Chief executive officer (CEO) personality has emerged as a key predictor of firm performance. A burgeoning literature rooted in psychology has shown that leaders with the dark triad personality traits (i.e., narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) can have harmful effects on organizations. However, scholars have not fully illuminated the “black box” of processes that explain how and why CEO dark personality matters. Specifically, we know little about the microfoundations of CEOs’ influence: how and why do the effects of CEO dark personality cascade down to affect employees and outcomes throughout the different levels of the firm. Therefore, we explore how CEOs’ personalities shape their relationships with other top management team (TMT) members and how these relationships affect other employees in the organization. Specifically, drawing on upper echelons theory and social exchange theory, we provide a multilevel theoretical model examining how distinct CEO dark triad traits shape CEO–TMT exchange quality, TMT destructive leadership, TMT behavioral integration, subordinates’ counterproductive work behaviors, and ultimately firm performance. Implications for theory, future research, and practice also are discussed.
AhsanM. (2017). The right people at the right time—The place does not matter. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0276
2.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/259136
3.
AnglinA. H.WolfeM. T.ShortJ. C.McKennyA. F.PidduckR. J. (2018). Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 780–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004
4.
AntoncicB.HisrichR. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
5.
AmernicJ. H.CraigR. J. (2010). Accounting as a facilitator of extreme narcissism. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0450-0
6.
AmernicJ.CraigR. (2013). Leadership discourse, culture, and corporate ethics: CEO-speak at news corporation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1506-0
7.
AustinE. J.FarrellyD.BlackC.MooreH. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-paid.2006.11.019
8.
BabiakP.HareR. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. Regan Books.
9.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016338
10.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
11.
BalshemM. (1988). The clerical worker’s boss: An agent of job stress. Human Organization, 47(4), 361–367.
BazermanM. H. (2002). Judgment in managerial decision making. Wiley.
14.
BerryC. M.CarpenterN. C.BarrattC. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026739
15.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
16.
BoddyC. R. (2011). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101006895
17.
BoddyC. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1688-0
18.
BoddyC. R. (2017). Psychopathic leadership a case study of a corporate psychopath CEO. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2908-6
19.
BroermanR. L.RossS. R.CorrP. J. (2014). Throwing more light on the dark side of psychopathy: An extension of previous findings for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.024
20.
BusenbarkJ. R.KrauseR.BoivieS.GraffinS. D. (2016). Toward a configurational perspective on the CEO: A review and synthesis of the management literature. Journal of Management, 42(1), 234–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315618448
21.
BuylT.BooneC.WadeJ. B. (2019). CEO narcissism, risk-taking, and resilience: An empirical analysis in US commercial banks. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1372–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699521
22.
CarmeliA. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108325696
23.
CarmeliA.SchaubroeckJ. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.001
24.
CastilleC. M.BucknerJ. E.ThoroughgoodC. N. (2018). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9
25.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
26.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534
27.
ChatterjeeA.PollockT. G. (2017). Master of puppets: How narcissistic CEOs construct their professional worlds. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0224
28.
ChenS. (2010). The role of ethical leadership versus institutional constraints: A simulation study of financial misreporting by CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0625-8
29.
CohenA. (2018). Counterproductive work behaviors. Routledge.
30.
ColbertA. E.BarrickM. R.BradleyB. H. (2014). Personality and leadership composition in top management teams: Implications for organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 67, 351–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12036
31.
CongletonA. (2014). Beyond business ethics: An agenda for the trustworthy teachers and practitioners of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1591-0
32.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
33.
DahlingJ. J.WhitakerB. G.LevyP. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618
34.
DetertJ. R.TrevinoL. K.BurrisE. R.AndiappanM. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.993
35.
de WitF. R.GreerL. L.JehnK. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844
36.
DuffyM. K.GansterD. C.PagonM. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069350
37.
ElbannaS.ChildJ. (2007). Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 431–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.597
38.
EngelenA.NeumannC.SchmidtS. (2016). Should entrepreneurially oriented firms have narcissistic CEOs?Journal of Management, 42(3), 698–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495413
39.
GalvinB. M.LangeD.AshforthB. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0103
40.
GerstnerW. C.KönigA.EndersA.HambrickD. C. (2013). CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 257–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213488773
41.
GreenbaumR. L.HillA.MawritzM. B.QuadeM. J. (2017). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management, 43(2), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535434
42.
GrijalvaE.MaynesT. D.BaduraK. L.WhitingS. W. (2019). Examining the “I” in team: A longitudinal investigation of the influence of team narcissism composition on team outcomes in the NBA. Academy of Management Journal, 1–57. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0218
43.
GuptaA.MisangyiV. F. (2018). Follow the leader (or not): The influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1437–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2765
44.
GuptaA.NadkarniS.MariamM. (2019). Dispositional sources of managerial discretion: CEO ideology, CEO personality, and firm strategies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 855–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218793128
45.
HambrickD. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171-214), JAI Press.
46.
HambrickD. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159303
47.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS.MooneyA. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.17293355
48.
HambrickD. C.HumphreyS. E.GuptaA. (2015). Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2230
49.
HambrickD. C.LovelaceJ. (2018). The role of executive symbolism in advancing new strategic themes in organizations: A social influence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0190
50.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
51.
HarmsP. D.CredéM.TynanM.LeonM.JeungW. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006
52.
HarrisonJ. S.ThurgoodG. R.BoivieS.PfarrerM. D. (2019). Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1316-1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3023
53.
HillA. D.PetrenkoO.RidgeJ. W.AimeF. (2019). Videometric measurement of individual characteristics in difficult to access subject pools: Demonstrating with CEOs. In KetchenD.BerghD. (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 39–61). Emerald Group Publishing.
54.
HillerN. J.HambrickD. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.455
55.
HolmesR. M.Jr.BromileyP.DeversC. E.HolcombT. R.McGuireJ. B. (2011). Management theory applications of prospect theory: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1069–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394863
56.
HooblerJ. M.BrassD. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125
57.
HunterE. M.PenneyL. M. (2014). The waiter spit in my soup! Antecedents of customer-directed counterproductive work behavior. Human Performance, 27(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.913595
58.
IngersollA. R.GlassC.CookA.OlsenK. J. (2019). Power, status and expectations: How narcissism manifests among women CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3730-0
59.
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
60.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609347591
61.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
62.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(1), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
63.
KetchenD. J.SnowC. C.StreetV. L. (2004). Improving firm performance by matching strategic decision-making processes to competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Executive, 18(4), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.15268671
64.
KiazadK.RestubogS. L. D.ZagenczykT. J.KiewitzC.TangR. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.004
65.
KimS. L.KimM.YunS. (2015). Knowledge sharing, abusive supervision, and support: A social exchange perspective. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 599–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115577514
66.
KnightD.PearceC. L.SmithK. G.OlianJ. D.SimsH. P.SmithK. A.FloodP. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:53.0.CO;2-V
67.
LandayK.HarmsP. D.CredéM. (2019). Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000357
68.
LeBretonJ. M.ShiverdeckerL. K.GrimaldiE. M. (2018). The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
69.
LeckeltM.KüfnerA. C.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 856–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000057
70.
LewinA. Y.StephensC. U. (1994). CEO attitudes as determinants of organization design: An integrated model. Organization Studies, 15(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500202
71.
LiJ.HambrickD. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803923
72.
LovelaceJ. B.BundyJ.HambrickD. C.PollockT. G. (2018). The shackles of CEO celebrity: Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0064
73.
MackeyJ. D.McAllisterC. P.MaherL. P.WangG. (2019). Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12286
74.
Marquez-IllescasG.ZebedeeA. A.ZhouL. (2019). Hear me write: Does CEO narcissism affect disclosure?Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3796-3
75.
MathieuC.BabiakP. (2016). The rise of the dark knight: Corporate psychopathy, leadership, and abusive supervision. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.224
76.
MawritzM. B.MayerD. M.HooblerJ. M.WayneS. J.MarinovaS. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 325–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01246.x
77.
McHoskeyJ. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021338809469
78.
MillerD.FriesenP. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
79.
MitchellM. S.AmbroseM. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
80.
MuravenM.GagnéM.RosmanH. (2008). Helpful self-control: Autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.008
81.
NavisC.OzbekO. V. (2016). The right people in the wrong places: The paradox of entrepreneurial entry and successful opportunity realization. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 109–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0175
82.
NavisC.OzbekO. V. (2017). Why context matters: Overconfidence, narcissism, and the role of objective uncertainty in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0208
83.
NdoforJ. A.SirmonD. G.HeX. (2015). Utilizing the firm’s resources: How TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1656–1674. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2304
84.
NevickaB.Van VianenA. E.De HooghA. H.VoornB. (2018). Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000298
85.
O’BoyleE. H.Jr.ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.McDanielM. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
86.
OesterleM. J.ElosgeC.ElosgeL. (2016.). Me, myself and I: The role of CEO narcissism in internationalization decisions. International Business Review, 25(5), 1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.02.001
87.
O’ReillyC. A.IIICaldwellD. F.ChatmanJ. A.DoerrB. (2014). The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114550713
88.
O’ReillyC. A.IIIDoerrB.ChatmanJ. A. (2018). “See You in Court”: How CEO narcissism increases firms’ vulnerability to lawsuits. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.08.001
89.
OuA. Y.SeoJ.ChoiD.HomP. W. (2017). When can humble top executives retain middle managers? The moderating role of top management team faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1915–1931. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1072
90.
OuA. Y.TsuiA. S.KinickiA. J.WaldmanD. A.XiaoZ.SongL. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213520131
91.
PalmerJ. C.KomarrajuM.CarterM. Z.KarauS. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the dark triad traits and counterproductive work behavior?Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.018
92.
ParkH.HooblerJ. M.WuJ.LidenR. C.HuJ.WilsonM. S. (2019). Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2
93.
PatelP. C.CooperD. (2014). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: Approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1528–1540. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2162
94.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
95.
PenneyL. M.SpectorP. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.336
96.
PervinL. A. (1990). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press.
97.
PetersonR. S.SmithD. B.MartoranaP. V.OwensP. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.795
98.
PetersonS. J.GalvinB. M.LangeD. (2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01253.x
99.
PetrenkoO. V.AimeF.RidgeJ.HillA. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2348
100.
PryorC.HolmesR. M.Jr.WebbJ. W.LiguoriE. W. (2019). Top executive goal orientations’ effects on environmental scanning and performance: Differences between founders and non-founders. Journal of Management, 45(5), 1958–1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317737354
101.
QuigleyT. J.HambrickD. C. (2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2258
102.
RavalV. (2018). A disposition-based fraud model: Theoretical integration and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3199-2
103.
ReinaC. S.PetersonS. J.ZhangZ. (2017). Adverse effects of CEO family-to-work conflict on firm performance. Organization Science, 28(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1114
104.
ReinaC. S.ZhangZ.PetersonS. J. (2014). CEO grandiose narcissism and firm performance: The role of organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 958–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.004
105.
RepettiR. L. (1993). Short-term effects of occupational stressors on daily mood and health complaints. Health Psychology, 12(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.125
106.
ResickC. J.WhitmanD. S.WeingardenS. M.HillerN. J. (2009). The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: Examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1365–1381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016238
107.
RichardP. J.DevinneyT. M.YipG. S.JohnsonG. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560
108.
RijsenbiltA.CommandeurH. (2013). Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1528-7
109.
RuppD. E.CropanzanoR. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5
110.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
111.
SimsekZ.VeigaJ. F.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993139
112.
SmithM. B.HillA. D.WallaceJ. C.RecendesT.JudgeT. A. (2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317733511
113.
SongL. J.TsuiA. S.LawK. S. (2009). Unpacking employee responses to organizational exchange mechanisms: The role of social and economic exchange perceptions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 56–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321544
114.
SpainS. M.HarmsP. D.WoodD. (2016). Stress, well-being, and the dark side of leadership. In GentryW. A.ClerkinC.PerrewéP. L.HalbeslebenJ. R. B.RosenC. C. (Eds.), The role of leadership in occupational stress (Vol. 14, pp. 33–59). Emerald Group Publishing.
115.
SpanglerW. D.GuptaA.KimD. H.NazarianS. (2012). Developing and validating historiometric measures of leader individual differences by computerized content analysis of documents. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1152–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.002
116.
SpectorP. E.FoxS. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
117.
TangY.MackD. Z.ChenG. (2018). The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1370–1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2761
118.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375
119.
TettR. P.BurnettD. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
120.
TrusslerM.SorokaS. (2014). Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214524832
121.
Van ScotterJ. R.RoglioK. D. D. (2018). CEO bright and dark personality: Effects on ethical misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–25. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4061-5
122.
VazireS.NaumannL. P.RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2008). Portrait of a narcissist: Manifestations of narcissism in physical appearance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007
123.
WalesW. J.PatelP. C.LumpkinG. T. (2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041–1069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12034
124.
WalumbwaF. O.CropanzanoR.GoldmanB. M. (2011). How leader–member exchange influences effective work behaviors: Social exchange and internal–external efficacy perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 739–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01224.x
125.
WangG.HolmesR. M.Jr.OhI. S.ZhuW. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140
126.
WestphalJ. D.DeephouseD. L. (2011). Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organization Science, 22(4), 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0563
127.
WestphalJ. D.ParkS. H.McDonaldM. L.HaywardM. L. (2012). Helping other CEOs avoid bad press: Social exchange and impression management support among CEOs in communications with journalists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 217–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212453267
128.
ZhangH.OuA. Y.TsuiA. S.WangH. (2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003
129.
ZhuD. H.ChenG. (2015a). CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(1), 31–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214554989
130.
ZhuD. H.ChenG. (2015b). Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 2075–2098. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2322
