In this study, the authors explored the link between deviant youth group (DYG) membership and antisocial behavior through a large student survey conducted by means of the same questionnaire in 62 cities in 30 countries. The sample (N = 40,678) was made up of 7th-, 8th-, and 9th-grade students, both boys and girls, attending different types of schools. The definition of DYG that the authors used was the one drawn up by the Eurogang network: “Any durable, street-oriented youth group whose own identity includes involvement in illegal activity.” About 4.4% of youths were considered as DYG members according to this definition, with prevalence rates differing markedly among different countries, from less than 1% to more than 16%. In general, DYG membership implied a higher prevalence of delinquency, violence, and alcohol and drug use. Differences between DYG members and nonmembers were greater with regard to more serious antisocial behavior. Although the prevalence of DYG membership varies in different countries, the association between DYG membership and antisocial behavior is quite similar in the different national contexts.
AebiM. (2009). Enquêtes de délinquance autoreportée en Europe [Assessing deviance, crime and prevention in Europe]. Flémal: Communauté Européenne sur les presses de l’imprimerie.
2.
Battin-PearsonS. R.ThornberryT. P.HawkinsJ. D.KrohnM. D. (1998, October). Gang membership, delinquent peers, and delinquent behavior. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
3.
BjerregaardB. (2010). Gang membership and drug involvement: Untangling the complex relationship. Crime Delinquency, 56, 3–34.
4.
BjerregaardB.SmithC. (1993). Gender differences in gang participation, delinquency, and substance use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 329–355.
5.
CoveyR. (2010). Street gangs throughout the world. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
CurryG. D.DeckerS. H.EgleyA.Jr (2002). Gang involvement and delinquency in a middle school population. Justice Quarterly, 19, 275–292.
7.
DeckerS. H.WeermanF. M. (2005). European street gangs and troublesome youth groups. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
8.
EnzmannD.MarshallI. H.KilliasM.Junger-TasJ.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. (2010). Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police and victimization data. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 159–183.
9.
EsbensenF. A.HuizingaD. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565–589.
10.
EsbensenF. A.WinfreeL. T.HeN.TaylorT. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter?. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 105–130.
11.
GattiU.TremblayR. E.VitaroF.McDuffP. (2005). Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: A test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1178–1190.
12.
GordonR. A.LaheyB. B.KawaiE.LoeberR.Stouthamer-LoeberM.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Antisocial behavior and youth gang membership: Selection and socialization. Criminology, 42, 55–88.
13.
HaymozS. (2010). Les gangs en Suisse: délinquance, victimisation et facteurs de risques. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Lausanne: Lausanne.
14.
HowellJ. C.DeckerS. H. (1999, January). The youth gangs, drugs, and violence connection. U.S. Department of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington, DC: USA.
15.
HuizingaD.SchumannK. F. (2001). Gang membership in Bremen and Denver: Comparative longitudinal data. In KleinM. W.KernerH.-J.MaxsonC. L.WeitekampE. G. M. (Eds.), The Eurogang paradox (pp. 231–246). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16.
HuntG.Joe-LaidlerK. (2001). Situations of violence in the lives of girl gang members. Health Care for Women International, 22, 363–384.
17.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczyńskaB. (Eds.), (2010). Juvenile delinquency in Europe and beyond: Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD2). Berlin: Springer.
18.
KilliasM. (1989). Les Suisses face au crime: Leurs expériences et attitudes à la lumière des sondages suisses de victimisation. Grüsch: Rüegger.
19.
KleinM. W.KernerH.-J.MaxsonC. L.WeitekampE. G. M. (2001). The Eurogang paradox. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
20.
KleinM. W.MaxsonC. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
LienI.-L. (2005). Criminal gangs and their connections. In DeckerS. H.WeermanF. M. (Eds.), European street gangs and troublesome youth groups (pp. 31–50). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
22.
LuciaS.HerrmannL.KilliasM. (2007). How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of Internet vs. paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 39–64.
23.
Saint-ArnaudS.BernardP. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51, 499–527.
24.
SalagaevA.ShashkinA.SherbakovaI.TouriyanskyE. (2005). Contemporary Russian gangs: History, membership, and crime involvement. In DeckerS. H.WeermanF. M. (Eds.), European street gangs and troublesome youth groups (pp. 169–191). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
25.
SharpC.AldridgeJ.MedinaJ. (2006). Delinquent youth groups and offending behaviour: Findings from the 2004 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey. London, England: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
26.
SwahnM. H.BossarteR. M.WestB.TopalliV. (2010). Alcohol and drug use among gang members: Experiences of adolescents who attend school. Journal of School Health, 80, 353–360.
27.
ThornberryT. PKrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SmithC. A.TobinK. (2002). The toll of gang membership: Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Van GemertF.PetersonD.LienI.-L. (2008). Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. Portland, OR: Willan.
29.
WebbV. J.KatzC. M.DeckerS. H. (2006). Assessing the validity of self-reports by gang members: Results from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 232–252.
30.
WeermanF. M.EsbensenF.-A. (2005). A cross-national comparison of youth gangs. In DeckerS. H.WeermanF. M. (Eds.), European street gangs and troublesome youth groups (pp. 219–255). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
