This study examined the influence of several factors on employees’ desire to provide upward feedback to their supervisors on an impending upward feedback system. Self-report data from 153 university employees indicated that the desire to provide upward feedback related negatively to fear of retaliation and positively to role appropriateness, perceived usefulness, rater self-efficacy, leader-member exchange, knowledge of upward feedback, top management support, coworker support, and feedback-seeking behavior. The authors also found that perceived usefulness mediated the relationships among fear of retaliation, leader-member exchange, top management support, coworker support, and knowledge of upward feedback with desire to provide upward feedback. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Antonioni, D., & Woehr, D. J. (2001). Improving the quality of multisource rater performance. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (pp. 114-129). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
4.
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 32, 370-398.
5.
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251-280.
6.
Atwater, L., & Waldman, D. (1998). Accountability in 360-degree feedback. HR Magazine, 43, 96-102.
7.
Atwater, L., Waldman, D., Atwater, D., & Cartier, P. (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology, 53, 275-297.
8.
Avis, J. M., & Kudisch, J. D. (2000, March). Factors influencing subordinates’ willingness to participate in upward feedback. Paper presented at the 21st annual Industrial & Organizational Behavior Graduate Conference, Knoxville, TN.
9.
Baron, R. E., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
10.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Church, A. H. (1995). First-rate multirater feedback. Training & Development, 49, 42-43.
12.
Church, A. H., & Bracken, D. W. (1997). Advancing the state of the art of 360-degree feedback: Guest editors’ comments on the research and practice of multirater assessment methods. Group & Organization Management, 22, 149-161.
13.
Church, A. H., Rogelberg, S. G., & Waclawski, J. (2000). Since when is no news good news? The relationship between performance and response rates in multirater feedback. Personnel Psychology, 53, 435-451.
14.
Church, A. H., & Waclawski, J. (1998). Making multirater feedback systems work. Quality Progress, 31, 81-89.
15.
Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 10, pp. 121-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
17.
Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. (1973). Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 10, 184-200.
18.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
19.
Decotiis, T., & Petit, A. (1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3, 635-646.
20.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
21.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
22.
Facteau, C. L. (1995). Managers’ behavioral responses to subordinate appraisal feedback: Predictors and outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
23.
Facteau, C. L., Facteau, J. D., Schoel, L. C., Russell, J. E., & Poteet, M. L. (1998). Reaction of leaders to 360-degree feedback from peers and subordinates. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 427-448.
24.
Facteau, J. D., Dobbins, G. H., Russell, J. E. A., Ladd, R. T., & Kudisch, J. D. (1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21, 1-25.
25.
Farnam, A. (1989). The trust gap. Fortune, 120(14), 56-78.
26.
Funderburg, S. A., & Levy, P. A. (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 22, 210-235.
27.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
28.
Graen, G. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
29.
Harris, M. M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737-756.
30.
Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32, 325-351.
31.
Hoffman, R. (1995). Ten reasons you should be using 360-degree feedback. HR Magazine, 40, 82-85.
32.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
33.
Jawahar, I. M. (2001). Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 875-883.
34.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). DOS LISREL 8.01. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
35.
Kenrick, D. T., & Braver, S. L. (1982). Personality: Idiographic and nomothetic! A rejoinder. Psychological Review, 89, 182-186.
36.
Kudisch, J. D. (1996). Factors related to participants’ acceptance of developmental assessment center feedback. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
37.
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
38.
Lehr, C. O., Poole, T. G., Curtis, L. B., & Russell, J. E. A. (1993, November). Multiple rater performance appraisal systems: An investigation of employee perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Management Association, Atlanta, GA.
39.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407-416.
40.
London, M., & Beatty, R. W. (1993). 360-degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 32, 353-372.
41.
London, M., & Smither, J. M. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-applications and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-838.
42.
Mazdar, S. (1995). Feedback seeking behavior: A review of the literature and implications for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6, 337-349.
43.
McEvoy, G. M., & Beatty, R. W. (1989). Assessment centers and subordinate appraisals of managers: A seven year examination of predictive validity. Personnel Psychology, 44, 375-390.
44.
McGarvey, R., & Smith, S. (1993). When workers rate the boss. Training, 30, 31-34.
45.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
46.
Mohrman, A. M., & Lawler, E. E. (1983). Motivation and performance appraisal behavior. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 173-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Mount, M. M. (1984). Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
48.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Napier, N., & Latham, G. (1996). Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827-837.
50.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organization research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
51.
Reilly, R. R., Smither, J. W., & Vasilopoulos, N. L. (1996). A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology, 49, 599-612.
52.
Rhodes, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organization support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
53.
Rogelberg, S. G., & Waclawski, J. (2001). Instrumentation design. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (pp. 79-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Rotolo, C. T., & Kudisch, J. D. (1996). Important considerations in developing and implementing a successful multi-source assessment system. International Personnel Management Association News, 14, 18-19.
55.
Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., Scandura, T. A., & Tepper, B. J. (1992). Development and preliminary validation of a new scale (LMX-6) to measure leader-member exchange in organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 135-147.
56.
Setton, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.
57.
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637-643.
58.
Smither, J. W., London, W., Vasilopoulos, N. L., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., & Salvemini, N. (1995). An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program over time. Personnel Psychology, 48, 1-34.
59.
Summers, L. (2001). Web technologies for administering multisource feedback programs. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (pp. 165-180). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Thibodeaux, H. F., Kudisch, J. D., & Fallon, J. D. (1998). Upward feedback at the University of Southern Mississippi: Discovery phase results (Tech. Rep.). Hattiesburg: University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Psychology.
61.
Tziner, A., & Murphy, K. R. (1999). Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 407-419.
62.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (2001). Relationships between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 226-241.
63.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (2002). Does conscientiousness moderate the relationship between attitudes and beliefs regarding performance appraisal and rating behavior?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 218-224.
64.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N., Beaudin, G., & Marchand, S. (1998). Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context on appraisal quality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 457-467.
65.
Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
66.
Waldman, D. A. (1997). Predictors of employee preferences for multirater and group-based performance appraisal. Group & Organization Management, 22, 264-287.
67.
Waldman, D. A., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of an upward feedback process. Group & Organization Management, 26, 189-205.
68.
Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-424.
69.
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
70.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.
71.
Westerman, J. W., & Rosse, J. G. (1997). Reducing the threat of rater nonparticipation in 360-degree feedback systems: An exploratory examination of antecedents to participation in upward ratings. Group & Organization Management, 22, 288-309.
72.
Wimer, S., & Nowack, K. M. (1998). 13 common mistakes using 360-degree feedback. Training & Development, 52, 69-78.
73.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (1995). How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback. Training, 50, 45-48.
