Sycara

Kane

(2010). Teams organization and performance in multi-human/multi-robot teams. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 1617-1623). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2010.5642379 .

110.

Liu

Tomizuka

(2014). Modeling and controller design of cooperative robots in workspace sharing human-robot assembly teams. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2014.6942738.

111.

S.-Y.

Short

E. S.

Thomaz

A. L.

(2020). Planning with partner uncertainty modeling for efficient information revealing in teamwork. HRI’20, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 319-327). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374827 .

(1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In Halasz

(Ed), Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW (90, pp. 357-370). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99367 .

(2007). A mixed Initiative controller and testbed for human robot teams in tactical operations. In Finin

T. W.

(Ed), Technical Report: FS-07-06. Regarding the “intelligence” in distributed intelligent systems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium. AAAI Press.

(2003). Lessons learned from usability tests with a collaborative cognitive workspace for human-robot teams. SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems. Washington, DC, USA: Man and Cybernetics.

(2004). Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction with human-robot teams. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. USA: Big Island, HI. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265326.

116.

Marge

M. R.

Pappu

A. K.

Frisch

Harris

T. K.

Rudnicky

(2009). Exploring spoken dialog interaction in human-robot teams. In Balakirsky

Carpin

Lewis (Chairs

(Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), Workshop on Robots, Games, and Research: Success stories in USARSim. St. Louis, MO, USA. http://repository.cmu.edu/compsci/1351.

117.

Marsh

H. W.

Pekrun

Parker

P. D.

Murayama

Guo

Dicke

Arens

A. K.

(2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281.

118.

McKnight

D. H.

Carter

Thatcher

J. B.

Clay

P. F.

(2011). Trust in a specific technology. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353.

119.

Minato

Shimada

Ishiguro

Itakura

(2004). Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction. In Orchard

Yang

Ali

(Eds), Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence (pp. 424-434). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_44.

120.

Mingyue Ma

Fong

Micire

M. J.

Kim

Y. K.

Feigh

Mingyue Ma

(2018). Human-robot teaming: concepts and components for design. In Hutter

Siegwart

(Eds), Field and Service Robotics (Vol. 5, pp. 649-663). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_42.

121.

Musić

Hirche

(2018). Passive noninteracting control for human-robot team interaction. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Miami Beach, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2018.8619289.

122.

Music

Salvietti

Dohmann

PBG

Chinello

Prattichizzo

Hirche

(2019). Human–robot team interaction through wearable haptics for cooperative manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 12(3), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2019.2921565.

123.

Nakano

Goodrich

M. A.

(2015). Graphical narrative interfaces: Representing spatiotemporal information for a highly autonomous human-robot team. 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2015.7333684.

124.

Nass

Streuer

Tauber

E. R.

(1994). Computers are social actors. In Adelson

Dumais

Olson

(Eds), CHI '94, CHI ’94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 72-78). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703.

125.

Natarajan

Gombolay

M. C.

(2020). Effects of anthropomorphism and accountability on trust in human robot interaction. HRI’20, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 33-42). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374839.

126.

Nevatia

Stoyanov

Rathnam

Pfingsthorn

Markov

Ambrus

Birk

(2008). Augmented autonomy: Improving human-robot team performance in urban search and rescue. IEEE/RSJ international Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Nice, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2008.4651034.

127.

Nikolaidis

Kwon

Forlizzi

Srinivasa

(2018). Planning with verbal communication for human-robot collaboration. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 7(322), 1-2221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3203305.

128.

Nikolaidis

Lasota

Ramakrishnan

Shah

(2015). Improved human–robot team performance through cross-training, an approach inspired by human team training practices. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 34(14), 1711-1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915609673.

129.

Nikolaidis

Shah

(2012). Human-robot teaming using shared mental models. HRI’12. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM.

130.

Nikolaidis

Shah

(2013). Human-robot cross-training: Computational formulation, modeling and evaluation of a human team training strategy. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1109/hri.2013.6483499.

131.

Nourbakhsh

I. R.

Sycara

Koes

Yong

Lewis

Burion

(2005). Human-robot teaming for search and rescue. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2005.13.

132.

Navarro-Serment

Suppe

Stentz

Hebert

(2015). Inferring door locations from a teammate’s trajectory in stealth human-robot team operations 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 5315-5320). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354127.

133.

Oleson

K. E.

Billings

D. R.

Kocsis

Chen

J. Y. C.

Hancock

P. A.

(2011). Antecedents of trust in human-robot collaborations. 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support. Miami Beach, FL, USA: CogSIMA). https://doi.org/10.1109/cogsima.2011.5753439.

134.

Onnasch

Roesler

(2020). A taxonomy to structure and analyze human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5.

135.

Ososky

Schuster

Phillips

Jentsch

(2013). Building appropriate trust in human-robot teams. AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous Systems.

136.

Pages

Marchionni

Ferro

(2016). TIAGo: The modular robot that adapts to different research needs. International Workshop on Robot Modularity. Daejeon, Korea.

137.

Pandey

A. K.

Gelin

(2018). A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, (25)(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157.

138.

Phillips

Ososky

Swigert

Jentsch

(2012). Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1553-1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561309.

139.

Phillips

Schaefer

K. E.

Billings

D. R.

Jentsch

Hancock

P. A.

(2016). Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams: Influencing design and fostering trust. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(1), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.1.

140.

Pina

Cummings

M. L.

Crandall

J. W.

Della Penna

(2008). Identifying generalizable metric classes to evaluate human-robot teams. In Burghart

C. R.

Steinfeld (Chairs

(Eds), Proceedings of metrics for human-robot interaction workshop in affiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference of human-robot interaction (HRI 2008). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

141.

Ranzato

A. J.

Vertesi

(2017). From I-robot to we-robot: Effects of team structure on robotic tasks. In Jung

M. F.

Sabanovic

Eyssel

Fraune (Chairs

M. R.

(Eds), Robots in groups and teams: A CSCW 2017 workshop. https://hri.cornell.edu/robots-in-groups/.

142.

Richert

ShehadehMüller

Schröder

Jeschke

(2016). Robotic workmates: Hybrid human-robot-teams in the Industry 4.0. In Idrus

R. M.

Zainuddin

(Eds), ICEL2016-Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on e-Learning: ICEl2016. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.

143.

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2018). Motivational theory of human robot teamwork. International Robotics & Automation Journal, 4(4), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.15406/iratj.2018.04.00131.

144.

Robert

L. P.

Jr. You

(2015). Subgroup formation in teams working with robots. In Begole

Kim

Inkpen

Woo

(Eds), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA (15, pp. 2097-2102). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732791.

145.

Rouse

W. B.

Morris

N. M.

(1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349.

146.

Salovey

Mayer

J. D.

(1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG.

147.

Samani

H. A.

Cheok

A. D.

(2011). From human-robot relationship to robot-based leadership. 4th International Conference on Human System Interactions. Japan: Yokohama. https://doi.org/10.1109/hsi.2011.5937363.

148.

Scassellati

Vázquez

(2020). The potential of socially assistive robots during infectious disease outbreaks. Science Robotics, 5(44). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abc9014.

149.

Scheutz

DeLoach

S. A.

Adams

J. A.

(2017). A framework for developing and using shared mental models in human-agent teams. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 11(3), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343416682891.

150.

Schmitt

Schäfer

Burmester

(2017). Wie wirkt der Care-O-bot 4 im Verkaufsraum? https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2017-up-0171.

151.

Schwartz

Zinnikus

Krieger

H.-U.

Bürckert

Folz

Kiefer

Hevesi

Lüth

Pirkl

Spieldenner

Schmitz

Wirkus

Straube

(2016). Hybrid teams: Flexible collaboration between humans, robots and virtual agents. In Klusch

Unland

Shehory

Pokahr

Ahrndt

(Eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Multiagent System Technologies (Vol. 9872, pp. 131-146). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45889-2_10.

152.

Scrum Alliance (2021). The scrum team roles and accountabilities. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from: https://resources.scru2007 ACM/IEEE Conferemalliance.org/Article/scrum-team.

153.

Sellner

Heger

F. W.

Hiatt

L. M.

Simmons

Singh

(2006). Coordinated multiagent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7), 1425-1444. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2006.876966.

154.

Shah

Breazeal

(2010). An empirical analysis of team coordination behaviors and action planning with application to human–robot teaming. Human Factors, 52(2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809350882.

155.

Shah

Wiken

Williams

Breazeal

(2011). Improved human-robot team performance using Chaski, a human-inspired plan execution system. HRI’11, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 29-36). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957668.

156.

Sierhuis

Bradshaw

J. M.

Acquisti

van Hoof

Jeffers

(2003). Human-agent teamwork and adjustable autonomy in practice. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence. Nara, Japan: Robotics and Automation in Space.

157.

Stewart

Cao

Nedic

Tomlin

Leonard

(2012). Towards human–robot teams: Model-based analysis of human decision making in two-alternative choice tasks with social feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(3), 751-775. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2011.2173815.

158.

Stock

(2003). Teams an der Schnittstelle zwischen Anbieter- und Kunden-Unternehmen: Eine integrative Betrachtung. Springer-Verlag.

159.

Stock

(2004). Drivers of team performance: What do we know and what have we still to learn?. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(3), 274-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396696.

160.

Stock

Merkle

Eidens

Hannig

Heineck

Nguyen

M. A.

Völker

(2019). When robots enter our workplace: Understanding employee trust in assistive robots. Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems. Munich, Germany.

161.

Strohkorb Sebo

Dong

L. L.

Chang

Scassellati

(2020). Strategies for the inclusion of human members within human-robot teams. HRI '20, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 309-317). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374808.

162.

Strohkorb Sebo

Traeger

M. L.

Jung

M. F.

Scassellati

(2018). The ripple effects of vulnerability: The effects of a robot's vulnerable behavior on trust in human-robot teams. HRI’18, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 178-186). ACM https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171275.

163.

Tajfel

(1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council), 13(2), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204.

164.

Talamadupula

Briggs

Chakraborti

Scheutz

Kambhampati

(2014). Coordination in human-robot teams using mental modeling and plan recognition. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2014.6942970.

165.

Tamburrini

(2009). Robot ethics: A view from the philosophy of science. Ethics and Robotics, 11–22.

166.

Tang

Parker

L. E.

(2006). Peer-to-peer human-robot teaming through reconfigurable schemas. AAAI Spring Symposium: To Boldly Go Where No Human-Robot Team Has Gone Before. Technical Report SS-06-07.

167.

Traeger

M. L.

Strohkorb Sebo

Jung

Scassellati

Christakis

N. A.

(2020). Vulnerable robots positively shape human conversational dynamics in a human–robot team. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6370-6375. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910402117.

168.

SIM TU Darmstadt (2021). Robotergalerie. https://www.sim.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/res/robotics_lab/.

169.

van Breukelen

Schyns

Le Blanc

(2006). Leader-member exchange theory and research: Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership, 2(3), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715006066023.

170.

Venkatesh

Morris

M. G.

Davis

G. B.

Davis

F. D.

(2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, (27:3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

171.

Wang

Lewis

Chien

S.-Y.

(2010). Teams organization and performance analysis in autonomous human-robot teams. PerMIS ’10, Proceedings of the 10th Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (pp. 251-257). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2377576.2377622.

172.

Wang

Pynadath

D. V.

Hill

S. G.

(2016a). The impact of POMDP-generated explanations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (pp. 997-1005). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC.

173.

Wang

Pynadath

D. V.

Hill

S. G.

(2016b). Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations. HRI’16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hri.2016.7451741.

174.

Wang

Pynadath

D. V.

Rovira

Barnes

M. J.

Hill

S. G.

(2018). Is it my looks? Or something I said? The impact of explanations, embodiment, and expectations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In Ham

J. R. C.

Karapanos

Morita

P. P.

Burns

C. M.

(Eds), Persuasive Technology (pp. 56-69). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_5.

175.

Wang

Lewis

(2008). Assessing cooperation in human control of heterogeneous robots. HRI ’08, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 9-16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349825.

176.

Williams

Briggs

Scheutz

(2015). Covert robot-robot communication: Human perceptions and implications for HRI. Journal of Human-Robot InteractionWilliams, 4(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.4.2.

177.

Wolf

F. D.

Stock-Homburg

R. M.

(2021). Making the first step towards robotic leadership – hiring decisions for robotic team leader candidates. ICIS 2021 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2021/hci_robot/hci_robot/2.

178.

Woods

D. D.

Tittle

Feil

Roesler

(2004). Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2004.826272.

179.

Yagoda

R. E.

Gillan

D. J.

(2012). You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human–robot interaction trust scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0.

180.

Yamaji

Miyake

Yoshiike

De Silva

P. R. S.

Okada

(2011). STB: Child-dependent sociable trash box. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(4), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0114-y.

181.

Yazdani

Brieber

Beetz

(2016). Cognition-enabled robot control for mixed human-robot rescue teams. In Menegatti

Michael

Berns

Yamaguchi

(Eds), Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_98.

182.

Goodrich

M. A.

(2014). Supporting task-oriented collaboration in human-robot teams using semantic-based path planning. In Karlsen

R. E.

Gage

D. W.

Shoemaker

C. M.

Gerhart (Chairs

G. R.

(Eds), Baltimore, MD, US: SPIE Defense + Security.

183.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2016). Curiosity vs. control: Impacts of training on performance of teams working with robots. CSCW ’16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (pp. 449-452). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869121.

184.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2017). Emotional attachment, performance, and viability in teams collaborating with embodied physical action (EPA) robots. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 377-407.

185.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2018a). Human-robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker. HRI’18, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 251-260). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171281.

186.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2018b). Teaming up with robots: An IMOI (inputs-mediators-outputs-inputs) framework of human-robot teamwork. International Journal of Robotic Engineering, 2(3).

187.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2019a). Subgroup formation in human-robot teams Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems. Munich, Germany.

188.

You

Robert

L. P.

Jr. (2019b). Trusting robots in teams: Examining the impacts of trusting robots on team performance and satisfaction. Proceedings of the 52th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. USA: Maui, HI.

189.

Zaheer

McEvily

Perrone

(1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141.

190.

Zheng

Glas

D. F.

Kanda

Ishiguro

Hagita

(2013). Designing and implementing a human–robot team for social interactions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 43(4), 843-859. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2216870.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.48 MB

0.24 MB

How and When Can Robots Be Team Members? Three Decades of Research on Human–Robot Teams

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material