Are Organizational Justice Effects Bounded by Individual Differences? An Examination of Equity Sensitivity,Exchange Ideology,and the Big Five

Abstract

This study explored the extent to which two theoretically derived individual differences (equity sensitivity and exchange ideology) moderated the effects of injustice on behavioral reactions. Participants (N = 707) completed hypothetical vignettes that manipulated distributive, procedural, and interpersonal justice and assessed potential reactions in terms of task performance, citizenship, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior. Results showed that exchange ideology, but not equity sensitivity, emerged as a significant moderator of several justice-outcome relationships. In addition, a usefulness analysis comparing the moderating potential of the more narrow equity sensitivity and exchange ideology variables to the broader Big Five revealed that the two narrow variables were more impactful moderators than were the Big Five, though these differences were because of the effects of exchange ideology.

Keywords

justice personality equity social exchange

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press .

Bies, R.J. , & Moag, J.F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki , B. H. Sheppard , & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT : JAI .

Bing, M.N. , & Burroughs, S.M. (2001). The predictive and interactive effects of equity sensitivity in teamwork-oriented organizations . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 271-290 .

Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley .

Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure . Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 386-400 .

Colquitt, J.A. , Conlon, D.E. , Wesson, M.J. , Porter, C. , & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research . Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445 .

Colquitt, J.A. , & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

Colquitt, J.A. , Greenberg, J. , & Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), The handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

Colquitt, J.A. , Scott, B.A. , Judge, T.A. , & Shaw, J.C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99.

10.

Cronbach, L.J. , & Gleser, G.C. (1965). The bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. In Psychological tests and personnel decisions (pp. 97-107). Urbana : University of Illinois Press .

11.

Cropanzano, R. , Rupp, D.E. , Mohler, C.J. , & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice . Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 1-113 .

12.

Eisenberger, R. , Cotterell, N. , & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 743-750 .

13.

Eisenberger, R. , Huntington, R. , Hutchison, S. , & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support . Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507 .

14.

Elovainio, M. , Kivimaki, M. , Vahtera, J. , Virtanen, M. , & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2003). Personality as a moderator in the relations between perceptions of organizational justice and sickness absence . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 379-395 .

15.

Foa, E.B. , & Foa, U.G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange . In K. J. Gergen , M. S. Greenberg , & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York: Plenum .

16.

Foa, U.G. , & Foa, E.B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

17.

Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229 .

18.

Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178 .

19.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts . Journal of Applied Psychology , 75, 561-568 .

20.

Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .

21.

Greenberg, J. , & Eskew, D. (1993). The role of role playing in organizational research . Journal of Management, 2, 221-241 .

22.

Hatfield, E. , & Sprecher, S. (1983). Equity theory and recipient reactions to aid. In J. D. Fisher , A. Nadler , & B. M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol. 1, pp. 113-141). New York: Academic Press .

23.

Hogan, J. , & Roberts, B. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637 .

24.

Homans, G. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .

25.

Hulin, C.L. (1991). Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations . In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 445-506). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press .

26.

Huseman, R.C. , Hatfield, J.D. , & Miles, E.W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct . Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234 .

27.

Kickul, J. , & Lester, S.W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior . Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 191-217 .

28.

King, W.C. , & Miles, E.W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133-142 .

29.

King, W.C. , Miles, E.W. , & Day, D.D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317 .

30.

Lee, C. , & Farh, J.-H. (1999). The effects of gender in organizational justice perception . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 133-143 .

31.

Lee, K. , & Allen, N.J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions . Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131-142 .

32.

Lehman, W.E.K. , & Simpson, D.D. (1992). Employee substance abuse and on-the-job behaviors . Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 309-321 .

33.

Leventhal, G.S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press .

34.

Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen , M. Greenberg , & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum .

35.

Miles, E.W. , Hatfield, J.D. , & Huseman, R.C. (1989). The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications for worker performance . Journal of Management, 15, 581-588 .

36.

Miles, E.W. , Hatfield, J.D. , & Huseman, R.C. (1994). Equity sensitivity and outcome importance . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 585-596 .

37.

O'Neill, B.S. , & Mone, M.A. (1998). Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes . Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 805-816 .

38.

Ones, D.S. , & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626 .

39.

Organ, D.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI .

40.

Reed, T.F. , & Kelly, D. (1993). An exchange theory of organizational citizenship . Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 11, 41-82 .

41.

Robinson, S.L. , & O' Leary-Kelly, A.M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees . Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658-672 .

42.

Sackett, P.R. , & DeVore, C.J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson , D. S. Ones , H. K. Sinangil , & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145-151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

43.

Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers . Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516 .

44.

Schmitt, N. , & Stults, D.M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement , 9, 367-373 .

45.

Schneider, R.J. , Hough, L.M. , & Dunnette, M.D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655 .

46.

Skarlicki, D.P. , Folger, R. , & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator of the relationship between fairness and retaliation . Academy of Management Journal , 42, 100-108 .

47.

Skarlicki, D.P. , & Latham, G.P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory . Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161-169 .

48.

Smith, D.B. , & Ellingson, J.E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts . Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211-219 .

49.

Sternberg, R.J. (1987). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, and commitment . New York. Basic Books .

50.

Sweeney, P.D. , & McFarlin, D.B. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the “ends” and “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40 .

51.

Sweeney, P.D. , & McFarlin, D.B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98 .

52.

Tepper, B.J. , & Taylor, E.C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors' and subordinates' procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors . Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97-105 .

53.

Thibaut, J. , & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

54.

Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York : Guilford .

55.

Williams, L.J. , & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors . Journal of Management, 17, 601-617 .

56.

Witt, L.A. (1992). Exchange ideology as a moderators of the relationships between importance of participation in decision making and job attitudes . Human Relations, 45, 73-85 .

57.

Witt, L.A. , & Broach, D. (1993). Exchange ideology as a moderator of the procedural justice-satisfaction relationship . Journal of Social Psychology , 133, 97-103 .

58.

Witt, L.A. , Kacmar, M. , & Andrews, M. (2001). The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor-rated commitment . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 505-515 .