Drawing upon social information processing theory, this study builds a multilevel model to explore the effects of humble leader behavior on performance in teams. Time-lagged and multi-source data were gathered from 298 employees across 70 work teams. Results indicated that at the individual level, humble leader behavior was positively related to individual performance via organization-based self-esteem, while at the team level, humble leader behavior was positively related to team performance via team potency. Moreover, team cognitive diversity moderated the indirect effects of humble leader behavior on individual and team performances, such that the positive indirect effects were stronger for teams with high cognitive diversity than for those with low cognitive diversity. Implications and limitations are also discussed.
AggarwalI.WoolleyA. W. (2019). Team creativity, cognition, and cognitive style diversity. Management Science, 65(4), 1586-1599. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.3001
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AlonI.ChildJ.LiS.McIntyreJ. R. (2011). Globalization of Chinese firms theoretical universalism or particularism. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 191-200. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00234.x
4.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440-450. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
5.
AndersonB. S.WennbergK.McMullenJ. S. (2019). Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001
6.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
7.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB.LidenR. C.WayneS. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: Leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298-310. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.298
8.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142-163. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142
9.
BehfarK. J.MannixE. A.PetersonR. S.TrochimW. M. (2011). Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127-176. doi:10.1177/1046496410389194
10.
BharanitharanK.ChenZ. X.BahmanniaS.LoweK. B. (2019). Is leader humility a friend or foe, or both? An attachment theory lens on leader humility and its contradictory outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 720-743. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3925-z
11.
BinnewiesC.OhlyS.NiessenC. (2008). Age and creativity at work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(4), 438-457. doi:10.1108/02683940810869042
12.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
BoekhorstJ. A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241-264. doi:10.1002/hrm.21669
14.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571. doi:10.2307/30040649
15.
BowlingN. A.EschlemanK. J.WangQ.KirkendallC.AlarconG. (2010). A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601-626. doi:10.1348/096317909X454382
16.
BrislinR.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp.389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
BurkeC. S.SimsD. E.LazzaraE. H.SalasE. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006
18.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-847. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
19.
ChandlerJ. A.PetrenkoO. V.HillA. D.HayesN. (2020). CEO Machiavellianism and strategic alliances in family firms. Family Business Review, 34, 93. doi:10.1177/0894486520938890
20.
ChanS. C. H.HuangX.SnapeE.LamC. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128. doi:10.1002/job.1797
21.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351-386. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
22.
ChenG.KirkmanB. L.KanferR.AllenD.RosenB. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
23.
ChiuC.-Y.OwensB. P.TeslukP. E. (2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1705-1720. doi:10.1037/apl0000159
24.
ChunJ. U.YammarinoF. J.DionneS. D.SosikJ. J.MoonH. K. (2009). Leadership across hierarchical levels: Multiple levels of management and multiple levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 689-707. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.003
25.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N.MenonS. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747-767. doi:10.1002/1099-1379(200011)21:7<747::AID-JOB46>3.0.CO;2-J
26.
CopelandJ. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 264-277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.264
27.
DayD. V. (2000). Leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
28.
De DreuC. K. W. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 628-638. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628
29.
De DreuC. K. W.WeingartL. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
30.
DeChurchL. A.HillerN. J.MuraseT.DotyD.SalasE. (2010). Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1069-1085. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009
31.
Den HartogD. N.De HooghA. H. B.BelschakF. D. (2020). Toot your own horn? Leader narcissism and the effectiveness of employee self-promotion. Journal of Management, 46(2), 261-286. doi:10.1177/0149206318785240
32.
ExlineJ. J.GeyerA. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3(2), 95-114. doi:10.1080/13576500342000077
33.
GardnerD. G.PierceJ. L. (1998). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 48-70. doi:10.1177/1059601198231004
34.
GibsonC. B.EarleyP. C. (2007). Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351397
35.
GistM. E.MitchellT. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279530
36.
GootyJ.ConnellyS.GriffithJ.GuptaA. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979-1004. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005
37.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
38.
GrijalvaE.HarmsP. D.NewmanD. A.GaddisB. H.FraleyR. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1-47. doi:10.1111/peps.12072
39.
GullyS. M.IncalcaterraK. A.JoshiA.BeaubienJ. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819-832. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
40.
GuzzoR. A.YostP. R.CampbellR. J.SheaG. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87-106. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x
41.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
42.
HarrisonD. A.PriceK. H.GavinJ. H.FloreyA. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045. doi:10.5465/3069328
43.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
44.
HittM. A.BeamishP. W.JacksonS. E.MathieuJ. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385-1399. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.28166219
45.
HoeverI. J.Van KnippenbergD.Van GinkelW. P.BarkemaH. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982-996. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2010.54495091
46.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623-641. doi:10.1177/014920639802400504
47.
HorwitzS. K.HorwitzI. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987-1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587
48.
HuJ.ErdoganB.JiangK.BauerT. N.LiuS. (2017). Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 313-323. doi:10.1037/apl0000277
49.
HuJ.LidenR. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 851-862. doi:10.1037/a0022465
50.
HülshegerU. R.AndersonN.SalgadoJ. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978
51.
IshakN. A.AlamS. S. (2009). Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating impact of self-esteem. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 52-61. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v4n3p52
52.
JanssenO.Van YperenN. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384. doi:10.2307/20159587
53.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. doi:10.2307/2667054
54.
JinY.LiuH.GuJ. (2017). A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: The roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), 610-629. doi:10.1108/LODJ-10-2015-0229
55.
JoshiA.RohH. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491
56.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
57.
KearneyE.GebertD. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77-89. doi:10.1037/a0013077
58.
KetokiviM.McIntoshC. N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001
59.
KimE.GlombT. M. (2014). Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 619-634. doi:10.1037/a0035789
60.
KnippenbergD. V.KnippenbergB. V.CremerD. D.HoggM. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825-856. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
61.
KormanA. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 31-41. doi:10.1037/h0028656
62.
KormanA. K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 50-63. doi:10.5465/amr.1976.4408762
63.
LauR. S.CobbA. T. (2010). Understanding the connections between relationship conflict and performance: The intervening roles of trust and exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 898-917. doi:10.1002/job.674
64.
LearyM. R.DownsD. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive. In Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123-144). Boston, MA: Springer.
65.
LeeJ.PecceiR. (2007). Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 661-685. doi:10.1002/job.431
66.
LevittR. E.CohenG. P.KunzJ. C.NassC. I.ChristiansenT.JinY. (1994). The “virtual design team”: Simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In CarleyK. M.PrietulaM. J. (Eds.), Computational organization theory (pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67.
LinX.ChenZ. X.TseH. H. M.WeiW.MaC. (2019). Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The roles of personal sense of power and power distance. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 937-950. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2
68.
LiuC. (2016). Does humble leadership behavior promote employees’ voice behavior? - A dual mediating model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 04(4), 731-740. doi:10.4236/ojbm.2016.44071
69.
LiuJ.HuiC.LeeC.ChenZ. X. (2013). Why do I feel valued and why do I contribute? A relational approach to employee’s organization-based self-esteem and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1018-1040. doi:10.1111/joms.12037
70.
LordR. G.FotiR. J.De VaderC. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343-378. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6
71.
LuJ. G.LiuX. L.LiaoH.WangL. (2020). Disentangling stereotypes from social reality: Astrological stereotypes and discrimination in China. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1359-1379. doi:10.1037/pspi0000237
72.
MarkhamS. E.YammarinoF. J.MurryW. D.PalanskiM. E. (2010). Leader-member exchange, shared values, and performance: Agreement and levels of analysis do matter. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 469-480. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.010
73.
MehraA.SmithB. R.DixonA. L.RobertsonB. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 0-245. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
74.
MelloA. L.RentschJ. R. (2015). Cognitive diversity in teams. Small Group Research, 46(6), 623-658. doi:10.1177/1046496415602558
75.
MillikenF. J.MartinsL. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217
76.
MitchellR.NicholasS. (2006). Knowledge creation in groups: The value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory and open-mindedness norms. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 67-74.
77.
MorelandR. L.LevineJ. M.WingertM. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In DavisJ.WitteE. (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 11-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78.
MorgesonF. P.DerueD. S.KaramE. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5-39. doi:10.1177/0149206309347376
79.
MorrisJ. A.BrotheridgeC. M.UrbanskiJ. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323-1350. doi:10.1177/0018726705059929
80.
MossS.RitossaD.NguS. (2006). The effect of follower regulatory focus and extraversion on leadership behavior. Journal of Individual Differences, 27(2), 93-107. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.27.2.93
81.
MuellerJ.RenzlB.WillM. G. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership: A meta-review applying static and dynamic multi-level perspectives. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 37-59. doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0297-9
82.
OcB.BashshurM. R.DanielsM. A.GregurasG. J.DiefendorffJ. M. (2015). Leader humility in Singapore. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 68-80. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.11.005
83.
OuA. Y.TsuiA. S.KinickiA. J.WaldmanD. A.XiaoZ.SongL. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34-72. doi:10.1177/0001839213520131
84.
OwensB. P.HekmanD. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787-818. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441
85.
OwensB. P.HekmanD. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1088-1111. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0660
86.
OwensB. P.JohnsonM. D.MitchellT. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
87.
OwensB. P.WallaceA. S.WaldmanD. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1203-1213. doi:10.1037/a0038698
88.
OwensB. P.YamK. C.BednarJ. S.MaoJ.HartD. W. (2019). The impact of leader moral humility on follower moral self-efficacy and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 146-163. doi:10.1037/apl0000353
89.
PearceC. L.GallagherC. A.EnsleyM. D. (2002). Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 115-119. doi:10.1348/096317902167685
90.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28. doi:10.2307/2667029
91.
PetrenkoO. V.AimeF.RecendesT.ChandlerJ. A. (2019). The case for humble expectations: CEO humility and market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 1938-1964. doi:10.1002/smj.3071
92.
PfefferJ. (1983). Organizational demography. In Research in organizational behavior (pp. 299-357). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
93.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591-622. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
94.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.CummingsL. L.DunhamR. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648. doi:10.2307/256437
95.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.DunhamR. B.CummingsL. L. (1993). Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition-employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 271-288. doi:10.2307/256523
96.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
97.
PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77-98. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
98.
QinX.ChenC.YamK. C.HuangM.JuD. (2020). The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 693-712. doi:10.1037/apl0000456
99.
RauD. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(36), 746-771. doi:10.1177/1046496405281776
100.
RegoA.OwensB.LealS.MeloA. I.CunhaM. P. E.GonçalvesL.RibeiroP. (2017). How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: A moderated mediation model. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 639-658. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.002
101.
RiggsM. L.KnightP. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755-766. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.755
102.
SajonsG. B. (2020). Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101348. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101348
103.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. doi:10.2307/2392563
104.
SchilpzandM. C.MartinsL. L. (2010). Cognitive diversity and team performance: The roles of team mental models and information processing mechanisms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 1-6). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
105.
SchippersM. C.EdmondsonA. C.WestM. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45(6), 731-769. doi:10.1177/1046496414553473
106.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. doi:10.2307/256701
107.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects[Computer software]. Retrieved from: http://quantpsy.org/
SheltonP. M.WaiteA. M.MakelaC. J. (2010). Highly effective teams: A relational analysis of group potency and perceived organizational support. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(1), 93-114. doi:10.1177/1523422310365665
110.
ShinS. J.KimT.-Y.LeeJ.-Y.BianL. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197-212. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0270
111.
SimonsT. L.PetersonR. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
112.
SivasubramaniamN.MurryW. D.AvolioB. J.JungD. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 66-96. doi:10.1177/1059601102027001005
113.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C.WayneS. J.KraimerM. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325. doi:10.2307/3069458
114.
SuiY.WangH. (2014). Relational evaluation, organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 17-28. doi:10.1177/1548051813486833
115.
SwannW. B.JrPolzerJ. T.SeyleD. C.KoS. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. The Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 9-27. doi:10.2307/20159006
116.
TakeuchiR.ChenG.LepakD. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01127.x
117.
TangneyJ. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70-82. doi:10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.70
118.
TegardenD. P.TegardenL. F.SheetzS. D. (2009). Cognitive factions in a top management team: Surfacing and analyzing cognitive diversity using causal maps. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18(6), 537-566. doi:10.1007/s10726-007-9099-1
119.
TrösterC.MehraA.van KnippenbergD. (2014). Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 245-255. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.04.003
120.
TsuiA. S.LauC. M. (2002). Research on the management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China: Current status and future directions. In The management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 1-27). Boston, MA: Springer.
121.
Van DierendonckD. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261. doi:10.1177/0149206310380462
122.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. doi:10.2307/256902
123.
Van KnippenbergD.SchippersM. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
124.
WangX. F. H.HowellJ. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 775-790. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001
125.
WangX. F. H.KimT. Y.LeeD. R. (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231-3239. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.026
126.
WangL.OwensB. P.LiJ. J.ShiL. (2018). Exploring the affective impact, boundary conditions, and antecedents of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 1019-1038. doi:10.1037/apl0000314
127.
WalkerB. (1992). Hua hu ching: The unknown teachings of Lao Tzu. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
128.
WilkesC. G. (1998). Jesus on leadership. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.
129.
WilliamsK. Y.O’ReillyC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
130.
YammarinoF. J.DansereauF. (2008). Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 135-141. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.001
131.
YoshidaD. T.SendjayaS.HirstG.CooperB. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1395-1404. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013
132.
ZaccaroS. J.BlairV.PetersonC.ZazanisM. (1995). Collective efficacy. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 305-328). Boston, MA: Springer.
133.
ZaccaroS. J.HeinenB.ShufflerM. (2009). Team leadership and team effectiveness. In SalasE.GoodwinG. F.BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 83-111). New York: Routledge.
