In contrast with more traditional command and control organizations, recent years have witnessed a trend toward more participative managerial structures, where direct supervision is de-emphasized and front-line workers plan and think for themselves. As suggested by the person-organization fit literature, research is needed which identifies individuals whose characteristics represent a good match with alternative manager-subordinate relationship structures. This study investigates whether differences in personality are systematically associated with preferences for first-line management jobs requiring alternative supervisory approaches. Using participants drawn from New Zealand and the United States (n = 200), results generally indicate that individuals who prefer more participative managerial styles also exhibit higher levels of agreeableness and openness to experience. Two components of extraversion (sociability and ambition), display significant and opposing relationships with preferences for more participative styles of management. While individuals preferring more participative styles of management exhibit higher levels of sociability, they also exhibit lower levels of ambition.
Barber A.E. , B.L. Rau and M.J. Simmering. 1996 (August). Compensation policies as signals in organizational recruitment. In Organizational issues in compensation. J.J. Martocchio (Chair). Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, Ohio.
2.
Barrick M.R. and M.K. Mount. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology44: 1-26.
3.
Bowen, D.E. , G.E. Ledford Jr and B.R. Nathan. 1991. Hiring for the organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive5(4): 35-51.
4.
Boyett, J.H. and H.P. Conn. 1991. Workplace 2000: The Revolution Reshaping American Business. New York: Plume.
5.
Bretz, R.D. , R.A. Ash and G.F. Dreher. 1989. Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology42: 561-581.
6.
Bretz, R.D. and TA. Judge. 1994. Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior44: 32-54.
7.
Burke, R.J. and E. Deszca. 1982. Preferred organizational climates of Type A individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior21: 50-59.
8.
Burns, T. and G.M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
9.
Chatman, J.A.1989. Improving organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review14: 333-349.
10.
Chatman, J.1991. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly36: 459-484.
11.
Coate, C.J. and J.P. Guthrie. 1999. A re-examination of the accounting stereotype. In Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research. Vol. 2, ed. J.E. Hunton, 153-171. Stamford, Conn.: JAI Press.
12.
Cohen, J.1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Costa, P.T. Jr and R.R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment. Resources, Inc.
14.
Digman J.M.1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology41: 417-440.
15.
Fisher, K.1993. Leading Self-Directed Work Teams: A Guide to Developing New Team Leadership Skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Guion, R.M. and R.E Gottier. 1965. Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology18: 135-164.
17.
Hofstede, G.1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hogan, R.T. and J. Hogan. 1995. Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. 2nd edn.Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
19.
Judge, T.A. and J.E. Bono. 2000. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology85: 751-765.
20.
Judge, T.A. and D.M. Cable. 1997. Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology50: 359-394.
21.
Kashima, Y. and VJ. Callan. 1994. The Japanese work group. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 4, 2nd edn, eds H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough, 609-646. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press.
22.
Kristof, A.L.1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology49: 1-50.
23.
Kruglanski, R.W.1975. The human subject in the psychology experiment: Fact and artifact. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 8, ed. L. Berkowitz, 101-147. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Lawler, E.E. III.1992. The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Likert, R.1961. New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Likert, R.1967. The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. New York: McGraw- Hill.
27.
Morgan, R.B. and J.E. Smith. 1996. Staffing the New Workplace: Selecting and Promoting for Quality Improvement. Milwaukee. WI: ASQC Quality Press.
28.
Mount, M.K. and M.R. Barrick. 1995. The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 13, ed. G.R. Ferris, 153-200. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
29.
Myers, R.1990. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. 2nd edn.Boston: Duxbury Press.
30.
O'Reilly, C.A. III , J. Chatman and D.E Caldwell. 1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal34: 487-516.
31.
Pfeffer, J.1998. The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
Podsakoff, P.M. and D.W. Organ. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12: 531-544.
33.
Sackett, P.R. and J.R. Larson Jr.1990. Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 1, 2nd edn, eds M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough, 419-489. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stevens, C.D. and R.A. Ash. 2001. Selecting employees for fit: Personality and preferred managerial style. Journal of Managerial Issues13: 500-517.
36.
Taylor, F.W.1947. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Vandenberghe, C.1999. Organizational culture, person-organization fit, and turnover: a replication in the health care industry. Journal of Organizational Behavior20: 175-184.
38.
Van Vianen, A.E.M.2000. Person-organization fit: The match between newcomers' and recruiters' preferences for organizational culture. Personnel Psychology53: 113-149.
39.
Yukl, G. and D.D. Van Fleet. 1992. Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 3, 2nd edn, eds M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough, 147-197. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
