The purpose of this descriptive phenomenological study was to examine the co-teaching experiences of secondary choir teachers in associate director positions in the state of Texas. We interviewed 12 participants, who had held an associate director position for at least 3 years, two times across a 4-month period. Three themes emerged from the data: personal compatibility with head director, context for mentoring and learning, and hierarchical structures. The most satisfied associate directors had a positive relationship with their head director colleague, felt that their input was valued, and collaborated as part of a team. They desired to learn and receive mentorship from their colleague, though that mentorship was facilitated or impeded by context. Hierarchical structures were pervasive and affected job roles, associate directors’ sense of agency, and the choirs they taught.
ConwayC. M. (Ed.). (2003). Great beginnings for music teachers: Mentoring and supporting new music teachers. MENC.
6.
ConwayC. M.SmithM. V.HodgmanT. M. (2010). Handbook for the music mentor. GIA.
7.
CookL.FriendM. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16.
8.
CreswellJ.PothC. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
9.
DravesT. J. (2010). Fostering and sustaining music teacher identity in the student teaching experience. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Issues of identity in music education: Narratives and practices (pp. 15–35). Information Age.
EmburyD. C. (2010). Does co-teaching work? A mixed method case study evaluation of co- teaching as an intervention (Publication No. 3419957) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
12.
FriendM.CookL. (2007). Interaction: Collaboration skills for school professionals (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
13.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChambersD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380
HusserlE. (1967). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. George Allen & Unwin.
16.
JangS.-J. (2006). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732272
17.
JenkinsL. E.CrawfordR. (2016). The impact of blended learning and team teaching in tertiary pre-service music education classes. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(3), 5. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.3.5
18.
JonesF.HarrisS. (2012). Benefits and drawbacks of using multiple instructors to teach single courses. College Teaching, 60(4), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.654832
19.
Kohler-EvansP. A. (2006). Co-teaching: How to make this marriage work in front of the kids. Education, 127(2), 260–264.
20.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
21.
MorelockJ. R.LesterM. M.KlopherM. D.JardonA. M.MullinsR. D.NicholasE. L.AlfaydiA. S. (2017). Power, perceptions, and relationships: A model of co-teaching in higher education. College Teaching, 65(4), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1336610
22.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
23.
MurawskiW. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500455703
24.
MurawskiW. W.LochnerW. W. (2011). Observing co-teaching: What to ask for, look for, and listen for. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451210378
25.
NápolesJ.KelleyJ. F.RinnT. R. (2022). Burnout and perceived agency among Texas choir teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 71, 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221126889
26.
NevinA. I.ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators–what does the research say?Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009
27.
ParkerA.AllenD.McHattonP. A.RosaL. (2010). Dance lessons: Preparing preservice teachers for coteaching partnerships. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463540
28.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
29.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). Plenum Press.
ReaP.McLaughlinV. L.Walther-ThomasC. S. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 682(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402902068002
32.
RiceD.ZigmondN. (2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of developments in Australian and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 15(4), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1504_3
33.
RytivaaraA.PulkkinenJ.deBruinC. L. (2019). Committing, engaging and negotiating: Teachers’ stories about creating shared spaces for co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.013
34.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
35.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Council for Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300
SipeE. A. (2019). Co-teaching: An interview-based study of the perceptions of secondary co- teachers (Publication No. 22622765) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
38.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
39.
van ManenM. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
40.
WhiteC. S.HenleyJ. A.BrabstonM. E. (1998). To team teach or not to team teach–that is the question, a faculty perspective. Marketing Education Review, 8(3), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.1998.11488640
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
