Perceived charisma is an outcome of message content and delivery, where the latter dominates the former. Framing perception of charisma within dual-process theories, we suggest a rapid processing of delivery and a slow processing of content. We aimed to track the differential processing speed of content and delivery that accounts for the delivery dominance. In two laboratory experiments, we manipulated content and delivery. Participants reported perceived charisma after viewing a presentation (Experiment 1) or moment-by-moment during the presentation (Experiment 2). The results confirmed the immediate influence of delivery on perceived charisma that was later either supported or revised by the content. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
AmbadyN.BernieriF. J.RichesonJ. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 201-271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
3.
AntonakisJ. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 5-21.
4.
AntonakisJ.AvolioB. J.SivasubramaniamN. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.
5.
AntonakisJ.BastardozN.JacquartP.ShamirB. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293-319.
6.
AntonakisJ.FenleyM.LiechtiS. (2011). Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 374-396.
7.
ArielyD. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
8.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
9.
AwamlehR.GardnerW. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 345-373.
10.
AymanR.KorabikK.MorrisS. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 852-879.
11.
BallewC. C.TodorovA. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 17948-17953.
12.
BaronJ. (2007). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1995). MLQ—Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire for research: Permission set. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
15.
BassB. M.StogdillR. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research & managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press.
16.
BaurJ. E.EllenB. P.BuckleyM. R.FerrisG. R.AllisonT. H.McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C. (2016). More than one way to articulate a vision: A configurations approach to leader charismatic rhetoric and influence. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 156-171.
17.
BenjaminD. J.ShapiroJ. M. (2009). Thin-slice forecasts of gubernatorial elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 523-536.
18.
BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C.MeindlJ. R. (2004). Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11 th terrorist attacks. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 211-239.
19.
BöhmS. A.DwertmannD. J.BruchH.ShamirB. (2015). The missing link? Investigating organizational identity strength and transformational leadership climate as mechanisms that connect CEO charisma with firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 156-171.
20.
BonettD. G. (2010). Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability. Psychological Methods, 15, 368-385.
21.
BonnerC.NewellB. R. (2010). In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making. Memory & Cognition, 38, 186-196.
22.
BrownD. J. (2013). Leadership and followership from a social cognition perspective: A dual process account. In RumseyM. G. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership (pp. 103-121). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
CarlessS. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39, 887-902.
24.
CartonA. M.MurphyC.ClarkJ. R. (2014). A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1544-1570.
25.
CastelnovoO.PopperM.KorenD. (2017). The innate code of charisma. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 543-554.
26.
ClarkT.GreatbatchD. (2011). Audience perceptions of charismatic and non-charismatic oratory: The case of management gurus. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 22-32.
27.
ColavitaF. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 409-412.
28.
CongerJ. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 44-55.
29.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1987). Towards a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organisational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
30.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N.& Associates (Eds.). (1988). Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
DavisK. M.GardnerW. L. (2012). Charisma under crisis revisited: Presidential leadership, perceived leader effectiveness, and contextual influences. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 918-933.
32.
DeeseJ. (1984). Thought into speech: The psychology of a language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
DeichmannD.StamD. (2015). Leveraging transformational and transactional leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 204-219.
34.
De NeysW. (2012). Bias and conflict a case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28-38.
35.
EpitropakiO.MartinR. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 293-310.
36.
EvansJ. S. B. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339.
37.
EvansJ. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
38.
EvansJ. S. B.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241.
39.
FelfeJ.SchynsB. (2010). Followers’ personality and the perception of transformational leadership: Further evidence for the similarity hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 21, 393-410.
40.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 32-58.
41.
GemmillG.OakleyJ. (1992). Leadership: An alienating social myth?Human Relations, 45, 113-129.
42.
GraboA.SpisakB. R.van VugtM. (2017). Charisma as signal: An evolutionary perspective on charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 473-485.
43.
HammR. M. (1988). Moment-by-moment variation in experts’ analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 18, 757-776.
44.
HolladayS. J.CoombsW. T. (1993). Communicating visions an exploration of the role of delivery in the creation of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 405-427.
45.
HolladayS. J.CoombsW. T. (1994). Speaking of visions and visions being spoken an exploration of the effects of content and delivery on perceptions of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 165-189.
46.
HornD.MathisC. J.RobinsonS. L.RandleN. (2015). Is charismatic leadership effective when workers are pressured to be good citizens?The Journal of Psychology, 149, 751-774.
47.
HouseR. J.ShamirB. (1993). Toward the integration of charismatic, visionary and transformational leadership theories. In ChemersM. M.AymanR. (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 87-107). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48.
HowellJ. M. (1988). Two faces of charisma: Socialized and personalized leadership in organizations. In CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. & Associates (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 213-236). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
HowellJ. M.ShamirB. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30, 96-112.
50.
JohnsonS. K.DipboyeR. L. (2008). Effects of charismatic content and delivery on follower task performance the moderating role of task charisma conduciveness. Group & Organization Management, 33, 77-106.
51.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.KosalkaT. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855-875.
52.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
53.
KerenG.SchulY. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533-550.
54.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
55.
KruglanskiA. W.GigerenzerG. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97-109.
56.
LaverJ. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LordR. G.MaherK. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perception and performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
58.
MartinkoM. J.Randolph-SengB.ShenW.BreesJ. R.MahoneyK. T.KesslerS. R. (2018). An examination of the influence of implicit theories, attribution styles, and performance cues on questionnaire measures of leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25, 116-133.
59.
MelnikoffD. E.BarghJ. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 280-293.
60.
MurphyN. A.HallJ. A.MastM. S.RubenM. A.FrauendorferD.Blanch-HartiganD.. . . NguyenL. (2015). Reliability and validity of nonverbal thin slices in social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 199-213.
61.
NagelF.MaurerM.ReinemannC. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62, 833-850.
62.
OsmanM. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 988-1010.
63.
OveraH.CookR. (2018). Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?Cognition, 170, 190-200.
64.
PeckJ. A.HogueM. (2018). Acting with the best of intentions . . . or not: A typology and model of impression management in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 123-134.
65.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
66.
PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.YeadonC.Hesson-McInnisM. (2004). A dual-process model of reactions to perceived stigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 436-452.
67.
RoderoE. (2012). A comparative analysis of speech rate and perception in radio bulletins. Text & Talk, 32, 391-411.
68.
RosenbergA.HirschbergJ. (2009). Charisma perception from text and speech. Speech Communication, 51, 640-655.
69.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011). Face and fortune: Inferences of personality from Managing Partners’ faces predict their law firms’ financial success. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 690-696.
70.
SchynsB.SandersK. (2007). In the eyes of the beholder: Personality and the perception of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2345-2363.
71.
ShamirB.ArthurM. B.HouseR. J. (1994). The rhetoric of charismatic leadership: A theoretical extension, a case study, and implications for research. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 25-42.
72.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
73.
SlepianM. L.BogartK. R.AmbadyN. (2014). Thin-slice judgments in the clinical context. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 131-153.
74.
SosikJ. J.DingerS. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 134-153.
75.
SpezioM. L.LoeschL.GosselinF.MattesK.AlvarezR. M. (2012). Thin-slice decisions do not need faces to be predictive of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 33, 331-341.
76.
StanovichK. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
StrangeJ. M.MumfordM. D. (2002). The origins of vision: Charismatic versus ideological leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 343-377.
79.
StrangeJ. M.MumfordM. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121-148.
80.
SyT.HortonC.RiggioR. (2018). Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 58-69.
81.
TaurozaS.AllisonD. (1990). Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics, 11, 90-105.
82.
TedescoJ. C. (2002). Televised political advertising effects: Evaluating responses during the 2000 Robb-Allen senatorial election. Journal of Advertising, 31,37-48.
83.
TodorovA. (2017). Face value: The irresistible influence of first impressions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
84.
TskhayK. O.ZhuR.RuleN. O. (2017). Perceptions of charisma from thin slices of behavior predict leadership prototypicality judgments. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 555-562.
85.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
86.
van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1-60.
87.
Van DammeS.CrombezG.SpenceC. (2009). Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?Experimental Brain Research, 193, 197-204.
88.
VenusM.StamD.van KnippenbergD. (2013). Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 53-68.
89.
VinkenburgC. J.Van EngenM. L.EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion?The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10-21.
90.
WaldmanD. A.YammarinoF. J. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24, 266-285.
91.
WalkerG. (2010). The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-troughs in English talk-in-interaction. In Barth-WeingartenD.ReberE.SeltingM. (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 51-72). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
92.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society. New York, NY: Bedminster. (Original work published 1925)
