The authors integrate two complementary streams of research on “fit” that document positive impacts of similarity and negative effects of dissimilarity. Fit with an organization's culture typically focuses on similarity in values whereas relational demography examines similarity in demographic attributes. Although both streams emphasize fit and draw on similar underlying theories, little research investigates both simultaneously. In a field study with intact teams, both cultural and demographic fit had independent effects on subsequent performance; however, “deeper” value fit effects were stronger than “surface” demographic fit. Analyses by demographic group suggest that person-group fit has the greatest impact for individuals whose demographic background puts them at risk for poorer outcomes, particularly for socioeconomic status.
Adkins, B., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Firm or subgroup culture: Where does fitting in matter most?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 969-978.
2.
Adkins, C., Ravlin, E., & Meglino, B. (1996). Value congruence between co-workers and its relationship to work outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 21, 439-460.
3.
Adkins, C., Russell, C., & Werbel, J. (1994). Judgments of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47, 605-623.
4.
Aquino, K., Townsend, A., & Scott, K. (2001, August). The effects of surface and deep-level dissimilarity on individual work attitudes and cognitions in self-directed work teams. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management meeting, Washington, DC.
5.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
7.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.),Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
9.
Boisnier, A., & Chatman, J. (2003). The role of subcultures in agile organizations. In R. Peterson & E. Mannix (Eds.),Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization (pp. 87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Bretz, R., & Judge, T. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
11.
Bretz, R., Rynes, S., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 310-327.
12.
Burnett, J., Vaughan, M., & Moody, D. (1997). The importance of person-organization value congruence for female students joining college sororities. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 297-300.
13.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Byrne, D., Clore, G., & Worchel, P. (1966). The effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity as determinants of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 220-224.
15.
Cable, D., & Judge, T. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance, 67, 294-311.
16.
Cable, D., & Judge, T. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546-561.
17.
Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 648-657.
18.
Caplan, R. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248-267.
19.
Chatman, J. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333-349.
20.
Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
21.
Chatman, J., Caldwell, D., & O'Reilly, C. (1999). Managerial personality and performance: A semi-idiographic approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 514-545.
22.
Chatman, J., & Flynn, F. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956-974.
23.
Chatman, J., & O'Reilly, C. (2004). Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 193-208.
24.
Chatman, J., Polzer, J., Barsade, S., & Neale, M. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
25.
Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
26.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Diener, E., Larsen, R., & Emmons, R. (1984). Person × Situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 580-592.
28.
Edwards, J. R. (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46, 641-665.
29.
Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
30.
Finegan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149-169.
31.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Flynn, F., & Chatman, J. (2003). What's the norm here? Social categorization as a basis for norm development. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 5, 135-160.
33.
Flynn, F., Chatman, J., & Spataro, S. (2001). Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impression formation and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 414-442.
34.
Glavin, J., Jones, A., & Rozelle, R. (1996). The effects of coworker similarity on the emergence of affect in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 21, 192-215.
35.
Goldberg, C. (2005). Relational demography and similarity-attraction in interview assessments and subsequent offer decisions: Are we missing something?Group & Organization Management, 30, 597-624.
36.
Goodman, S., & Svyantek, D. (1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275.
37.
Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
38.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1046.
39.
Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification. London: Routledge.
40.
Jehn, K., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
41.
Judge, T., & Cable, D. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organizational attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359-394.
42.
Kirkman, B., Tesluk, P., & Rosen, B. (2004). The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader–team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 29, 334-368.
43.
Klein, K., Conn, A., Smith, B., & Sorra, J. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 3-16.
44.
Kristof, A. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
45.
Kristof-Brown, A. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643-671.
46.
Kristof-Brown, A., & Stevens, C. (2001). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1083-1095.
47.
Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
Lovelace, K., & Rosen, B. (1996). Differences in achieving person-organization fit among diverse groups of managers. Journal of Management, 22, 703-722.
49.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Martins, L., Milliken, F., Wiesenfeld, B., & Salgado, S. (2003). Racioethnic diversity and group members' experiences: The role of the racioethnic diversity of organizational context. Group & Organization Management, 28, 75-106.
51.
Mayo, M. (2000, August). Looking into the black box: A social network approach to diversity, communication, and work team effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
52.
Mayo, M., Pastor, J., & Meindl, J. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 265-284.
53.
McCulloch, M. (2001, April). Using person-organization fit to predict job departure in call centers. Paper presented at the 16th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
54.
Meglino, B., & Ravlin, E. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
55.
Meglino, B., Ravlin, E., & Adkins, C. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424-432.
56.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 441-452.
57.
Milliken, F., & Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
58.
Mueller, C., Finley, A., Iverson, R., & Price, J. (1999). The effects of racial composition on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career commitment. Work and Occupations, 26, 187-219.
59.
O'Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
60.
O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 157-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
61.
O'Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
62.
Ostroff, C., & Rothausen, T. (1997). The moderating effect of tenure in person-environment fit: A field study of educational organizations. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70, 173-188.
63.
Pelled, L., Eisenhardt, K., & Xin, K. (1999). Demographic diversity in work groups: An empirical assessment of linkages to intragroup conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
64.
Pelled, L., Xin, K., & Weiss, A. (2004). No es como mi: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 63-84.
65.
Pervin, L. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 14, 350-360.
66.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 299-357). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
67.
Phinney, J. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean?American Psychologist, 51, 918-927.
68.
Polzer, J., Milton, L., & Swann, W. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.
69.
Powell, G. (1998, Winter). Reinforcing and extending today's organizations: The simultaneous pursuit of person-organization fit and diversity. Organizational Dynamics, pp. 50-61.
70.
Randel, A. (2000, August). How do members of groups diverse on multiple dimensions conceptualize one another? Social contextual triggers and work group conflict implications of identity salience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
71.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367-386.
72.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Balkwell, J. W. (1997). Group processes and the diffusion of status-value beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 14-31.
73.
Riordan, C. (2001). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 19, 131-174.
74.
Riordan, C., & Shore, L. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342-358.
75.
Rodriguez, R. (2000). Challenging demographic reductionism: An investigation of demographic diversity and value diversity in small groups. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3621B-3621B.
76.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
77.
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In B. Schneider (Ed.),Organizational climate and culture (pp. 153-192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78.
Saks, A., & Ashforth, B. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395-426.
79.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
80.
Schneider, B., Kristof-Brown, A., Goldstein, H., & Smith, D. (1997). What is this thing called fit? In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.),International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 393-412). New York: John Wiley.
81.
Sheridan, J. (1992). Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1036-1056.
82.
Smith, K., Smith, K., Olian, J., Sims, H., O'Bannon, D. & Scull, J. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412-438.
83.
Sorensen, J. (2000). The longitudinal effects of group tenure composition on turnover. American Sociological Review, 65, 298-310.
84.
Spataro, S. (2002). Not all differences are the same: The role of informal status in predicting reactions to demographic diversity in organizations (Working Paper No. OB-03). New Haven, CT: Yale University, School of Management.
85.
Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207-218.
86.
Tsui, A., Egan, T., & O'Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
87.
Tsui, A., & O'Reilly, C. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
88.
Turban, D., Dougherty, T., & Lee, F. (1999, August). The impact of demographic diversity and perceived similarity on mentoring outcomes: The moderating effect of time. Paper presented at the national meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
89.
Vancouver, J., & Schmitt, N. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333-352.
90.
Vandenberghe, C. (1999). Organizational culture, person-culture fit, and turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 175-184.
91.
Van Vianen, A. (2000). Person-organization fit: The match between newcomers' and recruiters' preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 5, 113-147.
92.
Vecchio, R., & Bullis, R. (2001). Moderators of the influence of supervisor-subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 884-896.
93.
Verquer, M., Beehr, T., & Wagner, S. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit research and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473-489.
94.
Wagner, W., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.
95.
Webster, M., & Hysom, S. J. (1998). Creating status characteristics. American Sociological Review, 63, 351-379.
96.
Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
97.
Zammuto, R., & Krakower, J. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative studies of organizational culture. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 83-114.
98.
Zatzick, C., Elvira, M., & Cohen, L. (2003). When is more better? The effects of racial composition on voluntary turnover. Organization Science, 14, 483-496.
