Community safety officers (CSOs) have been prominent local security providers in the United Kingdom, Australia, and elsewhere for two decades. Examining the establishment of CSOs in cities in Western Canada, this article responds to calls for international, comparative research on CSOs. We demonstrate that CSO establishment in Canada has not entailed a straightforward transfer of criminal justice policy. Instead, there have been policy mutations, most notably when the Royal Canadian Mounted Police implemented a pilot CSO program in several cities. By examining CSO programs and practices in Canada, we contribute to international literature on CSOs as well as related debates about reassurance and community policing.
Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA) Standing Committee on Community Infrastructure. (2007, November 9). Meeting minutes.
2.
BaileyJ. (2003). Community safety officers…What do they do?Community Safety Journal, 2, 29–32.
3.
BarkerA.CrawfordA. (2013). Policing urban insecurities through visible patrols: Managing public expectations in times of fiscal restraint. In LippertR.WalbyK. (Eds.), Policing cities: Urban securitization and regulation in a 21st century world (pp. 11–28). London, England: Routledge.
4.
BazemanG.GriffithsC. (2004). Police reform, restorative justice and restorative policing. Police Practice and Research, 4, 335–346.
5.
BenzA.FürstD. (2002). Policy learning in regional networks. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9, 21–35.
6.
BerginT. (2011). How and why do criminal justice public policies spread throughout the United States?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 403–421.
7.
BrogdenM.NijharP. (2005). Community Policing: National and International Models and Approaches. Portland, OR: Willan.
8.
City of Langford. (2007a). Langford Community Safety and Policing Support UBCM community excellence award application.
9.
City of Langford. (2007b). City of Langford 2007 Annual Report.
10.
City of Langford. (2009). Langford Community Safety and Policing Support Initiative Summary.
CherneyA. (2004). Contingency and politics: The local government community safety officer role. Criminal Justice, 4, 115–128.
15.
CherneyA.SuttonA. (2004). Aussie experience: Local government community safety officers and capacity building. Community Safety Journal, 3, 31–35.
16.
ColleyT. (2007, December 07). More police coming in new Surrey budget; plan also include 10 community safety officers. Now [Surrey].
17.
Community safety officers set to hit the streets. (2008, July 11). Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows Times.
18.
CooperC.AnscombeJ.AvenellJ.McLeanF.MorrisJ. (2006). A national evaluation of community support officers. London, England: Home Office Research Study297.
19.
CrawfordA.ListerS, (2004). The patchwork shape of reassurance policing in England and Wales. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27, 413–430.
20.
DeukmedjianJ.de LintW. (2007). Community into intelligence: Resolving information uptake in the RCMP. Policing & Society, 17, 239–256.
21.
EdwardsA.HughesG. (2008). Inventing community safety. In PCarlen, (Ed.), Imaginary penalities (pp. 64–83). Devon: Willan
22.
EdwardsA.HughesG. (2011). Public safety regimes: Negotiated orders and political analysis in criminology. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12, 433–458.
23.
EdwardsA.HughesG.LordN. (2013). Urban security in Europe: Translating a concept in public criminology. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 260–283.
24.
FieldingN.InnesM. (2006). Reassurance policing, community policing and measuring police performance. Policing and Society, 16, 127–145.
25.
GillingD. (2001). Community safety and social policy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9, 381–400.
26.
GillingD.HughesG. (2002). The community safety ‘profession’: Towards a new expertise in the governance of crime, disorder and safety in the UK?Community Safety Journal, 1, 4–12.
27.
GillingD.HughesG.BowdenM.EdwardsA.HenryA.ToppingJ. (2013). Powers, liabilities and expertise in community safety: Comparative lessons for ‘urban security’ from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 326–340.
28.
GoldsteinH. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29.
HaywoodJ.KauttP.WhitakerA. (2009). The effects of ‘Alley-Gating’ in an English town. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 361–381.
30.
HierS.WalbyK. (2014). Policy mutations, compliance myths, and re-deployable special event public camera surveillance in Canada. Sociology, 48, 150–166.
31.
HodgkinsonS.TilleyN. (2011). Tackling anti-social behavior: Lessons from new labour for the Coalition government. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11, 283–305.
32.
HopeT. (2005). The new local governance of community safety in England and Wales. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 47, 369–387.
33.
HughesG.GillingD. (2004). ‘Mission impossible?’ The habitus of the community safety manager and the new expertise in the local partnership governance of crime and safety. Criminal Justice, 4, 129–149.
34.
JonesT.NewburnT. (2007). Policy transfer and criminal justice. Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill.
35.
LambertE.WuY.ElechiO.JiangS. (2012). Correlates of support for community-police partnerships in policing among Nigerian and US college students. International Criminal Justice Review, 22, 276–296.
36.
Langford Mulls Municipal Security Patrol. (2006, February 8). Victoria Times Colonist.
37.
LippertR.WalbyK.SteckleR. (2013). Multiplicities of corporate security: Identifying emerging types and trends. Security Journal, 26, 206–221.
38.
McAraL. (2008). Crime, criminology and criminal justice in Scotland. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 481–504.
39.
McCannE. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40, 885–904.
40.
MonaghanR. (2008). Community-based justice in Northern Ireland and South Africa. International Criminal Justice Review, 18, 83–105.
41.
MurphyC. (1998). The development, impact and implications of community policing in Canada. In MastrofskiS.GreenJ. (Eds.), Community policing reality or rhetoric (pp. 178–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
PeckJ. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 773–797.
SchachterH. (1991) Bailing interviewing: A case study of a cross-national policy transfer. International Criminal Justice Review, 1, 21–34.
48.
SchneiderS. (2000). Organizational obstacles to participation in community crime prevention programs. International Criminal Justice Review, 10, 32–53.
49.
ShepherdsonP.ClanceyG.LeeM.CroftsT. (2014). Community safety and crime prevention partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3, 107–120.
50.
SleimanM.LippertR. (2010). Downtown ambassadors, police relations and ‘clean and safe’ security. Policing and Society, 20, 316–335.
51.
WalbyK.LippertR. (2012). The new keys to the city: Uploading corporate security and threat discourse into Canadian municipal governments. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 437–455.
52.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London, England: Sage.
