Influence of hydrothermal fatigue on mechanical properties and damage mechanisms of hemp-reinforced biocomposites and comparison with glass-reinforced composites
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2025
Influence of hydrothermal fatigue on mechanical properties and damage mechanisms of hemp-reinforced biocomposites and comparison with glass-reinforced composites
The aim of this work was to evaluate the tensile properties and the damage mechanisms of hemp and glass-reinforced composites when they were subjected to hydrothermal fatigue. Each wet/dry cycle consisted in immersing samples in water at 60°C during 12 days and drying them in an oven at 40°C during 2 days. Three different matrices (Epolam, Greenpoxy and Elium) were studied with two reinforcement orientations (±45° and 0°/90°). Gravimetric measurements were performed during 30 wet/dry cycles to determine the evolution of the parameters of the Fick diffusion model. Repeated progressive tensile loading tests instrumented with an acoustic emission setup were also carried out. Damage was investigated by means of SEM and micro-CT. Results showed that hydrothermal fatigue affects significantly the tensile properties of all the composites studied. Hemp/Greenpoxy appears to better resist to hydrothermal fatigue while the hemp/Elium behavior is more impacted. Moreover, contrary to what might be expected, glass/Epolam samples are not the least sensitive to hydrothermal fatigue.
AbdollahiparsaHShahmirzalooATeuffelP, et al. (2023)
A review of recent developments in structural applications of natural fiber-reinforced composites (NFRCs). Composites and Advanced Materials32: 263498332211475.
2.
AlbouyWVieilleBTalebL (2014)
Influence of matrix ductility on the high-temperature fatigue behaviour of quasi-isotropic woven-ply thermoplastic and thermoset laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing67: 22–36.
3.
AllaguiSEl MahiARebiereJ-L, et al. (2021)
Effect of recycling cycles on the mechanical and damping properties of flax fiber reinforced elium composite: Experimental and numerical studies. Journal of Renewable Materials9(4): 695–721.
4.
BarbièreRTouchardFChocinski-ArnaultL, et al. (2020)
Influence of moisture and drying on fatigue damage mechanisms in a woven hemp/epoxy composite: Acoustic emission and micro-CT analysis. International Journal of Fatigue136: 105593.
5.
Barnat-HunekDSmarzewskiPBrzyskiP (2017)
Properties of hemp–flax composites for use in the building industry. Journal of Natural Fibers14(3): 410–425.
6.
BorrelloMMeleMCampanaG, et al. (2020)
Manufacturing and characterization of hemp‐reinforced epoxy composites. Polymer Composites41(6): 2316–2329.
7.
CaduTVan SchoorsLSicotO, et al. (2019)
Cyclic hygrothermal ageing of flax fibers’ bundles and unidirectional flax/epoxy composite. Are bio-based reinforced composites so sensitive?Industrial Crops and Products141: 111730.
8.
ChilaliAZouariWAssararM, et al. (2018)
Effect of water ageing on the load-unload cyclic behaviour of flax fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting composites. Composite Structures183: 309–319.
9.
de VasconcellosD STouchardFChocinski-ArnaultL (2014)
Tension–tension fatigue behaviour of woven hemp fiber reinforced epoxy composite: a multi-instrumented damage analysis. International Journal of Fatigue59: 159–169.
10.
DhakalHGhasemnejadHZhangZ, et al. (2019)
The post-impact response of flax/up composite laminates under low velocity impact loading. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(2): 183–199.
11.
DrouhetQTouchardFChocinski-ArnaultL (2022)
Influence of hygrothermal aging on mechanical properties and damage mechanisms of Hemp-Reinforced biocomposites. Journal of Natural Fibers19(17): 15404–15421.
12.
DrouhetQTouchardFChocinski-ArnaultL (2023)
Tensile behavior of [0/90]7 hemp/elium biocomposites after water aging: in-Situ Micro-CT testing and numerical analysis. Micro3(2): 496–509.
13.
FreundL (2018) Etude du vieillissement hygrothermique des composites renforcés de fibers naturelles: Approche expérimentale et modélisation [Thèse de doctorat]. Université de Lorraine.
14.
GraupnerNWeberD EBellE G, et al. (2022)
Hemp from disordered lines for new staple fiber yarns and high-performance composite applications. Frontiers in Materials8: 807004.
15.
HorneM R L (2012) Bast fibers: Hemp cultivation and production. In: Kozłowski RM and Machiewicz-Talarczyk M (eds) Handbook of Natural Fibers. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 114–145.
KesentiniZEl MahiARebiereJ L, et al. (2022)
Static and fatigue tensile behavior and damage mechanisms analysis in aged flax fiber/PLA composite. International Journal of Applied Mechanics14(8): 2250080.
19.
KhaliliPBlinzlerBKádárR, et al. (2020)
Ramie fabric elium® composites with flame retardant coating: Flammability, smoke, viscoelastic and mechanical properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing137: 105986.
20.
KimHSeoD (2006)
Effect of water absorption fatigue on mechanical properties of sisal textile-reinforced composites. International Journal of Fatigue28(10): 1307–1314.
21.
KrishnasamyPRajamuruganGAravindrajS, et al. (2020)
Vibration and wear characteristics of aloevera/flax/hemp woven fiber epoxy composite reinforced with wire mesh and BaSO4. Journal of Natural Fibers19(8): 2885–2901.
22.
MakKFamA (2020)
The effect of wet-dry cycles on tensile properties of unidirectional flax fiber reinforced polymers. Composites Part B: Engineering183: 107645.
23.
MalloumAMahiA EIdrissM (2019)
The effects of water ageing on the tensile static and fatigue behaviors of greenpoxy–flax fiber composites. Journal of Composite Materials53(21): 2927–2939.
24.
MarrotLAlaoP FMikliV, et al. (2021)
Properties of frost-retted hemp fibers for the reinforcement of composites. Journal of Natural Fibers19(17): 16017–16028.
25.
MaslindaA BAbdul MajidM SRidzuanM J M, et al. (2017)
Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hybrid interwoven cellulosic-cellulosic fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Composite Structures167: 227–237.
26.
MathijsenD (2020)
Innovative bio-composite bicycle swing bridge “ritsumasyl” in The Netherlands shows why the industry should embrace bio-based composites. Reinforced Plastics64(4): 212–217.
27.
MokhtariAOuld OualiMTala-IghilN (2015)
Damage modelling in thermoplastic composites reinforced with natural fibers under compressive loading. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(8): 1239–1260.
28.
NevesA C CRohenL AMantovaniD P, et al. (2020)
Comparative mechanical properties between biocomposites of epoxy and polyester matrices reinforced by hemp fiber. Journal of Materials Research and Technology9(2): 1296–1304.
29.
NewmanR H (2009)
Auto-accelerative water damage in an epoxy composite reinforced with plain-weave flax fabric. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing40(10): 1615–1620.
30.
NewmanR HThummAClaussE C, et al. (2007)
Improving hygrothermal performance in epoxy-biofiber composites. Advanced Materials Research29–30: 287–290.
31.
PapaIFormisanoALoprestoV, et al. (2020)
Water ageing effects on the mechanical properties of flax fiber fabric/polypropylene composite laminates. Journal of Composite Materials54(24): 3481–3489.
32.
PerrierATouchardFChocinski-ArnaultL, et al. (2017)
Quantitative analysis by micro-CT of damage during tensile test in a woven hemp/epoxy composite after water ageing. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing102: 18–27.
33.
PilLBensadounFParisetJ, et al. (2015)
Why are designers fascinated by flax and hemp fibre composites?Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing83: 193–205.
34.
SalaBGabrionXTrivaudeyF, et al. (2021)
Influence of the stress level and hygrothermal conditions on the creep/recovery behaviour of high-grade flax and hemp fiber reinforced GreenPoxy matrix composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing141: 106204.
ScarponiCSantulliCSarasiniF, et al. (2017)
Green composites for aircraft interior panels. International Journal of Sustainable Aviation3(3): 252–270.
37.
ShahD U (2016)
Damage in biocomposites: Stiffness evolution of aligned plant fiber composites during monotonic and cyclic fatigue loading. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing83: 160–168.
38.
ShenC-HSpringerG S (1976)
Moisture absorption and desorption of composite materials. Journal of Composite Materials10(1): 2–20.
39.
SodokeF KToubalLLaperrièreL (2019)
Wetting/drying cyclic effects on mechanical and physicochemical properties of quasi-isotropic flax/epoxy composites. Polymer Degradation and Stability161: 121–130.
40.
TsenoglouC JPavlidouSPapaspyridesC D (2006)
Evaluation of interfacial relaxation due to water absorption in fiber–polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology66(15): 2855–2864.
41.
Van SchoorsLCaduTMoscardelliS, et al. (2021)
Why cyclic hygrothermal ageing modifies the transverse mechanical properties of a unidirectional epoxy-flax fibres composite?Industrial Crops and Products164: 113341.
YangGParkMParkS-J (2019)
Recent progresses of fabrication and characterisation of fibers-reinforced composites: a review. Composites Communications14: 34–42.
44.
ZwawiM (2021)
A review on natural fiber bio-composites, surface modifications and applications. Molecules26(2): 404.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
