This research provides an in-depth exploration of the relation between police rank and police integrity. In 2008, a stratified representative sample of 1,130 Croatian police officers evaluated hypothetical scenarios describing a range of various forms of police misconduct. Supervisors tended to be somewhat more knowledgeable of official rules than nonsupervisors. Although absolute evaluations of seriousness differed across the two groups, relative assessments of seriousness were quite similar. Line officer and supervisor views were more similar with respect to the discipline they thought the police agency should mete out than with respect to what they thought the appropriate discipline should be. The analyses indicate that there are two similar, yet distinct codes of silence, with the supervisor code being narrower than the line officer code.
Cajner-MraovićI.FaberV.VolarevićG. (2003). Strategija djelovanja policija u zajednici. Zagreb, Croatia: Ministry of the Interior.
2.
Constitution(Zagreb, Croatia: Narodne novine 56/90, 1990).
3.
Criminal Code(Zagreb, Croatia: Narodne novine 110/97, 1997).
4.
Criminal Justice Commission. (1995). Ethical conduct and discipline in the Queensland police service: The views of recruits, first year constables, and experienced officers. Brisbane, Australia: Criminal Justice Commission.
5.
Criminal Procedure Code(Zagreb, Croatia: Narodne novine 110/97, 1997).
6.
DerenčinovićD. (2000). Kaznenopravni sadrzaji u suprotstavljanju korupciji(Unpublished doctoral dissertation)Zagreb, Croatia.
7.
FričP.WalekC. (2001). Crossing the thin blue line. Prague, Czech Republic: Transparency International CR.
8.
HuonG. F.HeskethB. L.FrankM. G.McConkeyK. M.McGrathG. M. (1995). Perceptions of Ethical Dilemmas. Payneham, Australia: National Police Research Unit.
9.
IvanovićR. (2001). Corruption in the police?Globus, December 14, 2001.
10.
KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2004). Measuring police integrity. In PiqueroA. R.GreeneJ. R.HickmanM. J. (Eds.), Police integrity and ethics. (pp. 1.3–1.20). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaberfeldM. R. (Eds.), (2004). The contours of police integrity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaberfeldM. R. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. New York, NY: Springer.
13.
KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HarverW. E.HaberfeldM. R. (1997). The Measurement of Police Integrity. (Final Report). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs: National Institute of Justice.
14.
KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HarverW. E.HaberfeldM. R. (2000). The measurement of police integrity. Research in brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
Knapp Commission. (1972). The Knapp Commission report on police corruption. New York, NY: Brazilier.
16.
KremerF. (2004). Police integrity in Hungary. In KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaberfeldM. R. (Eds.), The contours of police integrity. (pp. 116–129) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2000). Challenges of policing democracies: The Croatian experience. In DasD.MareninO. (Eds.). Challenges of policing democracies: A world perspective (pp. 45–85). Newark, NJ: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
18.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2003). To serve and collect: Measuring police corruption. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 93, 593–649.
19.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2004a). Distinct and different: Transformation of the croatian police. In CapariniM.MareninO. (Eds.), Transforming police in central and eastern Europe (pp. 195–219). Muenster, Germany: Lit Verlag/ Somerset, NJ: Transaction.
20.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2004b). Evaluating the seriousness of police misconduct: A cross-cultural comparison of police officer and citizen views. International Criminal Justice Review, 14, 25–48.
21.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2005a). Croatia. In HaberfeldM. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement, Volume 3: International. (pp. 1030–1032) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2005b). Fallen Blue Knights: Controlling Police Corruption. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2005c). Police (Mis)behavior: A cross-cultural study of corruption seriousness. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 28, 546–566.
24.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2008). A comparative study of public support for the police. International Criminal Justice Review, 18, 406–434.
25.
Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2009). The croatian police, police integrity, and transition toward democratic policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32, 459–488.
26.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.KlockarsC. B. (1995 November). A cross-cultural study of police corruption. Paper Presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston, MA.
27.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.KlockarsC. B. (1998). The code of silence and the croatian police. In PagonM. (Ed.), Policing in central and eastern Europe: Organizational, managerial, and human resource aspects. (pp. 329–347) Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
28.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.KlockarsC. B. (2000). Comparing police supervisor and line officer opinions about the code of silence: The case of croatia. In PagonM. (Ed.), Policing in central and eastern Europe: Ethics, integrity, and human rights. (pp. 183–195) Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
29.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.KlockarsC. B. (2004). Police integrity in Croatia. In KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaberfeldM. R. (Eds.), The Contours of Police Integrity. (pp. 56–74) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.KlockarsC. B.Cajner-MraovićI.IvanušecD. (2002). Controlling police corruption: The Croatian perspective. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 3, 55–72.
31.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.O’Connor ShelleyT. (2005). The bosnian police and police integrity: A continuing story. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 428–454.
32.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.O’Connor ShelleyT. (2007). Police integrity and the Czech police officers. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31, 21–49.
33.
Kutnjak IvkovićS.O’Connor ShellyT. (2008). The police code of silence and different paths toward democratic policing. Policing and Society, 18, 445–473.
34.
Los Angeles Police Department. (2000). Board of inquiry into the rampart area corruption incident: Executive summary. Retrieved fromhttp://www.lapdonline.org
35.
MareninO.CapariniM. (2005). Reforming the police in central and eastern European states. In FieldsC. B.MooreR. H.Jr (Eds), Comparative and International Criminal Justice: Traditional and Nontraditional Systems of Law and Control. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 217–242.
36.
McConkeyK. M.HuonG. F.FrankM. G. (1996). Practical ethics in the police service. Payneham, Australia: National Police Research Unit.
Mollen Commission. (1994). Commission to investigate allegations of police corruption and the anti-corruption procedures of the police department. The commission report. New York, NY: City of New York.
39.
PagonM.Kutnjak IvkovićS.LobnikarB. (2000). Police integrity and attitudes toward police corruption: A comparison between the police and the public. In PagonM. (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe. (pp. 383–396) Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
40.
PagonM.LobnikarB. (2004). Police integrity in Slovenia. In KlockarsC. B.Kutnjak IvkovićS.HaberfeldM. R. (Eds.), The Contours of Police Integrity. (pp. 212–228) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Pennsylvania Crime Commission. (1974). Report on Police Corruption and the Quality of Law Enforcement in Philadelphia. (Israel Packer, Chair). Philadelphia, USA: Pennsylvania Crime Commission.
42.
Police Law. (Zagreb, Croatia: Narodne novine 129/01, 2001).
43.
SellinT.WolfgangM. E. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York, NY: Wiley.
