Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-12
Does Anyone Care About External Validity? A Call (or Plea?) for More OB/HR Research From Multiple Organizations/Industries,Panels,and Publicly Available Datasets
BergmanM. E.JeanV. A. (2016). Where have all the "workers" gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial-organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 84–113. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.70.
2.
BernerthJ. B.AguinisH. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103.
3.
BrowneM. N.KeeleyS. M. (2018). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (12th ed.). New York: Pearson.
CruzK. S.PintoJ. (2019). Team focus in focus: Its implications for real teams and their members. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(2), 123–133. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a14.
6.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.HoodA. C. (2020). Aggregate perceptions of intrateam conflict and individual team member perceptions of team psychological contract breach: The moderating role of individual team member perceptions of team support. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(1), 77–86. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a7.
7.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.ScottK. L.ThoroughgoodC. N.CheungJ. (2018). Perceptions of psychological contract breach and perceptions of co-worker exclusion: The moderating effects of collectivism and individualism. Occupational Health Science, 2(3), 233–245. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0024-6.
8.
Department of Trade and Industry (2005). Workplace employment Relations survey: Cross-section, 2004. Available at:http://www.niesr.ac.uk/.
PitariuA. H.PloyhartR. E. (2010). Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36(2), 405–429. https://dx.doi.org/1177/0149206308331096.
12.
PloyhartR. E.VandenbergR. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: Theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94–120. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110.
13.
PloyhartR. E.WardA.-K. (2011). The "quick start guide" for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(4), 413–422. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9209-6.
14.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
15.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
16.
PorterC. O. L. H.OutlawR.GaleJ. P.ChoT. S. (2019). The use of online panel data in management research: A review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 45(1), 319–344. https://dx.doi.org/doi/10.1177/0149206318811569.
17.
SchabramK.RobinsonS. L.CruzK. S. (2018). Honor among thieves: The interaction of team and member deviance on trust in the team. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 1057–1066. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000311.
18.
ScottK. L.ZagenczykT. J.SchippersM.PurvisR. L.CruzK. S. (2014). Co-worker exclusion and employee outcomes: An investigation of the moderating roles of perceived organizational and social support. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1235–1256. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12099.
19.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Trust or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955.
20.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8.
21.
WalterS. L.SeibertS. E.GoeringD.O’BoyleE. H.,Jr. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge?Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9552-y.
22.
ZagenczykT. J.CruzK. S.WoodardA. M.WalkerJ. C.FewW. T.KiazadK.RajaM. (2013). The moderating effect of Machiavellianism on the psychological contract breach-organizational identification/disidentification relationships. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(3), 287–299. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9278-1.