Individual-level predictors of erroneous arrest for illegal behavior are investigated using a national level, probability sample. The analysis specifically examines whether being a “usual suspect” based on previous criminal behavior and being male; “guilt by association” based on the illegal behavior of one’s friends; academic achievement; and sociodemographic variables including ethnicity and socioeconomic status, impact the likelihood of being erroneously arrested for a crime. Results suggest that officers may be erroneously arresting minorities and individuals who have low academic achievement. Implications for policy and future research are considered.
BeckerH. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
2.
BachmanJ. G.GreenS.WirtanenI. (1971). Youth in transition: Dropping out: Problem or symptom? (Vol. 3). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
3.
BonjeanC. M.HillR. J.McLemoreS. D. (1967). Sociological measurement: An inventory of scales and indices. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
4.
BosickS. J. (2009). Operationalizing crime over the life course. Crime and Delinquency, 55, 472–496.
5.
BowersJ. (2008). Punishing the innocent. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156, 1117–1179.
6.
BrameR.PaternosterR. (2003). Missing data problems in criminological research: Two case studies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 55–78.
7.
ChevignyP. (1969). Police power: Police abuses in New York City. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
8.
ColeS. (2009). Cultural consequences of miscarriages of justice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 431–449.
9.
CordrayS.PolkK. (1983). The implications of respondent los in panel studies of deviant behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20, 214–242.
10.
CrayE. (1967). The big blue line: Police power vs. human rights. New York, NY: Coward-McCann.
11.
de LeeuwE.de HeerW. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In GrovesR. M.DillmanD. A.EltingeJ. L.LittleR. J. A. (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 41–54). New York, NY: John Wiley.
12.
de LeeuwE. D.van der ZouwenJ. (1988). Data quality in face to face interviews: A comparative meta-analysis. In GrovesR. M.BiemerP. P.LybergL.MasseyJ. T.Nicholls, IIW. L.WaksbergJ. (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 257–282). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
DemboR.WothkeW.SeebergerW.ShemwellM.PachecoK.RollieM.…HartsfieldA. (2002). Testing a longitudinal model of the relationships among high risk youths’ drug sales, drug use, and participation in index crimes. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 11, 36–61.
14.
ElliottD. (1995). Lies, damn lies and arrest statistics: The Sutherland award presentation. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
15.
ElliottD. S.HuizingaD.MenardS. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
16.
FaganJ.DaviesG. (2000). Street stops and broken windows: Terry, race, and disorder in New York City. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28, 457–504.
17.
FisherS. Z. (1993). “Just the facts, ma'am”: Lying and omission of exculpatory evidence in police reports. New England Law Review, 28, 1–62.
18.
GreerC.McLaughlinE. (2011). ‘Trial by media’: Policing, the 24-7 news mediasphere and the ‘politics of outrage’. Theoretical Criminology, 15, 23–46.
19.
GrovesR. M.FowlerF.WileyJ.CouperM. P.LepkowskiJ. M.SingerE.TourangeauR. (2004). Survey methodology. New York, NY: John Wiley.
20.
HardtR. H.Peterson-HardtS. (1977). On determining the quality of the delinquency self-report method. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14, 247–261.
21.
HindelangM. J.HirschiT.WeisJ. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
JangS. J. (1999). Different definitions, different modeling decisions, and different interpretations: A rejoinder to Lauritsen. Criminology, 37, 695–703.
23.
KingJ. (2009). `False positives' report calls drug field tests useless; `Untold thousands of wrongful arrests'. NACDL Champion, 33, 12–17.
24.
KlemkeL.TiedemanG. (1981). Toward an understanding of false accusation: The pure case of deviant labeling. Deviant Behavior, 2, 261–285.
25.
LackeyC. (2003). Violent family heritage, the transition to adulthood, and later partner violence. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 74–98.
26.
LauritsenJ. L. (1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 77, 127–155.
27.
LemertE. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
28.
MawbyR. (1999). Visibility, transparency and police-media relations. Policing and Society, 9, 263–286.
29.
MenardS. (2000). The “normality” of repeat victimization from adolescence through early adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 17, 543–574.
30.
MenardS. (2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
MenardS. (2012). Age, criminal victimization, and offending: Changing relationships from adolescence to middle adulthood. Victims and Offenders, 7, 227–254.
32.
MenardS.ElliottD. S. (1993). Data set comparability and short-term trends in crime and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 433–445.
33.
MenardS.MihalicS.HuizingaD. (2001). Drugs and crime revisited. Justice Quarterly, 18, 269–299.
34.
MenardS.PollockW. (2014). Self-reports of being falsely accused of criminal behavior. Deviant Behavior, 35, 378–373.
35.
MollenM.BaerH.EvansH.LanklerR.TylerH.ArmaoJ.CornfeldL. (1994). The City of New York commission to investigate allegations of police corruption and the anti-corruptions procedures of the police department. New York, NY: Commission Report.
36.
NewcombM. D.BentlerP. M. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
OsgoodD. W.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1989). Time trends and age trends in arrests and self-reported illegal behavior. Criminology, 27, 389–417.
38.
PerrI. (1988). Claims of psychiatric injury after alleged false arrest. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 33, 21–34.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
RichardsonJ. (Ed.). (2002). To serve and protect: A report on policing in Vancouver’s downtown eastside. Vancouver, BC: Pivot Legal Society.
42.
ThornberryT. P. (1989). Panel effects and the use of self-reported measures of delinquency in longitudinal studies. In KleinM. W. (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 347–369). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
