This paper provides the first significant profile of offenders convicted of bribery in England & Wales (E&W) and Norway, based upon a sample of 75 cases from E&W and 46 from Norway, which were collected through searches of the media and other relevant sources between 2003 and 2015. The paper provides a profile of bribe payers and takers: in both E&W and Norway they are predominantly male, middle aged and involved in a median bribe of between £20,000 and £30,000; the sectors experiencing the most bribes paid are public administration and defence and the sector paying the most bribes is construction. In both countries, the period from the start of the crime to conviction was around six years. The paper also notes some significant differences between the two countries. In Norway there was a larger percentage of higher-grade professionals involved in bribery and in E&W detection by law enforcement was more common, suggesting greater interest by such bodies. The average sentence received by offenders was also slightly higher in E&W. The paper offers many other insights into the characteristics of bribery in the two countries in a rarely researched area.
BrownG (2007) Prevention of corruption: UK legislation and enforcement. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance15(2): 180–185.
4.
BrunJPDuboisPHVan der DoesdeWilleboisEHauchJJaïsSMekkiYSotiropoulouASylvesterKRUttamchandaniM (2015) Public Wrongs, Private Actions: Civil Lawsuits to Recover Stolen Assets. URL (accessed 2 March 2018): https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20456.
5.
BrymanA (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrymanA (2016) Social Research Methods, 5th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
ButtonMGeeJ (2013) Countering Fraud for Competitive Advantage. Chichester: Wiley.
8.
ButtonMBlackbournDTunleyM (2014) ‘The not so thin blue line after all?’ Investigative resources dedicated to fighting fraud/economic crime in the United Kingdom. Policing9(2): 129–142.
9.
ButtonMBrooksGLewisCAleemA (2017) Just about everybody doing the business? Explaining ‘cash-for-crash’ insurance fraud in the United Kingdom. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology50(2): 176–194.
CollieCJRGreeneKS (2017) Examining offender, victim and offence characteristics in cases of stranger child abduction: An exploratory comparison of attempted and completed cases using publicly available data from the UK. Aggression and Violent Behavior35: 73–82.
FahsingIRachlewA (2009) Investigative interviewing in the Nordic region. In: WilliamsonTMilneBSavageSP (eds) International Developments in Investigative Interviewing. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 39–62.
22.
FletcherCHerrmannD (2012) The Internationalisation of Corruption: Scale, Impact and Countermeasures. Farnham: Gower Publishing Limited.
LeviM (2008) Organized fraud and organizing frauds: Unpacking the research on networks and organization. Criminology and Criminal Justice8(4): 389–419.
30.
LeviM (2010) Hitting the suite spot: sentencing frauds. Journal of Financial Crime17(1): 116–132.
31.
LewisCBrooksGButtonMShepherdDWakefieldA (2014) Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice42(1): 3–15.
32.
LordJN (2013) Regulating transnational corporate bribery: Anti-bribery and corruption in the UK and Germany. Crime, Law and Social Change60(2): 127–145.
33.
LordJN (2015) Detecting and investigating transnational corporate bribery in centralised and decentralised enforcement systems: Discretion and (de-)prioritisation in the UK and Germany. Policing and Society25(6): 579–595.
34.
LordJNLeviM (2017) Organizing the finances for and the finances from transnational corporate bribery. European Journal of Criminology14(3): 365–389.
35.
MarshallGNewbyHRoseDVoglerC (1988) Social Class in Modern Britain. London: Hutchinson Education.
36.
MatonJ (2010) The UK Bribery Act 2010. Employee Relation Law Journal36(3): 37–45.
Ministry of Justice and Public Security (2017) En påtalemyndighet for fremtiden [A prosecutor for the future] (Norges Offentlig Utredninger [Official Norwegian Reports], NOU 2017: 5). URL (accessed 2 March 2018): https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2017-5/id2540653/.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2014) OECD Foreign Bribery Report – An Analysis of the Crime of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials. Paris: OECD Publishing. URL (accessed 2 March 2018): http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264226616-en.
43.
OlkenBAPandeR (2011) Corruption in Developing Countries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17398. URL (accessed 2 March 2018): http://www.nber.org/papers/w17398.pdf.
44.
Økokrim [Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime] (n.d.) English. URL (accessed 6 March 2018): https://www.okokrim.no/english.424311.no.html.
ParsonsS (2012) Misconduct in a public office – Should it still be prosecuted?Journal of Criminal Law76: 179–185.
49.
PohlmannMBitschKKlinkhammerJ (2016) Personal gain or organizational benefits? How to explain active corruption. German Law Journal17(1): 74–100.
50.
RobinsonE (2011) Barking driving examiner guilty of bribery escapes jail sentence. Barking and Dagenham Post, 8April.
51.
RobsonC (2011) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 3rd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
RoseC (2012) The UK Bribery Act 2010 and accompanying guidance: Belated implementation of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. International and Comparative Law Quarterly61(2): 485–499.
53.
RoseDPevalinDJ (2003) The NS-SEC explained. In: Rose D and DJ Pevalin (eds) The Researcher’s Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. London: SAGE Publications, 28–41.
SøreideT (2014) Drivers of Corruption: A Brief Review. World Bank Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0401-4. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.
56.
SutherlandEH (1941) Crime and business. In: PayneBK (ed.) White-collar Crime: A Text/Reader. London: SAGE Publications, 28–33.
Transparency International (2015) Exporting Corruption – Progress Report 2015: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combatting Foreign Bribery. URL (accessed 2 March 2018): http://www.transparency.org/exporting_corruption.
United Nations Statistics Division (2008) International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Rev 4. URL (accessed 2 March 2018): http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/isic-4.asp.
65.
Van OnnaJHVan der GeestVRHuismanWDenkersAJ (2014) Criminal trajectories of white-collar offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(6): 759–784.
66.
WeisburdDWheelerSWaringEBodeN (1991) Crimes of the Middle Classes: White-Collar Offenders in the Federal Courts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
