Today’s professionals require a network of mentors to help them navigate complex organizational and individual challenges. Consistent with current trends, a growing number of these mentor relationships will be initiated and carried out electronically, via e-mentoring. We build on existing social network research to investigate the role of e-mentoring in protégé outcomes. On a sample of graduate and undergraduate students, we examine the impact of dyad characteristics (e.g., interaction frequency, pre-existing relationship, perceived similarity, relevant mentor knowledge) on e-mentoring received as well as the impact of e-mentoring on protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Several dyad characteristics and e-mentoring functions received were positively associated with protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Limitations and implications for future research are offered.
AlaviM.GallupeR. B. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 139-153.
2.
AlaviM.LeidnerD. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12, 1-10.
3.
AlaviM.WheelerB. C.ValacichJ. S. (1995). Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative tele-learning. MIS Quarterly, 19, 293-312.
4.
AlaviM.YooY.VogelD. R. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1310-1333.
5.
AlgeB. J.WiethoffC.KleinH. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26-37.
6.
AllenT. D.EbyL. T.PoteetM. L.LentzE.LimaL. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127-136.
7.
AllenT. D.O’BrienK. E. (2006). Formal mentoring programs and organizational attraction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17, 43-58.
8.
AllenT. D.PoteetM. L.BurroughsS. M. (1997). The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 70-89.
9.
AllenT. D.RussellJ. E. A.MaetzkeS. B. (1997). Formal peer mentoring: Factors related to protégés’ satisfaction and willingness to mentor others. Group & Organization Studies, 22, 488-508.
10.
ArbaughJ. P. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32-54.
11.
ArbaughJ. P. (2005). Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 135-149.
12.
ArbaughJ. P.Benbunan-FichR. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 435-447.
13.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
BanduraA.CervoneD. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-113.
15.
BaughS. G.ScanduraT. A. (1999). The effects of multiple mentors on protégé attitudes toward the work setting. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 503-521.
16.
BerscheidE.SnyderM.OmotoA. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792-807.
17.
BirdiK.AllanC.WarrP. (1997). Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 845-857.
18.
BloomB. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
BurkeR. J.McKeenC. A.McKennaC. W. (1993). Correlates of mentoring in organizations: The mentor’s perspective. Psychological Reports, 72, 883-896.
20.
CarlsonJ. R.ZmudR. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-170.
21.
CarlsonR. E.WrightD. G. (1993). Computer anxiety and communication apprehension: Relationship and introductory college course effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 329-338.
22.
DayR.AllenT. D. (2002, April). Why are protégés more successful? Explaining the mentoring-career success relationship. Paper presented at the 17th Annual SIOP Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
23.
DeakinsD.GrahamL.SullivanR.WhittamG. (1998). New venture support: An analysis of mentoring support for new and early stage entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 5, 151-161.
24.
de JanaszS. C.EnsherE. A.HeunC. (2008). Using e-mentoring to connect business students with practicing managers: Virtual relationships and real benefits. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16, 394-411.
25.
de JanaszS. C.SullivanS. E.WhitingV. (2003). Mentor networks and career success: Lessons for turbulent times. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 78-93.
26.
DiRenzoM. S.LinnehanF.ShaoP.RosenbergW. L. (2010). A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 292-305.
27.
DobrowS. R.ChandlerD. E.MurphyW. M.KramK. E. (2012). A review of developmental networks: Incorporating a mutuality perspective. Journal of Management, 38, 210-242.
28.
EbyL. T.AllenT. D.HoffmanB. J.BaranikL. E.SauerJ. B.BaldwinS.. . .EvansS. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 441-476.
29.
EbyL. T.LockwoodA. (2005). Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 441-459.
30.
EnsherE. A.Grant-ValloneE. J.MarelichW. (2002). Effects of perceived attitudinal and demographic similarity on protégés support and satisfaction gained through their mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1407-1430.
31.
EnsherE. A.MurphyS. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 460-481.
32.
EnsherE. A.MurphyS. E. (2007). E-mentoring: Next-generation research and strategies. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 299-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
FletcherJ. K.RaginsB. R. (2007). Stone center relational cultural theory: A window on relational mentoring. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 373-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
FordJ. K.SmithE. M.WeissbeinD. A.GullyD.SalasE. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice training with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 218-233.
35.
ForretM. L.DoughertyT. W. (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management, 26, 283-311.
36.
FrancisL. (2007, July). Mentoring makeover: How the web is transforming the entire mentoring process. Training and Development, 61(7), 52-57.
37.
FullerR. M.VicianC.BrownS. A. (2006). E-learning and individual characteristics: The role of computer anxiety and communication apprehension. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 103-115.
38.
GaskillL. R. (1991). Same-sex and cross-sex mentoring of female protégés: A comparative analysis. Career Development Quarterly, 40, 48-63.
39.
GibsonD. E.CordovaD. I. (1999). Women and men’s role models: The importance of exemplars. In MurrellA. J.CrosbyF. J.ElyR. J. (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 121-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
GodshalkV. M. (2007). Social implications of e-mentoring: Why might e-mentoring work? In LiF. (Ed.), Social implications and challenges of e-business (pp. 31-45). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
41.
GodshalkV. M.SosikJ. J. (2000). Does mentor-protégé agreement on mentor leadership style influence the quality of mentoring relationships?Group & Organization Management, 25, 291-317.
42.
GodshalkV. M.SosikJ. J. (2003). Aiming for success: The role of learning goal orientation in mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 417-437.
43.
Grant-ValloneE. J.EnsherE. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction, and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 637-642.
44.
GremlerD. D.HoffmanK. D.KeaveneyS. M.WrightL. K. (2000). Experiential learning exercises in services marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 35-45.
45.
HamiltonB. A.ScanduraT. A. (2003). E-mentoring: Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 388-402.
46.
HezlettS. A. (2005). Protégés’ learning in mentoring relationships: A review of the literature and an exploratory case study. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 505-527.
47.
HigginsM. C. (2000). The more, the merrier? Multiple developmental relationships and work satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 19, 277-297.
48.
HigginsM. C.ChandlerD. E.KramK. E. (2007). Developmental initiation and developmental networks. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 349-372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
HigginsM. C.KramK. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264-288.
50.
HindeR. A. (1995). A suggested structure for a science of a relationship. Personnel Relationships, 2, 1-15.
KelleyH. H.BerscheidE.ChristensenA.HarveyJ. H.HustonT. L.LevingerG. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In KelleyH. H.. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20-67). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
53.
KnowlesM. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
54.
KobergC. S.BossR. W.GoodmanE. (1998). Factors and outcomes associated with mentoring among health-care professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 58-72.
55.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
56.
LankauM. J.ScanduraT. A. (2002). An investigation of personal learning in mentoring relationships: Content, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 779-790.
LinehanM.WalshJ. (1999). Mentoring relationships and the female managerial career. Career Development International, 4, 348-352.
59.
LyonsB. D.OpplerE. S. (2004). The effects of structural attributes and demographic characteristics on protégé satisfaction in mentoring programs. Journal of Career Development, 30, 215-230.
60.
MartinsL. L.GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
61.
McDowellE. (1998). An investigation of the relationships among technology experiences, communication apprehension, writing apprehension, and computer anxiety. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28, 345-355.
62.
MegginsonD. (1988). Instructor, coach, mentor: Three ways of helping for managers. Management Learning, 19, 33-46.
MooradianT.RenzlB.MatzlerK. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37, 523-540.
67.
OckerR. J.YaverbaumG. J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student, learning and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 427-440.
68.
OlianJ. D.CarrollS. J.GiannantonioC. M.FerenD. B. (1988). What do protégés look for in a mentor? Results of three experimental studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 15-37.
69.
OwensD. M. (2006, March). Virtual mentoring. HR Magazine, 51(3), 105-107.
70.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
71.
RaginsB. R.CottonJ. L.MillerJ. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177-1194.
72.
RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
RaginsB. R.McFarlinD. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 321-339.
74.
RheingoldH. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
75.
ScanduraT. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 169-174.
76.
SchunkD. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: MacMillan.
77.
SimmondsD.LupiA. M. Z. (2010). The matching process in e-mentoring: A case study in luxury hotels. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 300-316.
78.
SinghR.RaginsB. R.TharenouP. (2009). Who gets a mentor? A longitudinal assessment of the rising star hypothesis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 11-17.
79.
SingleP. B.MullerC. B. (2001). When e-mail and mentoring unite: The implementation of nationwide electronic mentoring program. In StromeiL. (Ed.), Implementing successful coaching and mentoring programs (pp. 107-122). Cambridge, MA: American Society for Training and Development.
80.
SingleP. B.SingleR. M. (2005). E-mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13, 301-320.
81.
SproullL.KieslerS. (1999). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 265, 116-123.
82.
TaechamaneestitT. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Attitude and learning proficiency of Thai undergraduate business students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of La Verne, La Verne, CA.
83.
ThibodeauxH. F.LoweR. H. (1996). Convergence of leader-member exchange and mentoring: An investigation of social influence patterns. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 97-114.
84.
TurbanD. B.DoughertyT. W.LeeF. K. (2002). Gender, race and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240-262.
85.
TurkleS. (1995). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
86.
van EmmerikI. J. H. (2004a). For better and for worse: Adverse working conditions and the beneficial effects of mentoring. Career Development International, 9, 358-374.
87.
van EmmerikI. J. H. (2004b). The more you can get the better: Mentoring constellations and intrinsic career success. Career Development International, 9, 578-594.
88.
WaltherJ. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
89.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
90.
WanbergC. R.WelshE. T.HezlettS. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 39-124.
91.
WatersL.McCabeM.KiellerupD.KiellerupS. (2002). The role of formal mentoring on business success and self-esteem in participants of a new business start-up program. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 107-121.
92.
WellmanB.GuliaM. (1999). Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual community as community. In WellmanB. (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-367). Boulder, CO: Westview.
93.
WhitingV. R.de JanaszS. C. (2004). Mentoring in the 21st century: Using the internet to build skills and networks. Journal of Management Education, 28, 275-293.
94.
YoungA. M.PerrewéP. L. (2000). What did you expect? An examination of career-related support and social support among mentors and protégés. Journal of Management, 26, 611-632.
