Despite the considerable amount of literature on self-reported corruption and the salience of anti-corruption narratives among international organizations, little is known about bribe payers’ reporting decisions. Relying on the analysis of a self-report survey among a specific subsample of the victimized population—the university students who were forced to pay a bribe in their interaction with state agencies after extortion in Azerbaijan (n = 152), this paper attempts to ascertain whether the previously employed crime seriousness construct is relevant in the context of bribery. Results suggest that only 25.7% of bribe payments have been reported to the authorities. As the first study exploring the role of crime seriousness in the context of bribery reporting, we found that neither financial impact nor emotional distress caused by a bribe payment affects reporting behavior. Instead, previous contact with the criminal justice system was the sole predictor of decision-making, indicating for the first time in the literature the applicability of the contact thesis in the context of corruption. The study contributes to victimology as it provides insights into the correlates of decision-making among victims of bribery requests and tests the applicability of crime seriousness in a previously unstudied offence.
AgerbergM. (2021). Messaging about corruption: The power of social norms. Governance, 35(3), 929–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12633
3.
AllisonP. (1999) Multiple Regression: A Primer.Pine Forge Press.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
5.
AminiA.DouarinE.HinksT. (2022). Individualism and attitudes towards reporting corruption: Evidence from post-communist economies. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000648
6.
AndersonC. J.TverdovaY. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.
7.
AsomahJ. Y.DimE. E.LiY. (2023). Are women less corrupt than men? Evidence from Ghana. Crime Law and Social Change, 79(5), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10034-1
8.
AustinC. P.SteyerbergE. W. (2015). The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014
9.
AvivG. (2014). Crime victims and attitudes towards the police: The Israeli case. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 15(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.874170
10.
AzfarO.MurrellP. (2009). Identifying reticent respondents: Assessing the quality of survey data on corruption and values. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(2), 05–011. https://doi.org/10.1086/592840
11.
BarbabelaL. A. (2024). Positive feedback mechanism? Institutional responsiveness to bribery reporting by citizens in 12 African countries. Crime Law and Social Change, 82(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10139-9
12.
BauhrM. (2017). Need or greed? Conditions for collective action against corruption. Governance, 30(4), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12232
13.
BelloP. O. (2021). Exploring procedural justice, obligation to obey and cooperation with the police in a sample of university students. Contemporary Justice Review, 24(2), 262–277.
14.
BennettR. R.WiegandR. B. (1994). Observations on crime reporting in a developing nation. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01149.x
BoatengD. F. (2016). Crime reporting behavior: Do attitudes toward the police matter?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(18), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632356
19.
BosickS. J.RennisonC. M.GoverA. R.DodgeM. (2012). Reporting violence to the police: Predictors through the life course. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(6), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.05.001
20.
BowlesR.GarciaR. M.GaroupaN. (2009). Crime reporting decisions and the costs of crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-009-9109-8
21.
BradfordB.JacksonJ.StankoE. A. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 19(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802457594
BuehlerM. (2020). Judges, bribes, and verdicts: How court experience reshapes attitudes about judicial corruption among Morocco’s most marginalized. Mediterranean Politics, 25(5), 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2019.1620440
ChatterjeeR.SuyR. (2019). An overview of citizen satisfaction with public service: Based on the model of expectancy disconfirmation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.74019
27.
CheesemanN.PeifferC. (2022). Why efforts to fight corruption can undermine the social contract: Lessons from a survey experiment in Nigeria. Governance, 36(4), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12720
DattaloP. (2009). Statistical power analysis: Determining sample size: balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford Academic.
30.
DeiningerKWMpugaP (2004). Does greater accountability improve the quality of delivery of public services? Evidence from Uganda. World Bank Publications.
31.
FieldP. A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll. Sage.
32.
FrankB.LambsdorffJ.BoehmF. (2011). Gender and corruption: Lessons from laboratory corruption experiments. European Journal of Development Research, 23, 59–71.
33.
Gans-MorseJ.BorgesM.MakarinA.Mannah-BlanksonT.NickowA.ZhangD. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development, 105, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015
34.
GilmanS. C. (2018). To understand and to misunderstand how corruption is measured: Academic research and the corruption perception index. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S74–S88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1472974
35.
GonzalezR.MackennaB.MunozE. (2019). The experience and perception of corruption: A comparative study in 34 societies. International Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1605030
36.
GottfredsonM. R.GottfredsonD. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion (2nd ed.). Plenum.
37.
GuzyN.HirtenlehnerH. (2015). Trust in the German police: Determinants and consequences for behavior. In G. Meško & J. Tankebe (Eds.), Trust and legitimacy in criminal justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09813-5_10
38.
HartT. C.RennisonC. (2003). Reporting crime to the police, 1992-2000 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report). U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
HöglingerM.JannB.DiekmannA. (2016). Sensitive questions in online surveys: An experimental evaluation of different implementations of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model. Survey Research Methods, 10(3), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i3.6703
IvlevsA.HinksT. (2018). Former communist party membership and bribery in the post-socialist countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(4), 1411–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2018.06.001
43.
JaunkyV. C.JeetooJ.BajahC.RameshV. (2020). The importance of understanding the anti-corruption legislation to promote corruption reporting: Lessons from Mauritius. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(15), 1282–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1669049
44.
KaralashviliN.KraayA.MurrellP. (2015). Doing the survey two-step: The effects of reticence on estimates of corruption in two-stage survey questions. Policy Research Working Paper, 7276, 335–387. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7276
45.
KrumpalI. (2011). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
46.
LedenevaA. V. (2018). The global encyclopaedia of informality: Understanding social and cultural complexity. UCL Press.
47.
LeeH. D.CaoL.KimD.WooY. (2019). Police contact and confidence in the police in a medium-sized city. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 56(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.12.003
48.
MangafićJ.VeselinovićL. (2020). The determinants of corruption at the individual level: Evidence from Bosnia-Herzegovina. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 2670–2691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1723426
McCarthyL. A.GehlbachS.FryeT.BuckleyN. (2021). Who reports crime? Citizen engagement with the police in Russia and Georgia. Europe- Asia Studies, 73(1), 8–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1851354
51.
MenardS (1995) Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage. 07–106.
52.
MoldovanA.Van de WalleS. (2013). Gifts or bribes? Public Integrity, 15(4), 385–402.
53.
MonyakeM. (2019). Can the poor fight back? A multilevel analysis of corruption, poverty and collective demand for accountability in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 36(4), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2018.1548755
OnyangoG. (2022). The art of bribery! analysis of police corruption at traffic checkpoints and roadblocks in Kenya. International Review of Sociology, 32(2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2038845
56.
PeifferC. (2020). Message received? Experimental findings on how messages about corruption shape perceptions. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000108
57.
PeifferC.AlvarezL. (2016). Who will be the ‘principled-principals’? Perceptions of corruption and willing-ness to engage in anticorruption activism. Governance, 29(3), 351–369.
58.
PeifferC.RoseR. (2016). Why are the poor more vulnerable to bribery in Africa? The institutional effects of services. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1257121
59.
PosickC. (2014). Victimization and reporting to the police: The role of negative emotionality. Psychology of Violence, 4(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031770
ReisigM. D.ParksR. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094681
ReynoldsD. (2022). Decisions, decisions: An analysis of identity theft victims’ reporting to police, financial institutions, and credit bureaus.
66.
ReynsB. W.RandaR. (2015). Victim reporting behaviors following identity theft victimization: Results from the national crime victimization survey. Crime and Delinquency, 63(7), 814–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715620428
67.
RobertP.ZaubermanR.MiceliL.NévanenS.DidierE. (2010). The victim’s decision to report offences to the police in France: Stating losses or expressing attitudes. International Review of Victimology, 17(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975801001700203
RosenbaumD. P.SchuckA. M.CostelloS. K.HawkinsD. F.RingM. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271085
71.
RyvkinD.SerraD.TremewanJ. (2015). I paid a bribe: Information sharing and extortionary corruption. European Economic Review, 94(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.02.003
72.
SabinaC.CuevasC. A.SchallyJ. L. (2012). Help-seeking in a sample of victimized Latino women: The influence of victimization types. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416460
73.
SadigovT. (2017). Localization, formalism, and passivity: Symbols shaping bribe offers in Azerbaijan. Journal of Civil Society, 13(4), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2017.1387716
SchoepferA.PiqueroN. L. (2009). Studying the correlates of fraud victimization and reporting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.02.003
76.
SeligsonM. (2006). The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: Survey evidence from Latin America. World Development, 34(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.012
77.
SharmaS.SinghalS.TarpF. (2021). Corruption and mental health: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 185(c), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.008
78.
SheuC. J.ChiuS. P. (2012). Determinants of property crime victims to report to the police in Taiwan. International Review of Victimology, 18(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758012446986
79.
SidebottomA. (2015). On the correlates of reporting assault to the police in Malawi. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu083
Social Research Centre (2020). Azərbaycanda əhalinin cinayət və qanunazidd digər hərəkətlərdən zərər çəkməsi və aidiyyəti qurumlara müraciəti [Victimization of the population in Azerbaijan from criminal and other illegal actions and reporting to relevant institutions]. https://stm.az/storage/common/1620818349.2ac17-cinayetkarliq-12.pdf (accessed 01 November 2023)
82.
StevensJ. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Erlbaum. Chapter 3.
83.
SundströmA. (2013). Corruption in the commons: Why bribery hampers enforcement of environmental regulations in South African fisheries. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.370
84.
SureshK.ChandrashekaraS. (2012). Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 5(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.97779
85.
SwamyA.KnackS.LeeY.AzfarO. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 6(4), 25–55.
86.
TankebeJ. (2019). Cooperation with the police against corruption: Exploring the roles of legitimacy, deterrence and collective action theories. British Journal of Criminology, 59(6), 1390–1410. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz030
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
97.
TylerT.FaganJ.GellerA. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 751–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12055
98.
Van DammeA. (2015). The impact of police contact on trust and police legitimacy in Belgium. Policing and Society, 27(2), 205–228.
99.
van de WeijerS.LeukfeldtR.Van der ZeeS. (2020). Reporting cybercrime victimization: Determinants, motives, and previous experiences. Policing: An International Journal, 43(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2019-0122
100.
Van DijkJ. (2011). Highlights of the international crime victim’s survey. In NatarajanM. (Ed.), International crime and justice (pp. 462–470). Cambridge University Press.
101.
VerdenicciS.HoughD. (2015). People power and anti-corruption; demystifying citizen-centred approaches. Crime, Law and Social Change, 64(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9585-3
102.
WaltonG. W.PeifferC. (2017). The impacts of education and institutional trust on citizens’ willingness to report corruption: Lessons from Papua New Guinea. Australian Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2017.1374346
103.
WildH.KyröläinenA. J.KupermanV. (2022). How representative are student convenience samples? A study of literacy and numeracy skills in 32 countries. PLoS ONE, 17(7), e0271191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271191
104.
ZaykowskiH.AllainC. A.CampagnaM. L. (2019). Examining the paradox of crime reporting: Are disadvantaged victims more likely to report to the police?Law and Society Review, 53(4), 1305–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12440
105.
ZhangZ. (2014). Too much covariates in a multivariable model may cause the problem of overfitting. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 6(9), E196–E197.
106.
ZhangY. (2022). The relationship between corruption perception and depression: A multiple mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 1943–1954. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S370045
107.
ZhangL.MessnerS. F.LiuJ. (2007). An exploration of the determinants of reporting crime to the police in the city of Tianjin, China. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 45(4), 959–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00085.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
