Besides its multiple harms, corruption undermines the rule of law and impedes the effective functioning of criminal justice institutions. It involves both elites in bending rules and laws as well as police at the bottom of the hierarchy asking for bribes. We analyze corruption intentions within the framework of Brennan and Pettit’s “economy of esteem,” using three main conceptual frameworks: attachment to kinship groups, materialistic orientations, and deterrence. We draw on data from a survey of 530 university students in Ghana to examine predictors of corruption intentions of prospective elites. Our prospective elites were more inclined to resort to influence peddling rather than to pay bribes directly. We find that attitudinal patterns indicative of esteem predict intentions to engage in corrupt exchanges across different agencies and contexts—police, procurement for government, and abuse of power—as well as different types of action, whether bribe payment or nepotism. In contrast, citizenly pride (and self-esteem) motivates integrity across all types of corrupt exchange. Deterrence, in terms of certainty, had a more consistently negative impact on intentions to engage in nepotism than in bribe paying and acceptance, with public procurement being the exception; no effect was found for stigma, and only police nepotism was an exception to the otherwise non-significant effects of severity.
AbotchieC. (1997). Social control in traditional Southern Eweland of Ghana: Relevance for modern crime prevention. Accra, Ghana: Ghana Universities Press.
2.
ArmantierO.BolyA. (2011). A controlled field experiment on corruption. European Economic Review, 55, 1072–1082.
3.
AssimengM. J. (1999). Social structure of Ghana: A study in persistence and change. Accra, Ghana: Ghana.
BeckerG. S.StiglerG. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 1–18.
7.
BelkR. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 291–297.
BottomsA. E.von HirschA. (2010). The crime-preventive impact of penal sanctions. In CaneP.KritzerH. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of empirical legal research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
10.
BrennanG.PettitP. (2004). The economy of esteem: An essay on civil and political society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
BrownsbergerW. N. (1983). Development and governmental corruption—Materialism and political fragmentation in Nigeria. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 21, 215–233.
12.
CupitG. (2000). When does justice require impartiality. In London: Political Studies Association-UK 50th Annual Conference, April (pp. 10–13).
FismanR.MiguelE. (2010). Economic gangsters. Corruption, violence and the poverty of nations. Princeton, PA: Princeton University Press.
20.
FoltzJ. D.Opoku-AgyemangK. A. (2015). Do higher salaries lower petty corruption?A Policy Experiment on West Africa’s Highways. 1–47.
21.
GeertzC. (1963). The integrative revolution. In GeertzC. (Eds.), Old societies and new states. New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
23.
GrasmickH. G.BryjakG. J. (1980). The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment. Social forces, 59, 471–491.
24.
HeathA. F.RichardsL.Nan Dirk de GraafN. D. (2016). Explaining corruption in the developed world: The potential of sociological approaches. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 51–79.
25.
HigleyJ.BurtonM. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
KarstedtS. (2014). State crime: The European experience. In Body-GendrotS.HoughM.KerezsiK.LévyR.SnackenS. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of European criminology (pp. 125–153). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
27.
KarstedtS.FarrallS. (2006). The moral economy of everyday crime: Markets, consumers and citizens. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1011–1036.
28.
KashdanT. B.BreenW. E. (2007). Materialism and diminished well-being: Experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 521–539.
29.
LambsdorffJ. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LiS.TriandisH. C.YuY. (2006). Cultural orientation and corruption. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 199–215.
31.
MbakuJ. M. (2010). Corruption in Africa: Causes, consequences, and clean-ups. Plymouth, England: Lexington Books.
32.
Mungiu-PippidiA. (2006). Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Democracy, 17, 86–99.
33.
NaginD. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42, 199–263.
NewellS. (2006). Estranged belongings: A moral economy of theft in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. Anthropological Theory, 6, 179–203.
36.
NivetteA.AkoensiT. (2017). Determinants of satisfaction with police in a developing country: A randomised vignette study. Policing and Society. doi:10.1080/10439463.2017.1380643
37.
OlkenB. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 200–249.
38.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.
39.
PfeifferC. (2018). Message received? Experimental findings on how messages about corruption shape perceptions. British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000108
40.
RichinsM. L.DawsonS. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.
41.
Rose-AckermanS.PalifkaJ. B. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RothsteinB. (2011). Anti-corruption: The indirect ‘big bang’ approach. Review of International Political Economy, 18, 228–250.
43.
ShermanW. L. (1978). Scandal and reform: Controlling police corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
ShilsE. (1957). Primordial, personal, sacred and civil ties. British Journal of Sociology, 8, 130–145.
45.
SmithA. (1759/2002). The theory of moral sentiments. In KnudH. (Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46.
StevensA. (2016). Configurations of corruption: A cross-national qualitative comparative analysis of levels of perceived corruption. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57, 183–206.
47.
SwamyA.KnackS.LeeY.AzfarO. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 25–55.
48.
SzeftelM. (2000). Clientelism, corruption and catastrophe. Review of African Political Economy, 27, 427–441.
49.
TankebeJ. (2010). Public confidence in the police testing the effects of public experiences of police corruption in Ghana. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 296–319.
50.
ThomasK. J.HamiltonB. C.LoughranT. A. (2018). Testing the transitivity of reported risk perceptions: Evidence of coherent arbitrariness. Criminology, 56, 59–86.
51.
TheobaldR. (1999). So what really is the problem about corruption?Third World Quarterly, 20, 491–502.
52.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2017). Ghana: Education and literacy. Retrieved April 19, 2018, fromhttp://uis.unesco.org/country/GH
53.
Van VeldhuizenR. (2013). The influence of wages on public officials’ corruptibility: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 341–356.
54.
VeblenT. (2009). The theory of the leisure class. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press(Originally published in 1899).
