Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-9
Young Adults’ Online and In-Person Sexual Harassment Experiences in Romantic Relationships: Exploring the Role of Relationship Type and Dark Triad Personality Traits
As romantic relationships in young adulthood (18–25 years) are frequently characterized by experimentation and risk-taking, this could make young adults particularly vulnerable to experience sexual harassment by a dating or committed partner. This study examines young adults’ victimization and perpetration experiences of online and in-person sexual harassment with their dating or committed partner, and explores the role of the Dark Triad personality traits. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 458 young adults, 371 of whom were in a romantic relationship (Mage = 20.80, SDage = 1.51, 25.6% men). Our findings revealed that all measured sexual harassment experiences were significantly more prevalent among young adults in dating relationships compared to those in committed relationships. Furthermore, in both relationship types, all online and in-person experiences of sexual harassment were significantly linked, indicating that these harmful experiences occur across contexts. Additionally, all victimization and perpetration experiences were significantly linked in both relationship types, meaning that some young adults were both victims and perpetrators of these behaviors. Lastly, we found that sexual harassment was linked to narcissism in dating relationships, but to Machiavellianism in committed relationships, indicating that different strategies may explain these behaviors.
AbbeyA.McAuslanP.RossL. (1998). Sexual assault perpetrated by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.167
2.
AdamsJ. M.JonesW. H. (Eds.) (1999). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0.
3.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
4.
ArnettJ. J. (1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Human Development, 41(5-6), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022591
BarghJ. A.McKennaK. Y.FitzsimonsG. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247
7.
BarlettC. P.BarlettN. D. (2015). The young and the restless: Examining the relationships between age, emerging adulthood variables, and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.024
8.
BaruchY. (2005). Bullying on the net: Adverse behavior on e-mail and its impact. Information & Management, 42(2), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.02.001
ChiorriC.GarofaloC.VelottiP. (2019). Does the dark triad manifest similarly in men and women? Measurement invariance of the dirty dozen across sex. Current Psychology, 38(3), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5
CooperL. B.PaluckE. L.FletcherE. K.RyanI. M.BranscombeN. R.CenterT. J. (2013). Reducing gender-based violence. In M. Ryan & N. Branscombe (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 359–378). Sage Publications.
14.
De BuckA.PauwelsL. J.HardynsW.PonnetK. (2021). Testing measurement invariance of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen in a Belgian adult sample. Psychologica Belgica, 61(1), 377. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1106
15.
DickinsonK. A.PincusA. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146
DouglassC. H.WrightC. J.DavisA. C.LimM. S. (2018). Correlates of in-person and technology-facilitated sexual harassment from an online survey among young Australians. Sexual Health, 15(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17208
18.
DrouinM.RossJ.TobinE. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression?Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001
19.
DunnP. K. (2005). Log-linear models. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 585–589). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00419-9
20.
DunnP. K.SmythG. K. (2018). Chapter 11: Positive continuous data: Gamma and inverse Gaussian GLMs. In DunnP. K.SmythG. K. (Eds.), Generalized linear models with examples in R (pp. 425–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0118-7_11.
21.
EspelageD. L.SwearerS. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here?School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086206
FitzgeraldL. F.GelfandM. J.DrasgowF. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2
24.
FitzgeraldL. F.SwanS.MagleyV. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In O'DonohueW. (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Allyn & Bacon.
25.
FosheeV. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, 11(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/11.3.275-a
26.
GaldiS.GuizzoF. (2021). Media-induced sexual harassment: The routes from sexually objectifying media to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84(11), 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01196-0
27.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
28.
GiordanoP. C.ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.FlaniganC. M. (2012). Developmental shifts in the character of romantic and sexual relationships from adolescence to young adulthood. In Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 133–164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1436-0_9
29.
GlassN.FredlandN.CampbellJ.YonasM.SharpsP.KubJ. (2003). Adolescent dating violence: Prevalence, risk factors, health outcomes, and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217503252033
30.
GörzigA. (2016). Adolescents’ experience of offline and online risks: Separate and joint propensities. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.006
31.
HardiesK. (2019). Personality, social norms, and sexual harassment in the workplace. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.07.006
32.
HornS. S.PoteatV. P. (2022). Developmental changes in young people’s evaluations of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12516
33.
IqbalM. (2023, January 9). Tinder revenue and usage statistics 2023. Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tinder-statistics/
34.
James-KangalN.WeitbrechtE. M.FrancisT. E.WhittonS. W. (2018). Hooking up and emerging adults’ relationship attitudes and expectations. Sexuality & Culture, 22(3), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9495-5
35.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
36.
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
37.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
38.
JonnsonM. R.LangilleJ. I.WalshZ. (2018). The role of objectification in the victimization and perpetration of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 33(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.1.23
39.
JovanovicJ.WilliamsJ. C. (2018). Gender, sexual agency, and friends with benefits relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 22, 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9483-1
40.
KernsmithP. D.VictorB. G.Smith-DardenJ. P. (2018). Online, offline, and over the line: Coercive sexting among adolescent dating partners. Youth & Society, 50(7), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18764040
41.
KiekensW. J.BaamsL.FishJ. N.WatsonR. J. (2021). Associations of relationship experiences, dating violence, sexual harassment, and assault with alcohol use among sexual and gender minority adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17-18), NP15176–NP15204. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001469
42.
KirschL. G.BeckerJ. V. (2007). Emotional deficits in psychopathy and sexual sadism: Implications for violent and sadistic behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.011
43.
LambrechtsC.HardynsW.PauwelsL. (2019). De dark triad ontleed: Een meetmodel voor machiavellisme, psychopathie en narcisme. Panopticon, 40(1), 50–63.
44.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.McCullarsA.MisraT. A. (2012). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 429–468. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.429
45.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
46.
LiJ.RanG.ZhangQ.HeX. (2023). The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107726
47.
LindsayM.BoothJ. M.MessingJ. T.ThallerJ. (2016). Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults: Emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3174–3195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584344
48.
LongpréN.MoretonR. E.SnowE. J.KiszelF.FitzsimonsM. A. (2022). Dark traits, harassment and rape myths acceptances among university students. International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221139037
49.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2018). Cohabitation and intimate partner violence during emerging adulthood: High constraints and low commitment. Journal of Family Issues, 39(4), 1030–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16686132
50.
MaplesJ. L.LamkinJ.MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The dirty dozen and short dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035084
51.
MarchE.WagstaffD. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02210
52.
McIlwainD. (2003). Bypassing empathy: A Machiavellian theory of mind and sneaky power. In RepacholiB.SlaughterV. (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 39–66). Psychology Press.
53.
MeierA.AllenG. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(2), 308–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01142.x
54.
MishnaF.Khoury-KassabriM.GadallaT.DaciukJ. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032
55.
MitchellK. J.YbarraM. L.KorchmarosJ. D. (2014). Sexual harassment among adolescents of different sexual orientations and gender identities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.09.008
56.
MoshagenM.HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111
57.
MumfordE. A.PotterS.TaylorB. G.StapletonJ. (2020). Sexual harassment and sexual assault in early adulthood: National estimates for college and non-college students. Public Health Reports, 135(5), 555–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920946014
58.
NelderJ. A.WedderburnR. W. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 135(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614
59.
NgV. K.CribbieR. A. (2017). Using the gamma generalized linear model for modeling continuous, skewed and heteroscedastic outcomes in psychology. Current Psychology, 36(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9404-0
60.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D.McNultyJ. K.FinkelE. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000059
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
64.
Rodríguez-deArribaM. L.NocentiniA.MenesiniE.Sánchez-JiménezV. (2021). Dimensions and measures of cyber dating violence in adolescents: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101613
65.
RogozaR.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.JonasonP. K.PiotrowskiJ.CampbellK. W.GebauerJ. E.MaltbyJ.SedikidesC.AdamovicM.AdamsB. G.AngR. P.ArdiR.AtitsogbeK. A.BaltatescuS.BilićS.BodrožaB.Gruneau BrulinJ.Bundhoo PoonoosamyH. Y.ChaleeraktrakoonT.… WłodarczykA. (2021). Structure of dark triad dirty dozen across eight world regions. Assessment, 28(4), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120922611
66.
SarwerD. B.KalichmanS. C.JohnsonJ. R.EarlyJ.AliS. A. (1993). Sexual aggression and love styles: An exploratory study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541771
67.
SchokkenbroekJ. M.PonnetK.HardynsW. (2022a). Men’s (online) intimate partner violence experiences and mental health: Polyvictimization, polyperpetration and victim-perpetrator overlap. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2055513
68.
SchokkenbroekJ. M.PonnetK.Van OuytselJ.WalraveM.HardynsW. (2023). Receive, forward, repeat: The link between sexting intention, sexting attitudes, and non-consensual sexting behaviours. Telematics and Informatics, 84, 102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102036
69.
SchokkenbroekJ. M.Van OuytselJ.HardynsW.PonnetK. (2022b). Adults’ online and offline psychological intimate partner violence experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15-16), NP14656–NP14671. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211015217
70.
SchwartzS. J. (2016). Turning point for a turning point: Advancing emerging adulthood theory and research. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815624640
71.
Sillito WalkerS. D.BonnerB. L. (2022). An approach–avoidance lens on sexual harassment: The effects of relative attractiveness, gender, relationship status, and role. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09729-w
72.
SinozichS.LangtonL. (2014). Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995-2013 (Special report). U.S. Department of Justice.
73.
StrelanP. (2007). Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.017
74.
SzabóE.JonesD. N. (2019). Gender differences moderate Machiavellianism and impulsivity: Implications for dark triad research. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.008
75.
SzijjartoL.BereczkeiT. (2015). The Machiavellians’ “Cool Syndrome”: They experience intensive feelings but have difficulties in expressing their emotions. Current Psychology, 34(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9262-1
76.
TaquetteS. R.MonteiroD. L. M. (2019). Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: A systematic review. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 11(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1061
TrajtenbergN.DodelM.Sanchez De RiberaO.CabelloP.ClaroM. (2021). Online and offline victimisation: A cluster analysis of adolescent victims of bullying and cyber-bullying in Chile. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1902358
79.
VanheusdenK.MulderC. L.van der EndeJ.van LentheF. J.MackenbachJ. P.VerhulstF. C. (2008). Young adults face major barriers to seeking help from mental health services. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.006
80.
VolpeE. M.HardieT. L.CerulliC.SommersM. S.Morrison-BeedyD. (2013). What’s age got to do with it? Partner age difference, power, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk in urban adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(10), 2068–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512471082
81.
WayneJ. H. (2000). Disentangling the power bases of sexual harassment: Comparing gender, age, and position power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1750
82.
WienerR. L.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.MarquezA. (2013). Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028497
83.
WitteT. H.MullaM. M.WeaverA. A. (2015). Perceived social norms for intimate partner violence in proximal and distal groups. Violence and Victims, 30(4), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00136
84.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2014). “Sexting” and its relation to sexual activity and sexual risk behavior in a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012
85.
Zeigler-HillV.BesserA.MoragJ.CampbellW. K. (2016). The dark triad and sexual harassment proclivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.048
86.
ZimbroffJ. (2007). Cultural differences in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 14(2), 1311–1342.
87.
ZweigJ. M.LachmanP.YahnerJ.DankM. (2014). Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
