The purpose of this study was to determine what impact an authentic assessment tool (i.e., a processfolio) would have on our music education Master of Arts in Teaching degree program. We conducted a case study at our university with the music education Master of Arts in Teaching student cohort to detail the development and initial implementation of the processfolio as a means of reflection in preservice music teachers. Data included participant observation, individual and collaborative note taking, written artifacts from students and faculty, audio/video recordings, and semistructured interviews. Findings indicated (a) processfolios became a lens through which students focused their growth as reflective teachers; (b) a lack of examples and confusion over specific processfolio requirements was stress inducing; (c) the collaborative nature of working within a peer/faculty cohort was socially, emotionally, and academically valuable; (d) students effectively used the processfolio to demonstrate synthesis of the multiple facets of the graduate music education program.
BarrettJ. R. (2002). Teaching for understanding in music teacher education. In BoardmanE. (Ed.), Dimensions of musical learning and teaching (pp. 217–234). Reston, VA: MENC.
2.
BauerW. I.DunnR. E. (2003). The electronic portfolio in music teacher education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13, 7–20. doi:10.1177/10570837030130010103
3.
BergM. H.LindV. R. (2003). Preservice music teacher electronic portfolio integrating reflection and technology. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 12, 18–28. doi:10.1177/10570837030120020104
4.
BerrillD. P.AddisonE. (2010). Repertoires of practice: Re-framing teaching portfolios. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1178–1185. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.005
BreaultR. A. (2004). Dissonant themes in preservice portfolio development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 847–859. doi:10.1016/j.tate2004.09.006
7.
CampbellM. R.BrummettV. M. (2002). Professional teaching portfolios: For pros and preservice teachers alike. Music Educators Journal, 89(2), 25–57. doi:10.2307/3399838
8.
ÇimerS. O. (2011). The effect of portfolios on students’ learning: Student teachers’ views. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 161–176. doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.552183
9.
DavisE. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
10.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
11.
EvansS.DanielT.MikovchA.MetzeL.AntonyN. (2006). The use of technology in portfolio assessment of teacher education candidates. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 5–27.
12.
HenninkM.HutterI.BaileyA. (2011). Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
HillC. F. (2008). A portfolio model for music educators. Music Educators Journal, 95(1), 61–72. doi:10.1177/0027432108318481
14.
ImhofM.PicardC. (2009). Views on using portfolio in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 149–154. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.001
15.
JayJ. K.JohnsonK. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73–85. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
16.
KerchnerJ. L. (1997). Portfolio assessment: Tracking development. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 6, 19–22. doi:10.1177/105708379700600207
17.
KleinfeldJ. (1992). Learning to think like a teacher: The study of cases. In ShulmanJ. H. (Ed.), Case methods in education (pp. 33–49). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
LynchL. L.PurnawarmanP. (2004). Electronic portfolio assessments in U.S. educational and instructional technology programs: Are they supporting teacher education?Tech Trends, 48, 50–56.
20.
LyonsN. (1998). With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
McColganK.BlackwoodB. (2009). A systematic review protocol on the use of teaching portfolios for educators in further and higher education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 2500–2507. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05189.x
22.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
MitchellB. (1997). Using portfolios in undergraduate music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 7, 23–27. doi:10.1177/105708379700700105
24.
ParkesK. A.PowellS. R. (2015). Is the edTPA the right choice for evaluating teacher readiness?Arts Education Policy Review, 116, 103–113. doi:10.1080/10632913.2014.944964
25.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
PaulsonF. L.PaulsonP. R.MeyerC. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio?Educational Leadership, 48, 60–63.
27.
RichardsonC. P. (1995). Portfolio assessment at the master’s level. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 4, 14–21. doi:10.1177/105708379500400204
28.
RobinsonM. (1995). Alternative assessment techniques for teachers. Music Educators Journal, 81(5), 28–34. doi:10.2307/3398853
29.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
SilveiraJ. M. (2013). Portfolios and assessment in music classes. Music Educators Journal, 99(3), 15–24. doi:10.1177/0027432112470071
