We examine turnover reasons for dysfunctional (i.e., high-performing or high-competency) leavers versus functional (i.e., low-performing or low-competency) leavers. In a United States retail bank, high performers reported wanting better advancement or development opportunities as their top turnover reason, whereas low performers mentioned wanting different job tasks, job insecurity, work stress, problems with coworkers, and generic problems with management more frequently than high performers. In an Indian IT consultancy firm, job performance and competency level were positively related to reporting problems with leadership/upper management, whereas performance was negatively related to reporting a specific alternative job offer. Through these studies, we develop a novel turnover reason measure for scholars and practitioners that assesses reason importance, enables the vital accumulation of data across studies, and increases diagnostic potential in exit or stay interviews/surveys. Finally, we offer directions for building theory and improving the management of high-performer turnover.
AllenD. G.BryantP. C.VardamanJ. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.51827775
3.
AllenD. G.GriffethR. (2001). Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1014
4.
AllenD. G.HancockJ. I.VardamanJ. M.MckeeD. N. (2014). Analytical mindsets in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1912
5.
AllenD. G.WeeksK. P.MoffittK. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.980
6.
BarrickM. R.StewartG. L.PiotrowskiM. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43
7.
BarrickM. R.ZimmermanR. D. (2009). Hiring for retention and performance. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20275
8.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB. (2011). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (Vol. 3, pp. 51–64): American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-002
9.
BauerT. N.GreenS. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567. https://doi.org/10.5465/257068
10.
BeckerW. J.CropanzanoR. (2011). Dynamic aspects of voluntary turnover: An integrated approach to curvilinearity in the performance–turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.037/a0021223
11.
BoswellW. R.ZimmermanR. D.SwiderB. W. (2012). Employee job search: Toward an understanding of search context and search objectives. Journal of Management, 38(1), 129–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311421829
12.
BreaughJ. A. (2009). The use of biodata for employee selection: Past research and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 19(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.02.003
13.
CampionM. A. (1991). Meaning and measurement of turnover: Comparison of alternative measures and recommendations for research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.199
14.
DaltonD. R.TodorW. D. (1979). Turnover turned over: An expanded and positive perspective. Academy of Management Review, 4(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4289021
15.
DessG. G.ShawJ. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845830
16.
DulebohnJ. H.BommerW. H.LidenR. C.BrouerR. L.FerrisG. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
17.
FeldmanD.KlaasB. (1999). The impact of exit questionnaire procedures on departing employees’ self-disclosure. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11(1), 13–25.
18.
GregurasG. J.DiefendorffJ. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014068
19.
GriffethR. W.HomP. W.GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Updated moderator tests and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
20.
HausknechtJ. P.RoddaJ.HowardM. J. (2009). Targeted employee retention: Performance-based and job-related differences in reported reasons for staying. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20279
21.
HoffmanB. J.BlairC. A.MeriacJ. P.WoehrD. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain: A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.555
22.
HoltomB. C.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.EberlyM. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211552
23.
HomP. W.LeeT. W.ShawJ. D.HausknechtJ. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
24.
HomP. W.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.GriffethR. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027983
25.
JackofskyE. F. (1984). Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277940
26.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https//:doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
27.
KulikC. T.RaeB.SardeshmukhS. R.PereraS. (2015). Can we still be friends? The role of exit conversations in facilitating post-exit relationships. Human Resource Management, 54(6), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21642
28.
LawlerE. E. (2015, July 21). Rethinking Employee Turnover. Online: Forbes
29.
LeeT. H.GerhartB.WellerI.TrevorC. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.33665124
30.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410122008
31.
LePineJ. A.PodsakoffN. P.LePineM. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
32.
LePineJ. A.Van DyneL. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional theory model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011953
MaertzC. P.CampionM. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: Integrating content and process turnover theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159602
35.
MaertzC. P.GriffethR. W.CampbellN. S.AllenD. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.472
36.
MaertzC. P.KmittaK. (2012). Integrating turnover reasons and shocks with turnover process. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.002
37.
McEvoyG. M.CascioW. F. (1985). Strategies for reducing employee turnover: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.342
38.
MitchellT. R.HoltomB. C.LeeT. W. (2001). How to keep your best employees: Developing an effective retention policy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5897929
39.
MobleyW. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
40.
NiedermanF. A.SumnerM.MaertzC. P. (2007). Testing and extending the unfolding model of voluntary turnover to IT professionals. Human Resource Management, 46(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20167
41.
NybergA. J. (2010). Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance–job satisfaction–voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018869
42.
PodsakoffN. P.LePineJ. A.LePineM. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
43.
PorterC. M.WooS. E.CampionM. (2016). Internal and external networking differentially predict turnover through job embeddedness and job offers. Personnel Psychology, 69(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12121
44.
PremackS. L.WanousJ. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 706–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.706
45.
RaffieeJ.CoffR. (2016). Micro-foundations of firm-specific human capital: When do employees perceive their skills to be firm-specific?Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 766–790. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0286
46.
RobersonL.GalvinB. M.CharlesA. C. (2007). When group identities matter: Bias in performance appraisal. Acta Medica Academica, 1(1), 617–650. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559818
47.
RobinsonS. L.KraatzM. S.RousseauD. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/256773
SajjadianiS.SojournerA. J.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D.MykereziE. (2019). Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), 1207–1225. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000405
50.
SalaminA.HomP. W. (2005). In search of the elusive U-shaped performance-turnover relationship: Are high performing Swiss bankers more liable to quit?Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1204–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1204
51.
ShawJ. D.DineenB. R.FangR.VellellaR. V. (2009). Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44635525
52.
SlichterS. H (1919). The Turnover of Factory Labor. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Co
53.
SpainE.GroysbergB. (2016). Making exit interviews count. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 88–95
54.
StaufenbielT.KonigC. J. (2010). A model for the effects of job insecurity on performance, turnover intention, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908x401912
55.
SteelR. P.GriffethR. W.HomP. W. (2002). Practical retention policy for the practical manager. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.7173588
56.
SuddabyR. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.51141319
57.
TrevorC. O.GerhartB.BoudreauJ. W. (1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.44
58.
WangM.ZahnY.McCuneE.TruxilloD. (2011). Understanding newcomers’ adaptability and work-related outcomes: Testing the mediating roles of perceived P-E fit variables. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01205.x
59.
WestabyJ. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003
60.
WickertC.PostC.DohJ. P.PrescottJ. E.PrencipeA. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12666
61.
WilliamsC. R.LivingstoneL. P. (1994). Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.5465/256830
62.
WooS. E.ChaeM.JebbA. T.KimY. (2016). A closer look at the personality-turnover relationship: Criterion expansion, dark traits, and time. Journal of Management, 42(2), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315622985
63.
ZimmermanR. D. (2008). Understanding the impact of personality traits on individuals’ turnover decisions: A meta‐analytic path model. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 309–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00115.x
64.
ZimmermanR. D.SwiderB. W.ArthurJ. B. (2020). Does turnover destination matter? Differentiating antecedents of occupational change versus organizational change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103470
65.
ZimmermanR. D.SwiderB. W.BoswellW. R. (2019). Synthesizing content models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21938
