This study examined the extent to which personality predicts leaders’ reactions to multisource feedback and use of the feedback for development. Leaders (N = 116) in an elite unit of the U.S. military completed the Jackson Personality Inventory 6 months prior to multisource performance measurement. Self-report and psychologists’ ratings of reactions to feedback were collected immediately after feedback was provided (n = 95). Self-report ratings (n = 49) of development were collected 6 months later. Breadth of interest was positively related to viewing the feedback as valuable. Leaders high in emotional stability were more likely to be rated by a psychologist as motivated to use the feedback. Leaders high in responsibility felt obligated to use the feedback results. Six months later, leaders high in sociability were more likely to have sought additional feedback, and leaders high in responsibility were more likely to have engaged in developmental behaviors.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). The role of feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
2.
Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Helmes, E., & Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 243-250.
3.
Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A., & Brett, J. F. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multi-source feedback. Human Resource Management Journal, 41(2), 193-209.
4.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and performance: A meta-analyses. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance on sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
6.
Bell, S. T., & Arthur, W. (2002, April). Self-enhancement and self-verification in developmental assessment centers: Message and participant personality characteristics that influence feedback acceptance. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto.
7.
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 3600 feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930-942.
8.
Brinkmeyer, K. R. (1999). Feedback on feedback: How noncognitive individual differences impact the recipient’s view. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 60(3-B), 1335.
9.
Carpenter, J. C., & Freese, J. J. (1979). Three aspects of self-disclosure as they relate to quality of adjustment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 78-85.
10.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135.
12.
Clancy, T., & Gresham, J. (2001). Special forces: A guided tour of U.S. Army Special Forces. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
13.
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.
14.
Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10, 331-360.
15.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). NEO Personality Inventory Revised—manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16.
Dalessio, A. T. (1998). Using multi-source feedback for employee development and personnel decisions. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State-of-the-art in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
DeNisi, A., & Kluger, A. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129-139.
18.
Department of the Army. (1990). Military leadership. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Detwiler, F. R., & Ramanaiah, N. V. (1996). Structure of the Jackson Personality Inventory from the perspective of the five-factor model. Psychological Reports, 79, 411-416.
20.
Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
21.
Facteau, C. L., Facteau, J. D., Schoel, L. C., Russell, J. E. A., & Poteet, M. L. (1998) Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback from subordinates and peers. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 427-448.
22.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
23.
Goldberg L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
24.
Hogan, R., Hogan J., & Roberts B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
25.
Jackson, D. N. (1997). Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised: manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems, Inc.
26.
Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Fraboni, M., & Goffin, R. D. (1996). A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 33-45.
27.
Judge, T., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 693-710.
28.
Kaplan, R. (1993). 3600 feedback PLUS: Boosting the power of co-worker ratings for executives. Human Resource Management, 32(2/3), 299-314.
29.
Kay, E., & Meyer, H. H. (1965). Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 311-317.
30.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
31.
Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., & Lester, S. W. (1997). Beyond helping: Do other-oriented values have broader implications in organizations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 160-177.
32.
Leonard, E., & Williams, J. R. (2001, April). An empirical examination of accountability perceptions within a multi-source feedback system. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
33.
Lepsinger, R., & Lucia, A. (1998). Creating champions for 3600 feedback. Training and Development, 52(2), 49-53.
34.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
London, M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 119-153). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1999). Career-related continuous learning: Defining the construct and mapping the process. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in human resources management (Vol. 17, pp. 81-21). Stamford, CT: JAI.
37.
London, M., Smither, J. W., & Adsit, D. J. (1997). Accountability: The Achilles Heel of multi-source feedback. Group and Organization Management, 22, 162-184.
38.
Lord, R., & Hanges, P. (1987). A control system model of organizational motivation. Behavioral Science, 32, 161-178.
39.
Maurer, T. J., & Palmer, J. K. (1999). Management development intentions following feedback: Role of perceived outcomes, social pressures, and control. Journal of Management Development, 18(9), 733-751.
40.
McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 3600 feedback: Performance, improvement and employee career development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(1), 1-33.
41.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
42.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. American Psychologist, 44, 451-452.
43.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-216.
44.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the “Big Five” article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51, 849-857.
45.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
46.
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
47.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
48.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 45-67.
49.
Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., & Skov, R. (1982). Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 810-821.
50.
Roukema, K. A. (1997). Establishing the reliability and validity of a 360-degree feedback instrument for military leadership. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle Tennessee State University.
51.
Ryan, A. M., Brutus, S., Greguras, G. J., & Hakel, M. D. (2000). Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development. Journal of Management Development, 19(4), 252-276.
52.
Soeters, J. L. (2000). Culture in uniformed organizations (pp. 465-481). In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Stone, D. L., & Stone, E. F. (1985). The effects of feedback consistency and feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 167-185.
54.
Stone-Romero, E. F., & Anderson, L. E. (1994). Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 354-359.
55.
Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.
56.
Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 373-385.
