A firm often has multiple sourcing options for its product. Some suppliers may have longer lead times but offer lower prices, whereas reliable suppliers with quick-response capabilities may have higher prices. Purchasing from a cheaper, less reliable supplier can help a firm lower its inventory cost but will expose itself to potential risks. This paper analyzes a supply chain in which a manufacturer can source from a cheaper, less reliable supplier with a long lead time and/or a reliable quick-response supplier. The manufacturer also has to make demand-generating marketing investments before the selling season. Our analysis shows that if the unreliable supplier’s reliability is low, the reliable supplier will charge a low wholesale price; otherwise, it will choose a high wholesale price. As the unreliable supplier’s reliability improves, the manufacturer is inclined to increase its marketing investment, but there is a drop at some critical threshold. Interestingly, the existence of an unreliable supplier can lead to a win–win outcome for the reliable supplier and the manufacturer. The unreliable supplier’s reliability has nonmonotonic effects on the equilibrium profits of the reliable supplier and the manufacturer.
BabichVBurnetasANRitchkenPH (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management9(2): 123–146.
5.
BagwellK (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. In: Armstrong M and Porter R (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1701–1844.
6.
BarRNHavivA (2023) Brand building to deter entry and its impact on brand value. Management Science69(9): 5418–5438.
7.
BarrosoALlobetG (2012) Advertising and consumer awareness of new, differentiated products. Journal of Marketing Research49(6): 773–792.
8.
BouteRNDisneySMGijsbrechtsJ, et al. (2022) Dual sourcing and smoothing under nonstationary demand time series: Reshoring with speedFactories. Management Science68(2): 1039–1057.
CalvoEMartínez-de-AlbénizV (2016) Sourcing strategies and supplier incentives for short-life-cycle goods. Management Science62(2): 436–455.
11.
ChodJTrichakisNTsoukalasG (2019) Supplier diversification under buyer risk. Management Science65(7): 3150–3173.
12.
CooksonJA (2018) Anticipated entry and entry deterrence: Evidence from American casino industry. Management Science64(5): 2325–2344.
13.
CuiYHuMLiuJ (2023) Value and design of traceability-driven blockchains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management25(3): 1099–1116.
14.
DadaMPetruzziNCSchLewarzLB (2007) A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management9(1): 9–32.
15.
DanaherPJ (2023) Optimal microtargeting of advertising. Journal of Marketing Research60(3): 564–584.
16.
DemirelSKapuscinskiRYuM (2018) Strategic behavior of suppliers in the face of production disruptions. Management Science64(2): 533–551.
17.
DeoSCorbettCJ (2009) Cournot competition under yield uncertainty: The case of the US influenza vaccine market. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management11(4): 563–576.
18.
DongLGengXXiaoG, et al. (2022) Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers under correlated random yields. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(1): 179–195.
19.
FedergruenAYangN (2009) Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Operations Research57(6): 1451–1468.
20.
FengQJiaJShanthikumarJG (2019) Dynamic multisourcing with dependent supplies. Management Science65(6): 2770–2786.
GuoXJiangB (2023) Inventory sharing under service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management25(6): 2333–2351.
25.
HarutyunyanMJiangB (2019) The bright side of having an enemy. Journal of Marketing Research56(4): 679–690.
26.
HuangX (2022) Financing disruptive suppliers: Payment advance, timeline, and discount rate. Production and Operations Management31(3): 1115–1134.
27.
HuangXBoyacıTGümüşMRaySZhangD (2015) United we stand or divided we stand? strategic supplier alliances under order default risk. Management Science62(5): 1297–1315.
JainNGirotraKNetessineS (2022) Recovering global supply chains from sourcing interruptions: The role of sourcing strategy. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(2): 846–863.
30.
JapSDGanesanS (2000) Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research37(2): 227–245.
31.
JungSHKouvelisP (2022) On co-opetitive supply partnerships with end-product rivals: Information asymmetry, dual sourcing and supply market efficiency. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(2): 1040–1055.
KrishnanHKapuscinskiRButzDA (2010) Quick response and manufacturer effort. Management Science56(6): 962–977.
34.
LeesNJNuthallP (2015) Case study analysis on supplier commitment to added value agri-food supply chains in New Zealand. Agricultural and Food Economics3: 1–16.
35.
LiuSSoKCZhangF (2010) Effect of supply reliability in a retail setting with joint marketing and inventory decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management12(1): 19–32.
MilgromPRobertsJ (1982) Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory27(2): 280–312.
40.
NiuBLiJZhangJ, et al. (2019) Strategic analysis of dual sourcing and dual channel with an unreliable alternative supplier. Production and Operations Management28(3): 570–587.
41.
QianY (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics123(4): 1577–1609.
SunJDeboLGKekreS, et al. (2010) Component-based technology transfer in the presence of potential imitators. Management Science56(3): 536–552.
52.
SwinneyRNetessineS (2009) Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management11(1): 109–127.
53.
TangSYKouvelisP (2011) Supplier diversification strategies in the presence of yield uncertainty and buyer competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management13(4): 439–451.
54.
TiroleJ (1989) The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
TomlinB (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science52(5): 639–657.
56.
WangYGillandWTomlinB (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement?Manufacturing & Service Operations Management12(3): 489–510.
57.
WangYWebsterS (2022) Product flexibility strategy under supply and demand risk. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(3): 1779–1795.
XuYSerelDABisiA, et al. (2022) Coping with demand uncertainty: The interplay between dual sourcing and endogenous partial backordering. Production and Operations Management31(4): 1560–1575.
61.
YangZAydinGBabichV, et al. (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: Competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management14(2): 202–217.
62.
YangZBabichV (2014) Does a procurement service provider generate value for the buyer through information about supply risks?Management Science61(5): 979–998.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
