We investigated whether camera placement affects peer teachers’ focus of attention during reflection. Preservice music teachers (N = 14) reflected on peer teaching videos that had been recorded simultaneously from a head-mounted camera and a tripod-mounted camera at the back of the classroom. Participants completed the teaching reflection cycle twice, providing their observation comments in response to open-ended prompts. Responses were coded, with a single sentence as the unit of analysis, and a three-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference in comment frequencies according to comment type (student-focused or teacher-focused) but not according to camera placement or trial. Our results corroborate previous research indicating that undergraduate peer teachers focus more on themselves than on their peers, and suggest that placing the camera in a position that shows the students, rather than the teacher, does not seem to affect this tendency. We discuss the implications for peer teaching experiences in teacher education courses.
AnkneyK. L. (2014). Master jazz teachers’ noticing and responses to students during improvisation activities [Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
2.
BaughmanM.BaumgartnerC. M. (2018). Preservice teachers’ experiences teaching an adult community music ensemble. International Journal of Music Education, 36(4), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418775128
3.
BautistaA.WongJ.Cabedo-MasA. (2019). Music teachers’ perspectives on live and video-mediated peer observation as forms of professional development. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(3), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083718819504
4.
BergM. H.MikszaP. (2010). An investigation of preservice music teacher development and concerns. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710363237
5.
BergM. H.RickelsD. A. (2018). Mentoring for mentors: The Music Mentor Plus program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717720634
6.
BorgerdingL.SadlerT.KorolyM. (2013). Teachers’ concerns about biotechnology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z
7.
BryanL. A.RecessoA. (2006). Promoting reflection with a web-based video analysis tool. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 31–39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ876916
8.
ConwayC. (2012). Ten years later: Teachers reflect on perceptions of beginning teachers, their mentors, and administrator regarding preservice music teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412453601
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE.
10.
DiazF. M.SilveiraJ. M.StrandK. (2020). A neurophenomenological investigation of mindfulness among collegiate musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420921184
11.
DukeR. A.PrickettC. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345166
12.
FullerF. F.BownO. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In RyanK. (Ed.), Teacher education, Part II: The 74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 25–52). University of Chicago Press.
13.
GoodnoughK.FalkenbergT.MacDonaldR. (2016). Examining the nature of theory–practice relationships in initial teacher education: A Canadian case study. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 39(1), 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.39.1.05
JuchniewiczJ. (2014). An examination of social intelligence development in preservice music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713475628
16.
KillianJ. N.DyeK. G.WaymanJ. B. (2013). Music student teachers: Pre–student teaching concerns and post–student teaching perceptions over a 5-year period. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412474314
17.
KillianJ. N.LiuJ. (2018). Effect of focused observation on preservice music teachers’ mention of students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, (216), 31–48. http://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.216.0031
18.
MadsenC. K.KaiserK. A. (1999). Pre-internship fears of student teaching. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(2), 27–32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ608921
19.
McFaddenJ.EllisJ.AnwarT.RoehrigG. (2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of a digital video annotation tool to promote reflective practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2
20.
MikszaP.BergM. H. (2013). A longitudinal study of preservice music teacher development: Application and advancement of the Fuller and Bown teacher-concerns model. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412473606
21.
NapolesJ. (2008). Relationships among instructor, peer, and self-evaluations of undergraduate music education majors’ micro-teaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323071
22.
NápolesJ.Vázquez-RamosA. (2013). Perceptions of time spent in teacher talk: A comparison among self-estimates, peer estimates, and actual time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(4), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412463246
23.
NeillS. L. (2016). Effects of peer and self-evaluations on pre-service teaching experiences. International Journal of Music and Performing Arts, 4(2), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijmpa.v4n2a3
24.
PaneyA. S.BuonviriN. O. (2014). Teaching melodic dictation in advanced placement music theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508411
25.
ParkerE. C.BondV. L.PowellS. R. (2017). A grounded theory of preservice music educators’ lesson planning processes within field experience methods courses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417730035
26.
PaulS. (1998). The effects of peer teaching experiences on professional teacher role development of undergraduate instrumental music education majors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 137, 73–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318933
27.
PaulS.TeachoutD.SullivanJ.KellyS.BauerW.RaiberM. (2001). Authentic-context learning activities in instrumental music teacher education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345865
28.
PowellS. R. (2011). Examining preservice music teachers’ perceptions of initial peer- and field-teaching experiences. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710386751
29.
PowellS. R. (2014). Examining preservice music teacher concerns in peer- and field-teaching settings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508408
30.
PowellS. R. (2016). The influence of video reflection on preservice music teachers’ concerns in peer- and field-teaching settings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022429415620619
31.
SimsW. (1986). The effect of high versus low teacher affect and passive versus active student activity during music listening on preschool children’s attention, piece preference, time spent listening, and piece recognition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344747
SpringerD. G.YingerO. S. (2019). Linguistic indicators of reflective practice among music education majors. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083718786739
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
