This study explores team-level mechanisms linking team regulatory focus and team creativity. Drawing on the team self-regulation perspective and regulatory fit theory, the mediating roles of team exploratory and exploitative learning and the moderating effect of team bureaucracy were examined. Team-level analyses conducted on data captured from the leaders and members of 135 teams. The results showed that team exploratory learning mediates the relationship between team promotion focus and team radical creativity, whereas team exploitative learning mediates the relationship between team prevention focus and incremental creativity. Furthermore, the team bureaucratic context, including centralization and formalization, moderated the indirect relationship between team regulatory focus and team creativity. The findings improve understanding of why team regulatory focus differentially contributes to team radical and incremental creativity. The findings also provide meaningful insight into the role of team bureaucracy in the team regulatory focus–team creativity relationship.
AhearneM.MathieuJ.RappA. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945-955.
2.
ArnoldJ. A.AradS.RhoadesJ. A.DrasgowF. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.
3.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
4.
BeersmaB.HomanA. C.Van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K. (2013). Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 194-203.
5.
BlieseP. D.HalversonR. R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157-172.
6.
ChenG.KirkmanB. L.KanferR.AllenD.RosenB. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331-346.
7.
DavilaA.DitilloA. (2017). Management control systems and creativity. In HittM. A.JacksonS. E.CarmonaS.BiermanL.ShalleyC. E.WrightD. M. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of strategy implementation (pp. 393-417). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
De DreuC. K.BaasM.NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-758.
9.
DimotakisN.DavisonR. B.HollenbeckJ. R. (2012). Team structure and regulatory focus: The impact of regulatory fit on team dynamic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 421-434.
10.
FaddegonK.EllemersN.ScheepersD. (2009). Eager to be the best, or vigilant not to be the worst: The emergence of regulatory focus in disjunctive and conjunctive group tasks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 653-671.
11.
FerrisD. L.JohnsonR. E.RosenC. C.DjurdjevicE.ChangC.-H. D.TanJ. A. (2013). When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 342-353.
12.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
13.
GhemawatP.Ricart CostaJ. E. I. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 59-73.
14.
GilsonL. L.MadjarN. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21-28.
HamstraM. R. W.BolderdijkJ. W.VeldstraJ. L. (2011). Everyday risk taking as a function of regulatory focus. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 134-137.
17.
HeckmanJ. J. (1986). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
18.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
19.
HigginsE. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439-460.
20.
HirstG.van KnippenbergD.ChenC.SacramentoC. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation-creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 624-641.
21.
JansenJ. J.van Den BoschF. A.VolberdaH. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661-1674.
22.
JohnsonP. D.SmithM. B.WallaceJ. C.HillA. D.BaronR. A. (2015). A review of multilevel regulatory focus in organizations. Journal of Management, 41, 1501-1529.
23.
KellerR. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489-501.
24.
KennyD. A. (2017). MedPower: An interactive tool for the estimation of power in tests of mediation [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/MedPower/
25.
KostopoulosK. C.BozionelosN. (2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36, 385-415.
26.
LamT. W. H.ChiuC. Y. (2002). The motivational function of regulatory focus in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 138-150.
27.
LanajK.ChangC.-H.JohnsonR. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 998-1034.
28.
LiC.-R.ChuC.-P.LinC.-J. (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1186-1197.
29.
LiC.-R.LinC.-J.TienY.-H.ChenC.-M. (2017). A multilevel model of team cultural diversity and creativity: The role of climate for inclusion. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 163-179.
30.
LiC.-R.YehC.-H. (2017). Leveraging the benefits of exploratory and exploitative learning in NPD: The role of innovation field orientation. R&D Management, 47, 484-497.
31.
MadjarN.GreenbergE.ChenZ. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730-743.
32.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
33.
MehtaA.FeildH.ArmenakisA.MehtaN. (2009). Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning. Journal of Management, 35, 1026-1046.
34.
NeubertM. J.KacmarK. M.CarlsonD. S.ChonkoL. B.RobertsJ. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1220-1233.
35.
PodsakoffN. P.WhitingS. W.WelshD. T.MaiK. M. (2013). Surveying for “artifacts”: The susceptibility of the OCB-performance evaluation relationship to common rater, item, and measurement context effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 863-874.
36.
PowerJ.WaddellD. (2004). The link between self-managed work teams and learning organisations using performance indicators. The Learning Organization, 11, 244-259.
37.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115.
38.
RaffertyA. E.GriffinM. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329-354.
39.
RietzschelE. F. (2011). Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 337-345.
40.
SacramentoC. A.FayD.WestM. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 141-157.
41.
ScholerA. A.HigginsE. T. (2010). Regulatory focus in a demanding world. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 291-314). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
42.
ScholerA. A.HigginsE. T. (2011). Promotion and prevention systems: Regulatory focus dynamics within self-regulatory hierarchies. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 143-161). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
43.
ShinS. J.ZhouJ. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709-1721.
44.
ShinY. (2014). Positive group affect and team creativity: Mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Group Research, 45, 337-364.
45.
ShinY.KimM.ChoiJ. N.LeeS.-H. (2016). Does team culture matter? Roles of team culture and collective regulatory focus in team task and creative performance. Group & Organization Management, 41, 232-265.
46.
SpanjolJ.TamL.QuallsW. J.BohlmannJ. D. (2011). New product team decision making: Regulatory focus effects on number, type, and timing decisions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 623-640.
47.
SunS.PanW.WangL. L. (2011). Rethinking observed power: Concept, practice, and implications. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 7, 81-87.
48.
TuncdoganA.Van Den BoschF.VolberdaH. (2015). Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders’ exploration and exploitation activities. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 838-850.
49.
WeickK. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organization. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 41-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
