Visibly deterring potential adversaries is central to security risk assessment and planning operations within many agencies including the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Many visible security elements are employed by TSA toward these goals. Questions remain whether these elements deter/displace attackers, and answers are elusive in these data-poor contexts. Using a novel adversarial exercise with a national sample, our paired conjoint experiment across visibly-changing aviation environments finds the majority of tested security infrastructure visibly deterred simulated adversaries. Canine officer presence deterred, biometric scanners induced, and queue density had no appreciable effect upon target selection. Our findings offer useful criminological insights, clear policy applications, and novel quantitative methods for assessing visible deterrent processes in limited data environments.
AguinisH.VillamorI.RamaniR. S. (2021). MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 47(4), 823–837.
2.
AnwarS.LoughranT. A. (2011). Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 49(3), 667–698.
3.
ApelR. (2022). Sanctions, perceptions, and crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(16), 205–227.
4.
BeccariaC. (1963 [1764]). On crimes and punishments. Bobbs-Merrill.
5.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In FieldingN. G.ClarkeA.WittR. (Eds.), The economic dimensions of crime (pp. 13–68). Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BenthamJ. (1988 [1789]). The principles of morals and legislation. Prometheus Books.
7.
BerryessaC. M. (2021). The potential influence of criminological rationales in considering childhood abuse as mitigating to sentencing. Child Abuse & Neglect, 111, 104818.
8.
BorumR. (2004). Psychology of terrorism. University of South Florida.
9.
BouffardJ. A.NiebuhrN. (2017). Experimental designs in the study of offender decision making. In BernascoW.van ElffersJ. -L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of offender decision making (pp 479–497). Oxford University Press.
10.
CarrollJ.WeaverF. (2017). Shoplifters’ perceptions of crime opportunities: A process-tracing study. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal (pp. 19–38). Routledge.
11.
CarsonJ. V.DuganL.YangS. M. (2020). A comprehensive application of rational choice theory: How costs imposed by, and benefits derived from, the US federal government affect incidents perpetrated by the radical eco-movement. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 701–724.
12.
ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An Mturk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473.
13.
ClarkeR. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime and Justice, 4, 225–256.
14.
ClarkeR. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.
15.
ClarkeR.CornishD. (1985). Modelling offender’s decisions: A framework for policy and research. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6, pp. 147–185). University of Chicago Press.
16.
ClarkeR.NewmanG. R. (2006). Outsmarting the terrorists. Praeger Security Intl.
17.
DuganL.LaFreeG.PiqueroA. R. (2005). Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminology, 43(4), 1031–1065.
18.
EklblomP.TilleyN. (2000). Going equipped. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 376–398.
19.
FisherD.KearnsE. M. (2024). The theorizing of terrorism within criminology. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 61, 487–520.
20.
FoldS. L.RobinsonD. T. (1998). Secondary bystander effects on intimate violence: When norms of restraint reduce deterrence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 277–285.
FrederickS. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
23.
FreilichJ. D.GruenewaldJ.MandalaM. (2019). Situational crime prevention and terrorism: An assessment of 10 years of research. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(9), 1283–1311.
24.
GeerkenM. R.GoveW. R. (1975). Deterrence: Some theoretical considerations. Law & Society Review, 9, 497.
25.
GibbsJ. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. Elseveir Scientific Publishing Co.
26.
GillP.MarchmentZ.CornerE.BouhanaN. (2020). Terrorist decision making in the context of risk, attack planning, and attack commission. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(2), 145–160.
Government Accountability Office. (2017). GAO-17-794: Aviation security: Actions needed to systematically evaluate cost and effectiveness across security countermeasures. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/clpdo07.pdf
29.
Government Accountability Office. (2019). GAO-19-633T: Aviation security: TSA has taken steps to conduct more risk-informed covert tests and address vulnerabilities.
30.
Government Accountability Office. (2022). GAO-22-106154: Facial recognition technology: CBP traveler identity verification and efforts to address privacy issues.
31.
GruenewaldJ.Allison-GruenewaldK.KleinB. R. (2015). Assessing the attractiveness and vulnerability of eco-terrorism targets: A situational crime prevention approach. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(6), 433–455.
32.
HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.YamamotoT. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(8), 2395–2400.
HorneyJ.MarshallI. H. (1992). Risk perceptions among serious offenders: The role of crime and punishment. Criminology, 30(4), 575–594.
35.
JacobsB. A. (2010). Deterrence and deterrability. Criminology, 48(2), 417–441.
36.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage.
37.
JaynesC. M.WilsonT. (2022). Dreading delayed punishment: Reconceptualizing sanction “celerity”. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(3), 285–303.
38.
KennedyJ. P.RorieM.BensonM. L. (2021). COVID-19 frauds: An exploratory study of victimization during a global crisis. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(3), 493–543.
39.
KoperC. S. (1995). Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 649–672.
40.
LaFreeG.JensenM. A.JamesP. A.Safer-LichtensteinA. (2018). Correlates of violent political extremism in the United States. Criminology, 56(2), 233–268.
41.
LochnerL. (2007). Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. American Economic Review, 97(1), 444–460.
42.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.ChalfinA.WilsonT. (2016). Can rational choice be considered a general theory of crime? Evidence from individual-level panel data. Criminology, 54(1), 86–112.
43.
LumC.KoperC. S.TelepC. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 3–26.
44.
MandalaM.FreilichJ. D. (2018). Disrupting terrorist assassinations through situational crime prevention. Crime & Delinquency, 64(12), 1515–1537.
45.
MarchmentZ.GillP. (2019). Modelling the spatial decision making of terrorists: The discrete choice approach. Applied Geography, 104, 21–31.
46.
MatsuedaR. L.KreagerD. A.HuizingaD. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95–122.
47.
McMillenD.Sarmiento-BarbieriI.SinghR. (2019). Do more eyes on the street reduce Crime? Evidence from Chicago’s safe passage program. Journal of Urban Economics, 110, 1–25.
48.
MidgetteG.KilmerB.NicosiaN.HeatonP. (2021). A natural experiment to test the effect of sanction certainty and celerity on substance-impaired driving: North Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Program. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37(3), 647–670.
49.
MoellerK.CopesH.HochstetlerA. (2016). Advancing restrictive deterrence: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 82–93.
50.
Möller-LeimkühlerA. M. (2018). Why is terrorism a man’s business?CNS Spectrums, 23(2), 119–128.
51.
NaginD. S. (2013a). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263.
52.
NaginD. S. (2013b). Deterrence: A review of the evidence by a criminologist for economists. Annual Review of Economics, 5, 83–105.
53.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39(4), 865–892.
NeeC.van GelderJ. L.OtteM.VernhamZ.MeenaghanA. (2019). Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments. Criminology, 57(3), 481–511.
56.
PaternosterR. (2018). Perceptual deterrence theory. In NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (Eds.), Deterrence, choice, and crime (pp. 81–106). Routledge.
57.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.
58.
PauwelsL. J.SvenssonR.HirtenlehnerH. (2018). Testing situational action theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55.
59.
PerryS.ApelR.NewmanG. R.ClarkeR. V. (2017). The situational prevention of terrorism: An evaluation of the Israeli West Bank barrier. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 727–751.
60.
PöyhönenV.JuvonenJ.SalmivalliC. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21(4), 722–741.
61.
PützO. (2012). From non-places to non-events: The airport security checkpoint. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(2), 154–188.
62.
RobinsonA.MarchmentZ.GillP. (2019). Domestic extremist criminal damage events: Behaving like criminals or terrorists?Security Journal, 32, 153–167.
63.
RocheS. P.PickettJ. T.IntraviaJ.ThompsonA. J. (2022). On the measurement of subjective apprehension risk. Criminal Justice Review, 47(1), 77–93.
SaltzmanL.PaternosterR.WaldoG. P.ChiricosT. G. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19(2), 172–189.
66.
SchneierB. (2003). Beyond fear: Thinking sensibly about security in an uncertain world. Copernicus.
67.
ScrivensR.VenkateshV.BérubéM.GaudetteT. (2022). Combating violent extremism: Voices of former right-wing extremists. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 45(8), 661–681.
68.
ShermanL. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. Crime and Justice, 12, 1––48.
69.
StaffordM. C.WarrM. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123–135.
70.
START (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism). (2022). Global Terrorism Database 1970 - 2020 [data file]. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
TangJ.BirrellE.LernerA. (2022, August8–9). Replication: How well do my results generalize now? The external validity of online privacy and security surveys. Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022) [Symposium], Boston, MA, (pp. 367–385).
73.
TaylorE. (2017). ‘I should have been a security consultant’: The Good Lives Model and residential Burglars. European Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 434–450.
74.
ThomasK. J.LoughranT. A.PiqueroA. R. (2013). Do individual characteristics explain variation in sanction risk updating among serious juvenile offenders? Advancing the logic of differential deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 37(1), 10.
75.
TopalliV. (2005). Criminal expertise and offender decision-making: An experimental analysis of how offenders and non-offenders differentially perceive social stimuli. The British Journal of Criminology, 45, 269–295.
Van GelderJ. L.NeeC.OtteM.DemetriouA.Van SintemaartensdijkI.Van ProoijenJ. W. (2017). Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 29–62.
80.
van SintemaartensdijkI.Van GelderJ. L.Van ProoijenJ. W.NeeC.OtteM.Van LangeP. (2021). Mere presence of informal guardians deters burglars: A virtual reality study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(4), 657–676.
81.
WilsonT.PaternosterR.LoughranT. (2017). Direct and indirect experiential effects in an updating model of deterrence: A research note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 63–77.
82.
YangS. M.JenI. C. (2018). An evaluation of displacement and diffusion effects on eco-terrorist activities after police interventions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 1103–1123.
83.
ZackE. S.KennedyJ. M.Scott LongJ. (2019). Can nonprobability samples be used for social science research? A cautionary tale. Survey Research Methods, 13(2), 215–227.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
