Young Adults’ Online and In-Person Sexual Harassment Experiences in Romantic Relationships: Exploring the Role of Relationship Type and Dark Triad Personality Traits

Abstract

As romantic relationships in young adulthood (18–25 years) are frequently characterized by experimentation and risk-taking, this could make young adults particularly vulnerable to experience sexual harassment by a dating or committed partner. This study examines young adults’ victimization and perpetration experiences of online and in-person sexual harassment with their dating or committed partner, and explores the role of the Dark Triad personality traits. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 458 young adults, 371 of whom were in a romantic relationship (M_age= 20.80, SD_age = 1.51, 25.6% men). Our findings revealed that all measured sexual harassment experiences were significantly more prevalent among young adults in dating relationships compared to those in committed relationships. Furthermore, in both relationship types, all online and in-person experiences of sexual harassment were significantly linked, indicating that these harmful experiences occur across contexts. Additionally, all victimization and perpetration experiences were significantly linked in both relationship types, meaning that some young adults were both victims and perpetrators of these behaviors. Lastly, we found that sexual harassment was linked to narcissism in dating relationships, but to Machiavellianism in committed relationships, indicating that different strategies may explain these behaviors.

Keywords

sexual harassment online versus in-person dark triad traits young adults intimate partner violence cyber dating abuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

McAuslan

Ross

(1998). Sexual assault perpetrated by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.167

Adams

J. M.

Jones

W. H.

(Eds.) (1999). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0.

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Arnett

J. J.

(1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Human Development, 41(5-6), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022591

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Bargh

J. A.

McKenna

K. Y.

Fitzsimons

G. M.

(2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247

Barlett

C. P.

Barlett

N. D.

(2015). The young and the restless: Examining the relationships between age, emerging adulthood variables, and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.024

Baruch

(2005). Bullying on the net: Adverse behavior on e-mail and its impact. Information & Management, 42(2), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.02.001

Carton

Egan

(2017). The dark triad and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.040

10.

Ceci

(2022). Distribution of TikTok users worldwide as of April 2022, by age and gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/

11.

Chiorri

Garofalo

Velotti

(2019). Does the dark triad manifest similarly in men and women? Measurement invariance of the dirty dozen across sex. Current Psychology, 38(3), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5

12.

Collins

W. A.

Welsh

D. P.

Furman

(2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459

13.

Cooper

L. B.

Paluck

E. L.

Fletcher

E. K.

Ryan

I. M.

Branscombe

N. R.

Center

T. J.

(2013). Reducing gender-based violence. In M. Ryan & N. Branscombe (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 359–378). Sage Publications.

14.

De Buck

Pauwels

L. J.

Hardyns

Ponnet

(2021). Testing measurement invariance of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen in a Belgian adult sample. Psychologica Belgica, 61(1), 377. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1106

15.

Dickinson

K. A.

Pincus

A. L.

(2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146

16.

Donath

Boyd

(2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc

17.

Douglass

C. H.

Wright

C. J.

Davis

A. C.

Lim

M. S.

(2018). Correlates of in-person and technology-facilitated sexual harassment from an online survey among young Australians. Sexual Health, 15(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17208

18.

Drouin

Ross

Tobin

(2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001

19.

Dunn

P. K.

(2005). Log-linear models. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 585–589). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00419-9

20.

Dunn

P. K.

Smyth

G. K.

(2018). Chapter 11: Positive continuous data: Gamma and inverse Gaussian GLMs. In Dunn

P. K.

Smyth

G. K.

(Eds.), Generalized linear models with examples in R (pp. 425–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0118-7_11.

21.

Espelage

D. L.

Swearer

S. M.

(2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086206

22.

European Commission. (n.d.). What is gender-based violence? Retrieved May 9, 2023, from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/gender-based-violence/what-gender-based-violence_en

23.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Gelfand

M. J.

Drasgow

(1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2

24.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Swan

Magley

V. J.

(1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In O'Donohue

(Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Allyn & Bacon.

25.

Foshee

V. A.

(1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, 11(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/11.3.275-a

26.

Galdi

Guizzo

(2021). Media-induced sexual harassment: The routes from sexually objectifying media to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84(11), 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01196-0

27.

Gardner

Steinberg

(2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625

28.

Giordano

P. C.

Manning

W. D.

Longmore

M. A.

Flanigan

C. M.

(2012). Developmental shifts in the character of romantic and sexual relationships from adolescence to young adulthood. In Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 133–164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1436-0_9

29.

Glass

Fredland

Campbell

Yonas

Sharps

Kub

(2003). Adolescent dating violence: Prevalence, risk factors, health outcomes, and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217503252033

30.

Görzig

(2016). Adolescents’ experience of offline and online risks: Separate and joint propensities. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.006

31.

Hardies

(2019). Personality, social norms, and sexual harassment in the workplace. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.07.006

32.

Horn

S. S.

Poteat

V. P.

(2022). Developmental changes in young people’s evaluations of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12516

33.

Iqbal

(2023, January 9). Tinder revenue and usage statistics 2023. Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tinder-statistics/

34.

James-Kangal

Weitbrecht

E. M.

Francis

T. E.

Whitton

S. W.

(2018). Hooking up and emerging adults’ relationship attitudes and expectations. Sexuality & Culture, 22(3), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9495-5

35.

Jonason

P. K.

Webster

G. D.

(2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265

36.

Jones

D. N.

Figueredo

A. J.

(2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893

37.

Jones

D. N.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105

38.

Jonnson

M. R.

Langille

J. I.

Walsh

(2018). The role of objectification in the victimization and perpetration of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 33(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.1.23

39.

Jovanovic

Williams

J. C.

(2018). Gender, sexual agency, and friends with benefits relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 22, 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9483-1

40.

Kernsmith

P. D.

Victor

B. G.

Smith-Darden

J. P.

(2018). Online, offline, and over the line: Coercive sexting among adolescent dating partners. Youth & Society, 50(7), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18764040

41.

Kiekens

W. J.

Baams

Fish

J. N.

Watson

R. J.

(2021). Associations of relationship experiences, dating violence, sexual harassment, and assault with alcohol use among sexual and gender minority adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17-18), NP15176–NP15204. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001469

42.

Kirsch

L. G.

Becker

J. V.

(2007). Emotional deficits in psychopathy and sexual sadism: Implications for violent and sadistic behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.011

43.

Lambrechts

Hardyns

Pauwels

(2019). De dark triad ontleed: Een meetmodel voor machiavellisme, psychopathie en narcisme. Panopticon, 40(1), 50–63.

44.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

McCullars

Misra

T. A.

(2012). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 429–468. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.429

45.

Dove

N. L.

Agnew

C. R.

Korn

M. S.

Mutso

A. A.

(2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x

46.

Ran

Zhang

(2023). The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107726

47.

Lindsay

Booth

J. M.

Messing

J. T.

Thaller

(2016). Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults: Emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3174–3195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584344

48.

Longpré

Moreton

R. E.

Snow

E. J.

Kiszel

Fitzsimons

M. A.

(2022). Dark traits, harassment and rape myths acceptances among university students. International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221139037

49.

Manning

W. D.

Longmore

M. A.

Giordano

P. C.

(2018). Cohabitation and intimate partner violence during emerging adulthood: High constraints and low commitment. Journal of Family Issues, 39(4), 1030–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16686132

50.

Maples

J. L.

Lamkin

Miller

J. D.

(2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The dirty dozen and short dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035084

51.

March

Wagstaff

D. L.

(2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02210

52.

McIlwain

(2003). Bypassing empathy: A Machiavellian theory of mind and sneaky power. In Repacholi

Slaughter

(Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 39–66). Psychology Press.

53.

Meier

Allen

(2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(2), 308–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01142.x

54.

Mishna

Khoury-Kassabri

Gadalla

Daciuk

(2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032

55.

Mitchell

K. J.

Ybarra

M. L.

Korchmaros

J. D.

(2014). Sexual harassment among adolescents of different sexual orientations and gender identities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.09.008

56.

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

57.

Mumford

E. A.

Potter

Taylor

B. G.

Stapleton

(2020). Sexual harassment and sexual assault in early adulthood: National estimates for college and non-college students. Public Health Reports, 135(5), 555–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920946014

58.

Nelder

J. A.

Wedderburn

R. W.

(1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 135(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614

59.

V. K.

Cribbie

R. A.

(2017). Using the gamma generalized linear model for modeling continuous, skewed and heteroscedastic outcomes in psychology. Current Psychology, 36(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9404-0

60.

Overall

N. C.

Hammond

M. D.

McNulty

J. K.

Finkel

E. J.

(2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000059

61.

Pailing

Boon

Egan

(2014). Personality, the dark triad and violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.018

62.

Palumbo

(2017). New data reveals high awareness among U.S. adults on what constitutes sexual assault. National Sexual Violence Resource Center. https://www.nsvrc.org/blogs/press-releases/new-data-revealshigh-awareness-among-us-adults-what-constitutes-sexual

63.

Paulhus

D. L.

Williams

K. M.

(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

64.

Rodríguez-deArriba

M. L.

Nocentini

Menesini

Sánchez-Jiménez

(2021). Dimensions and measures of cyber dating violence in adolescents: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101613

65.

Rogoza

Żemojtel-Piotrowska

Jonason

P. K.

Piotrowski

Campbell

K. W.

Gebauer

J. E.

Maltby

Sedikides

Adamovic

Adams

B. G.

Ang

R. P.

Ardi

Atitsogbe

K. A.

Baltatescu

Bilić

Bodroža

Gruneau Brulin

Bundhoo Poonoosamy

H. Y.

Chaleeraktrakoon

… Włodarczyk

(2021). Structure of dark triad dirty dozen across eight world regions. Assessment, 28(4), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120922611

66.

Sarwer

D. B.

Kalichman

S. C.

Johnson

J. R.

Early

Ali

S. A.

(1993). Sexual aggression and love styles: An exploratory study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541771

67.

Schokkenbroek

J. M.

Ponnet

Hardyns

(2022a). Men’s (online) intimate partner violence experiences and mental health: Polyvictimization, polyperpetration and victim-perpetrator overlap. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2055513

68.

Schokkenbroek

J. M.

Ponnet

Van Ouytsel

Walrave

Hardyns

(2023). Receive, forward, repeat: The link between sexting intention, sexting attitudes, and non-consensual sexting behaviours. Telematics and Informatics, 84, 102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102036

69.

Schokkenbroek

J. M.

Van Ouytsel

Hardyns

Ponnet

(2022b). Adults’ online and offline psychological intimate partner violence experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15-16), NP14656–NP14671. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211015217

70.

Schwartz

S. J.

(2016). Turning point for a turning point: Advancing emerging adulthood theory and research. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815624640

71.

Sillito Walker

S. D.

Bonner

B. L.

(2022). An approach–avoidance lens on sexual harassment: The effects of relative attractiveness, gender, relationship status, and role. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09729-w

72.

Sinozich

Langton

(2014). Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995-2013 (Special report). U.S. Department of Justice.

73.

Strelan

(2007). Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.017

74.

Szabó

Jones

D. N.

(2019). Gender differences moderate Machiavellianism and impulsivity: Implications for dark triad research. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.008

75.

Szijjarto

Bereczkei

(2015). The Machiavellians’ “Cool Syndrome”: They experience intensive feelings but have difficulties in expressing their emotions. Current Psychology, 34(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9262-1

76.

Taquette

S. R.

Monteiro

D. L. M.

(2019). Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: A systematic review. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 11(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1061

77.

Taylor

Xia

(2018). Cyber partner abuse: A systematic review. Violence and victims, 33(6), 983–1011. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.6.983

78.

Trajtenberg

Dodel

Sanchez De Ribera

Cabello

Claro

(2021). Online and offline victimisation: A cluster analysis of adolescent victims of bullying and cyber-bullying in Chile. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1902358

79.

Vanheusden

Mulder

C. L.

van der Ende

van Lenthe

F. J.

Mackenbach

J. P.

Verhulst

F. C.

(2008). Young adults face major barriers to seeking help from mental health services. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.006

80.

Volpe

E. M.

Hardie

T. L.

Cerulli

Sommers

M. S.

Morrison-Beedy

(2013). What’s age got to do with it? Partner age difference, power, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk in urban adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(10), 2068–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512471082

81.

Wayne

J. H.

(2000). Disentangling the power bases of sexual harassment: Comparing gender, age, and position power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1750

82.

Wiener

R. L.

Gervais

S. J.

Allen

Marquez

(2013). Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028497

83.

Witte

T. H.

Mulla

M. M.

Weaver

A. A.

(2015). Perceived social norms for intimate partner violence in proximal and distal groups. Violence and Victims, 30(4), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00136

84.

Ybarra

M. L.

Mitchell

K. J.

(2014). “Sexting” and its relation to sexual activity and sexual risk behavior in a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012

85.

Zeigler-Hill

Besser

Morag

Campbell

W. K.

(2016). The dark triad and sexual harassment proclivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.048

86.

Zimbroff

(2007). Cultural differences in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 14(2), 1311–1342.

87.

Zweig

J. M.

Lachman

Yahner

Dank

(2014). Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB