In the present research, we replicate previous research showing that death increases attributions of a leader’s charisma and that this is mediated by followers’ perceptions of a connection between the leader and their group (identity fusion). We also extend previous research by including identity leadership as a further mediator, examining the importance of a leaders’ perceived ability to strengthen the identity of the group they lead. Predictions were tested in the unique context of the death of two former German chancellors (Helmut Schmidt, Helmut Kohl) with participants (n = 233) evaluating one of these leaders either before or after their death. Results show that the leaders’ identity leadership, identity fusion, and charisma were perceived to be significantly higher after their death. Analysis also supported the proposed serial mediation model in which condition (alive or dead) impacted charisma via identity leadership and then fusion. Results support claims that charisma is a social attribution.
AllisonSTEylonDBegganJK, et al. (2009)
The demise of leadership: Positivity and negativity biases in evaluations of dead leaders. The Leadership Quarterly20: 115–129.
2.
AllisonSTGoethalsGR (2008) Deifying the dead and downtrodden: Sympathetic figures as inspirational leaders. In CiullaJBForsythDRGenoveseMA, et al. (eds) Leadership at the Crossroads.
Westport, CT:
Praeger, pp. 181–196.
3.
AntonakisJBastardozNJacquartP, et al. (2016)
Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3: 293–319.
4.
AvolioBJBassBM (2004) Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Manual and Sampler Set.
Redwood City, CA:
Mindgarden.
5.
BarsalouLW (2008)
Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology59: 617–645.
6.
BlighMCKohlesJCPillaiR (2005)
Crisis and charisma in the California recall election. Leadership1(3): 323–352.
7.
BrewerMBGardnerW (1996)
Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71: 83–93.
8.
CarlsonJRZmudRW (1999)
Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management42: 153–170.
9.
CastelnovoOPopperMKorenD (2017)
The innate code of charisma. The Leadership Quarterly28: 543–554.
10.
EberlJMWagnerMBoomgaardenHG (2017)
Are perceptions of candidate traits shaped by the media? The effects of three types of media bias. The International Journal of Press/Politics22: 111–132.
11.
EllemersNDe GilderDHaslamSA (2004)
Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. The Academy of Management Review29: 459–478.
12.
EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (2002)
Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology53: 161–186.
13.
GómezÁBrooksMLBuhrmesterMD, et al. (2011)
On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100: 918–933.
14.
HaslamSAPlatowMJTurnerJC, et al. (2001)
Social identity and the romance of leadership: The importance of being seen to be ‘doing it for us’. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations4: 191–205.
15.
HaslamSAReicherSDPlatowMJ (2011) The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power.
Hove, England:
Psychology Press.
16.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.
New York, NY:
The Guilford Press.
17.
HewstoneMBrownR (1986) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters.
Oxford, England:
Blackwell Publishing.
18.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR (2008)
Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6: 23–60.
19.
HornseyMJJettenJ (2004)
The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review8: 248–264.
20.
KepplingerM (2007)
Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics48: 351–360.
21.
KranjecAMcDonoughL (2011)
The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics43: 735–748.
22.
LadkinD (2006)
The enchantment of the charismatic leader: Charisma reconsidered as aesthetic encounter. Leadership2: 165–179.
23.
LakensD (2014)
Grounding social embodiment. Social Cognition32: 168–183.
24.
MeindlJR (1995)
The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly6: 329–341.
25.
NeubaumGKrämerNC (2017)
Opinion climates in social media: Blending mass and interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research43: 464–476.
PlatowMJKnippenbergDHaslamSA, et al. (2006)
A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self‐categorization perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology45: 303–320.
28.
PopperMCastelnovoO (2017) The function of myths about great leaders in human culture: A cultural evolutionary perspective. Leadership. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/1742715017720309.
29.
PostmesTHaslamSASwaabRI (2005)
Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Journal of Social Psychology16: 1–42.
30.
PrenticeDAMillerDTLightdaleJR (1994)
Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20: 484–493.
31.
RehSvan QuaquebekeNGiessnerSR (2017)
The aura of charisma: A review on the embodiment perspective. The Leadership Quarterly26:486–507.
32.
ShamirBHouseRJArthurMB (1993)
The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organizational Science4: 577–594.
33.
SimontonDK (1994) Greatness: Who Makes History and Why.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
34.
SpearsREOakesPJEllemersNE, et al. (1997) The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life.
Oxford, England:
Blackwell Publishers.
35.
SteffensNKHaslamSAReicherSD (2014)
Up close and personal: Evidence that shared social identity is a basis for the ‘special’ relationship that binds followers to leaders. The Leadership Quarterly25: 296–313.
36.
SteffensNKHaslamSAReicherSD, et al. (2014)
Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly25: 1004–1025.
37.
SteffensNKPetersKHaslamSA, Vet al. (2017)
Dying for charisma: Leaders’ inspirational appeal increases post-mortem. The Leadership Quarterly28: 530–542.
38.
SwannWBBuhrmesterMD (2015)
Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science24: 52–57.
39.
SwannWBJettenJGómezA, et al. (2012)
When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review119: 441–456.
40.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation between Social Groups. Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.
London:
Academic Press.
41.
ThibaultP (2004) Brain, Mind and the Signifying Body: An Ecosocial Semiotic Theory.
London, UK:
A. & C. Black.
42.
Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD and Wetherell MS (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group. Blackwell, Oxford.
43.
TurnerJCOakesPJ (1986)
The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology25: 237–252.
44.
TurnerJCOakesPJHaslamSA, et al. (1994)
Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20: 454–463.
45.
Van KnippenbergBVan KnippenbergD (2005)
Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology90: 25–37.
46.
Van KnippenbergD (2011)
Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly22: 1078–1091.
47.
WeberM (1925) Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft [Economy and Society].
Tübingen, Germany:
Mohr Siebeck.
48.
WillnerAR (1984) The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
