Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Case study techniques were used to investigate perceptions of undergraduate music majors participating as teacher/mentors for elementary students in a university sponsored music composition program. Data included teacher interviews and observation of teacher training and composition mentoring sessions. Teacher perceptions were categorized as challenges and benefits for the young composers they worked with and for themselves as mentors in the program. Benefits to young composers were identified as social development, pride in accomplishment, and promotion of musical learning. Challenges to young composers were perceived as: expression of musical ideas and concern with finding “correct” ideas. Personal challenges for teachers were time commitment and encouraging students without influencing their ideas. Teachers cited benefits of participation as: teaching experience, understanding compositional process, improved composer identity, and appreciation for composer intent. Teachers envisioned possibilities for composition instruction in their future teaching situations. Implications for improving composition training for preservice teachers are discussed.

Keywords

mentoring music composition music teacher preparation preservice teachers service learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bamberger

(2003). The development of intuitive musical understanding: A natural experiment. Psychology of Music, 31, 7–36.

Barrett

(2006). ‘Creative collaboration’: An ‘eminence’ study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychology of Music, 34, 195–218.

Barrett

M. S.

(2003). Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In Hickey

(Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 3–27). Reston, VA: MENC.

Burnard

Younker

(2002). Mapping pathways: Fostering creativity in musical composition. Music Education Research, 47, 60–74.

Burton

Reynolds

(2009). Transforming teacher education through service-learning. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 18(2), 18–33.

Green

(2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Farnham, England: Ashgate.

Hargreaves

D. J.

Miell

MacDonald

R. A. R.

(2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In MacDonald

Hargreaves

Miell

(Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 1–20). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Hewitt

(2002). A comparative analysis of process and product with specialist and generalist pre-service teachers involved in a group activity. Music Education Research, 4, 25–36.

Hickey

(2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234–244.

10.

Hickey

(2012). Music outside the lines: Ideas for composing in K-12 music classrooms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

11.

Kaschub

(2013). Advancing composition in music education through strategic professional development. In Kaschub

Smith

J. P.

(Eds.), Composing our future: Preparing music educators to teach composition (pp. 319–337). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

12.

Kennedy

M. A.

(2002). Listening to the music: Compositional processes of high school composers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 94–110.

13.

Lupton

Bruce

(2010). Craft, process and art: Teaching and learning music composition in higher education. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 271–287.

14.

Menard

(2009). An investigation of creative potential in high school musicians: Recognizing, promoting, and assessing creative ability through music composition. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-10252009-141849/unrestricted/Menard_diss.pdf

15.

Odena

Welch

G. F.

(2007). The influence of teachers’ backgrounds on their perceptions of musical creativity: A qualitative study with secondary school music teachers. Research Studies in Music Education, 28(1), 71–81.

16.

Smith

J. P.

(2008). Compositions of elementary recorder students created under various conditions of task structure. Research Studies in Music Education, 30(2), 159–176.

17.

Stauffer

S. L.

(2002). Connections between the musical and life experiences of young composers and their compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 301–322.

18.

Strand

(2006). Survey of Indiana music teachers on using composition in the classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 154–167.

19.

Webster

P. R.

(2013). Music composition intelligence and creative thinking in music. In Kaschub

J. P.

Smith

(Eds.), Composing our future: Preparing music educators to teach music composition (pp. 19–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

20.

Wiggins

(2007). Compositional process in music. In Bresler

(Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (Vol. 16, pp. 453–469). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

21.

Woodford

P. G.

(2002). The social construction of music teacher identity in undergraduate music education majors. In Colwell

Richardson

(Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 674–695). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

22.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.57 MB

0.03 MB

Preservice Music Teacher Perceptions of Mentoring Young Composers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material