Worldwide, the punishment of law violators takes many forms, with some countries relying heavily on incarceration and others favoring a mix of punishments including incarceration, corporal punishment, and the death penalty. Determining why a nation chooses to implement one sanction over another requires an examination of political factors. While some notable research has examined the correlations between incarceration rates, death penalty retention, and various measures of political power and repression, the influence of political factors on punishment needs a fuller explication. Specifically, the use of corporal punishment as a criminal sanction has not been fully examined within the political repression and punishment literature. To address this gap, authors employ a cross-national comparative approach to examine how repressive governments and failing regimes influence the use of corporal punishment by the formal justice system. Findings reveal that more repressive and failing regimes are more likely to use corporal punishment, compared to freer and more sustainable nations.
AdelmanI.MorrisC. (1965). A factor analysis of the interrelationship between social and political variables and per capita gross national product. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4, 555–578.
2.
AldrichJ.NelsonF. (1984). Linear probability, logit and probit models. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
3.
BatesR. (2008). State failure. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 1–12.
4.
BoxS.HaleC. (1986). Unemployment, crime and imprisonment, and the enduring problem of prison overcrowding. In MatthewsR.YoungJ. (Eds.), Confronting crime (pp. 72–99). London, England: SAGE.
5.
CareyS. (2010). The use of repression as a response to domestic dissent. Political Studies, 58, 167–186.
6.
ChamblissW.MankoffM. (1979). Whose law? What order?: Conflict approach to Criminology. New York: John Wiley.
7.
DahrendorfR. (1965). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8.
DurkheimE. (1900). The Evolution of Punishment. In LukesS.ScullA. (Eds.), Durkheim and the Law (pp. 25–77). New York: St Martin's Press.
9.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish. (trans.) A. Sheridan. London, England: Peregrine Books.
Global Initiative to End all Corporal Punishment of Children. (2008). Global report 2008. Retrieved January 15, 2010, fromhttp://www.endcorporalpunishment.org/
13.
GouldL.PateM. (2010). Discipline, docility and disparity: A study of inequality and corporal punishment. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 185–205.
14.
GreenbergD. (1977). The dynamics of oscillatory punishment processes. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68, 643–651.
15.
GreenbergD.WestV. (2008). Siting the Death Penalty Internationally. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 295–343.
16.
HaleC. (1989). Unemployment, imprisonment, and the stability of punishment hypothesis: Some results using cointegration and error corrections models. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 169–186.
17.
HewittJ.WilkenfeldJ.GurrT. (2010). Peace and conflict. The University of Maryland, The Center for International Development and Conflict Management. College Park.
18.
JacobsD.KlebanR. (2003). Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: A pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 80, 725–755.
19.
JankovicI. (1977). Labour market and imprisonment. Crime and Social Justice, 8, 17–31.
20.
KentS. (2010). Predicting abolition: A cross-national survival analysis of the social and political determinants of death penalty statuses. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 56–72.
21.
KilliasM. (1986). Power concentration, legitimation crisis and penal severity: A comparative perspective. In GrovesW. B.NewmanG. (Eds.), Punishment and privilege (pp . 95–117). New York, NY: Harrow and Heston.
MarshallM.ColeB. (2009). Global report 2009: Conflict, governance, and state fragility. Fairfax, Virginia: GeorgeMason University, Center for Systematic Peace.
24.
MeierL.van de GeerS.BühlmannP. (2008). The group lasso for logistic regression. Royal Journal of Statistics, Series B, 70, 53–71.
25.
MietheT.LuH.DeibertG. (2005). Cross-national variability in capital punishment: Exploring the sociopolitical sources of its differential legal status. International Criminal Justice Review, 15, 115–130.
26.
MelossiD. (2008). Controlling crime, controlling society: Thinking about crime in Europe and America. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press.
27.
NeapolitanJ. (2001). An examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness. International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology, 45, 691–710.
28.
ObozinskiG.TaskerB.JordanM. (2009). Joint covariate selection and joint subspace selection for multiple classification problems. Journal of Statistics and Computing. Retrieved January 21, 2011, http://www.seas.upenn.edu/∼taskar/pubs/sc09.pdf.
29.
PateM.GouldL. (2009). The discipline of difference: Ethnolinguistic heterogeneity and corporal punishment. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA.
30.
PoulantzasN. (2000). State, power socialism. (trans.) Patrick Camiller. London, England: Verso.
31.
QuinneyR. (2000). Bearing witness to crime and social justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
RuddellR. (2005). Social disruption, state priorities, and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 7, 7–28.
33.
RuddellR.UrbinaM. (2004). Minority threat and punishment: A cross-national analysis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 903–931.
34.
RuddellR.UrbinaM. (2007). Weak nations, political repression, and punishment. International Criminal Justice Review, 17, 84–107.
35.
SmithK. (2004). The politics of punishment: Evaluating political explanations of incarceration rates. The Journal of Politics, 66, 925–938.
