We build on the national culture, complex adaptive systems, and operations complexity literature to develop hypotheses about the moderating role of national culture on the negative relationship between dynamic operations culture and operational complexity. Monthly performance data were collected from 179 plants in a multinational corporation's global plant network that spans all national culture clusters. We use random effects time series modeling to incorporate the transitory nature of this relationship and control unobserved heterogeneity over time. The results indicate that the relationship between dynamic operations complexity and operational performance is moderated by every dimension of national culture except gender egalitarianism and institutional collectivism. We contribute to the literature on complexity by introducing the dynamic operations complexity construct and showing the moderating effect of national culture. We contribute to the national culture literature by comprehensively examining the role of national culture supporting the national culture divergence thesis. Managerial implications relate to locating new plants in regions whose national culture is supportive of key goals and allocating tasks and products accordingly.
AshkanasyNGuptaVMayfieldMS, et al. (2004) Future orientation. In: HouseRHangesPJavidanMDorfmanPGuptaV (eds) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
BaltagiBH (2021) Econometric analysis of panel data. In: Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 6th ed. Chichester: Springer. 978-3-030-53953-5.
3.
BockstedtJDruehlCMishraA (2015) Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of. Journal of Operations Management36(2015): 187–200.
4.
BortolottiTBoscariSDaneseP (2015) Successful lean implementation. International Journal of Production Economics160: 182–201.
5.
BoscariSBortolottiTNetlandT, et al. (2018) National culture and operations management: A structured literature review. International Journal of. Production Research56(18): 6314–6331.
6.
CameronSQuinnRE (2011) Designing and Changing Organizational Culture Based on the Competing Values Framework, 3rd ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
CampbellDJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review13(1): 40–52.
8.
CampbellDJGingrichK (1986) The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: A field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes38: 162–180.
9.
ChangWEllingerAEKimK, et al. (2016) Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta-analyss of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors. European Management Journal34: 282–295.
10.
ChildJKieserA (1979) Organizational and managerial roles in British and West German companies: an examination of the culture-free thesis. In: LammersCJHicksonDJ (eds) Organizations Alike and Unlike: International and Institutional Studies in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 271. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
11.
ChipuluMOjiakoUGardinerP, et al. (2014) Exploring the impact of cultural values on project performance: The effects of cultural values, age, and gender on the perceived importance of project success/failure factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management34(3): 364–389.
12.
ChoiTYDooleyKJRungtusanathamM (2001) Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management19: 351–366.
13.
ChoiTYKevinJDManus R (2001) Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence. Journal of operations management19(3): 351–366.
14.
ChungJMooreGS (2001) A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting13: 111–125.
15.
CostaFLispiLPortioliS, et al. (2019) How to foster sustainable continuous improvement: A cause-effect relations map of lean and practices. Operations Research Perspectives6: 100091.
16.
DeanJWSnellSA (1991) Integrated manufacturing and job design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Management Journal34(4): 776–804.
17.
De LuqueMJavidanM (2004) Uncertainty avoidance. In: HouseRHangesPJavidanMDorfmanPGuptaV (eds) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
Den HartogD (2004) Assertiveness. In: HouseRJHangesPJJavidanMDorfmanPWGuptaV (eds) Cultures, Leadership and Organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2004.
19.
DiamontidisADChatzogluP (2019) Factors affecting employee performance: An empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management68(1): 171–193.
20.
Diaz-GarciaCGonzalez-MorenoASaez-MartinezFJ (2013) Gender diversity within research and development teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice15(2): 149–160.
GelfandMJBhawukDPSNishiiLH, et al. (2004) Individualism and collectivism. In: HouseRJHangesPJJavidanMDorfmanPWGuptaV (eds) Cultures, Leadership and Organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2004.
26.
GelfandMJErezMAycanZ (2007) Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology58: 479–514.
27.
GoldsteinJ (1994) The Unshackled Organization. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
28.
GrayJVMassiminoB (2014) The effect of language differences and national culture on operational process compliance. Production and Operations Management23(6): 1042–1056.
29.
GreiderW (1997) One World, Ready or Not: the Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.
30.
GuptaMGuptaS (2019) Influence of national cultures on operations management and supply chain management practices – A research agenda. Production and Operations Management28(11): 2681–2698.
31.
GuptaVHangesJDorfmanP (2002) Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings. Journal of World Business37: 11–15.
32.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management1(1): 11–17.
34.
HouseRHangesPJavidanM, et al. (2004) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
HouseRJHangesPJ (2004) Research design. In: HouseRHangesPJavidanMDorfmanPGuptaV (eds) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
HouseRJJavidanMHangesP, et al. (2002) Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business37: 3–10.
37.
HsuICLawlerJJ (2019) An investigation of the relationship between gender composition organizational performance in Taiwan – the role of task complexity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management36(1): 275–304.
38.
JacobsMASwinkM (2011) Product portfolio architectural complexity and operational performance: Incorporating the roles of learning and fixed assets. Journal of Operations Management29(7–8): 677.
39.
JavidanM (2004) Performance orientation. In: HouseRJHangesPJJavidanMDorfmanPWGuptaV (eds) Cultures, Leadership and Organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2004.
40.
JavidanMHouseRJ (2001) Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics29(4): 289–305.
41.
JiangUColakogluSLepakDR, et al. (2015) Involvement work systems and operational effectiveness: Exploring the moderating effect of national power distance. Journal of International Business46: 332–354.
42.
KaasaAMinkov (2020) Are the world’s national culture becoming more similar. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology52(7–8): 531–550.
43.
KathuriaRPartoviFY (1999) Workforce management practices for manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management18: 21–39.
44.
KetokiviMBromilyPAwayshehA (2021) Making theoretically informed choices in specifying panel-data models. Production and Operations Management30(7): 20. 69-2076.
45.
KetokiviMSchroederRG (2004) Strategic, structural contingency and institutional explanations in the adoption of innovative manufacturing practices. Journal of Operations Management22: 63–89.
46.
KhuranaA (1999) Managing complex production processes. Sloan Management Review40(2): 85–97.
47.
KuhnMSchaeferFOttenH (2018) Process complexity as a future challenge – a quality management perspective. The TQM Journal30(6): 701–716.
48.
KullTJWackerJG (2010) Quality management effectiveness in Asia. Journal of Operations Management28(3): 223–239.
49.
KullTJYanTLiuZ, et al. (2014) The moderation of lean manufacturing effectiveness by dimensions of national culture: Testing practice-culture congruence hypotheses. Journal of International Economics153: 1–12.
50.
LaohavichianTFredendallLDCantrellRS (2011) Leadership and quality management practices in Thailand. International Journal of Operations & Production Management31(10): 1048–1070.
51.
LeSTQHuynhVN (2023) An evaluation model for task complexity in production lines. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management72(10): 3162–3183.
52.
LeszczenskyLWolbringT (2019) How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociological Methods & Research51: 837–865.
53.
LeungKBhagatRSBeucharNR, et al. (2005) Culture and internal business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies36(4): 357–378.
54.
LevineDIToffelMW (2010) Quality management and job quality: How the ISO 901 standard for quality management systems affects employees and employers. Management Science56: 978–996.
55.
LewinR (1994) Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. New York: MacMillan.
56.
LiuHKeWWeiKK, et al. (2013) Effects of supply chain integration and market orientation on firm performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management33(3): 322–346.
57.
McSweeneyB (2002) Hofstede’s models of national culture differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Resources55(1): 89–118.
58.
MettersR (2008) A case of national culture and offshoring services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management28(8): 727–747.
MinSMentzerJTLadaRT (2007) A market orientation in supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science35(4): 507–522.
61.
MuellerVRosenbuschNBauschA (2013) Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation: A meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management39(6): 1606–1636.
62.
NaorMLindermanKSchroederR (2010) The globalization of operations in Eastern and Western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management28: 194–205.
63.
NewburryWYakovaN (2005) Standardization preference: A function of national culture, work interdependence and local embeddedness. Journal of International Business Studies37: 44–60.
64.
NovakSEppingerSD (2001) Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management science47(1): 189–204.
65.
OrlitskyMBenjaminJD (2003) The effect of sex composition on small-group performance in a business school case competition. Academy of Management Learning & Education2(2): 128–138.
66.
PagellMKatzJSheuC (2005) The importance of national culture and operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management25(3): 371–394.
67.
ParkCLPaivaEL (2018) How do national cultures impact the operations strategy process?International Journal of Operations & Production Management38(10): 1937–1963.
68.
PooleNSVan de VenAH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review14(4): 562–578.
69.
PowerDKlassenRKullT, et al. (2015) Competitive goals and plant investment in environmental and safety practices: Moderating effect of national culture. Decision Sciences46(1): 63–100.
70.
PowerDSchoenherrTSamsonD (2010) The cultural characteristics of individualism/collectivism: A comparative study of implications for investment in operations between emerging Asian and industrializing Western countries. Journal of Operations Management28: 206–222.
71.
QuinnREKimberlyJR (1984) Paradox, planning and perseverance: Guidelines for managerial practice. In: KimberlyJRQuinnRE (eds) New Futures: The Challenge of Managing Corporate Transitions. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 295–313.
72.
RalstonDAHoltDHTerpstraRH, et al. (1995) The impact of culture and ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan and China. Academy of Management Journal: 187–191.
73.
RonenSShenkarO (1985) Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review10(3): 435–454.
74.
RonenSShenkarO (2013) Mapping world clusters: Cluster formation, sources and implications. Journal of International Business Studies44: 867–897.
75.
RugmanACollinsonS (2005) Multinational enterprises in the new Europe: Are they really global?Organizational Dynamics34(3): 258–272.
76.
RungtusanathamMForzaCKakaBR, et al. (2005) TAM Across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments. Journal of Operations Management23: 43–63.
77.
SarafanMSquireBBrandon-JonesE (2020) The effect of cultural value orientations on responses to supply-side disruption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management40(100): 1723–1747.
78.
ScheinE (1997) Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79.
ScheinEH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80.
SchroderHDriverMStreufertS (1967) Human Information Processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
81.
ShaneS (1993) Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing8: 59–73.
82.
SharmaSRichardMDOdedG-A (1981) Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of marketing research18(3): 291–300.
83.
SkinnerW (1974) The focused plant. Harvard Business Review.113–121. May-June.
84.
SmithPB (2006) When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: The GLOBE and Hofstede projects. Journal of International Business Studies37: 915–921.
85.
SnowdenDFBooneME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review85(11): 68–76.
86.
StamatisDH (2010) The OEE Primer: Understanding Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Reliability, and Maintainability. New York: Productivity Press.
87.
SteinmanD (1976) The effects of cognitive feedback and task complexit in multiple-cur probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes15: 168–179.
88.
StoermerSBaderAFroeseF (2016) Culture matters: The influence of national culture on inclusive climate. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management23(2): 287–305.
89.
SunarNSwaminathanJM (2022) Socially relevant and inclusive operations management. Production and Operations Management31: 4379–4392.
90.
TriandisHC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing social contexts. Psychological Review96: 506–520.
91.
TrompenaarsFHampden-TurnerC (1998) Riding the Waves of Culture. NY: McGraw-Hill.
92.
VecchiABrennanL (2011) Quality management: A cross-cultural perspective based on the GLOBE framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management31(5): 527–553.
93.
VickerySKKoufterosXDrogeC, et al. (2015) Product modularity, process modularity and new product introduction performance: Does complexity matter?Production and Operations Management25(4): 751–770.
94.
WiengartenFFynesBPagellM, et al. (2011) Exploring the impact of national culture on investments in manufacturing practices and performance: An empirical multi-country study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management31(5): 554–578.
95.
WilliamsKO’ReillyC (1998) Forty years of diversity research: A review. In: StawBNCummingsLL (eds) Res. in Org. Beh. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 77–140.
96.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel dataMIT press.
97.
YouFKullTJ (2015) Supplier opportunism in buyer-supplier NPD: A China-U.S. Study of antecedents, consequences, and cultural/institutional contexts. Decision Sciences46(2): 403–445.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
