For plain concrete materials, the degradation of concrete by seawater is mainly reflected in the corrosion of sulfate ions. In this study, the variation in the flexural strength of concrete specimens with different water-cement ratios under different sulfate concentrations for 470 days is explored, and the effect of sulfate environment on the decay of flexural strength of concrete with corrosion time is experimentally examined. The results show that the evolution of flexural strength can be divided into three stages: strength attenuation stage, strength recovering stage and strength re-attenuation stage. According to the experimental results, the mechanism of strength attenuation, rebound and re-attenuation is established. Combining the chemical reaction rate equations of continued hydration, delayed growth of ettringite and growth of hydroxy-AFm, a new model for the flexural strength degradation of concrete under sulfate corrosion is proposed. Further, the influence of water-cement ratio and corrosive sulfate solution concentration on the flexural strength of concrete is analyzed. Since the ability of concrete to resist sulfate corrosion can be different for different corrosion systems, a unified method is proposed for evaluating the sulfate corrosion resistance of concrete.
AndrésECarlosMIgnacioC (2011)
Chemo-mechanical analysis of concrete cracking and degradation due to external sulfate attack: A meso-scale model. Cement and Concrete Composites33(3): 411–423.
2.
BaryB (2010)
Simplified coupled chemo‐mechanical modeling of cement pastes behavior subjected to combined leaching and external sulfate attack. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics32(14): 1791–1816.
3.
BasistaMWeglewskiW (2008)
Micromechanical modeling of sulphate corrosion in concrete: Influence of ettringite forming reaction. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics35(1–3): 29–52.
4.
BasistaMWeglewskiW (2009)
Chemically assisted damage of concrete: a model of expansion under external sulfate attack. International Journal of Damage Mechanics18(2): 155–175.
5.
BragançaM OGPPortellaK FBonatoM M, et al. (2014)
Electrochemical impedance behavior of mortar subjected to a sulfate environment – a comparison with chloride exposure models. Construction and Building Materials68: 650–658.
6.
BrünigMMichalskiA (2020)
Numerical analysis of damage and failure behavior of concrete. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(4): 570–590.
7.
ChenJKQianCSongH (2016)
A new chemo-mechanical model of damage in concrete under sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials115: 536–543.
8.
ChenKYWuDZXiaLL, et al. (2021)
Geopolymer concrete durability subjected to aggressive environments – A review of influence factors and comparison with ordinary Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials279: 122496.
9.
ComiC and Umberto Department of Structural Engineering (2011)
Anisotropic damage model for concrete affected by alkali-aggregate reaction. International Journal of Damage Mechanics20(4): 598–617.
10.
DaBYuHFMaHY, et al. (2016)
Chloride diffusion study of coral concrete in a marine environment. Construction and Building Materials123: 47–58.
11.
DaBYuHFMaHY, et al. (2016)
Experimental investigation of whole stress-strain curves of coral concrete. Construction and Building Materials122: 81–89.
12.
El-HachemRRozièreEGrondinF, et al. (2011)
New procedure to investigate external sulphate attack on cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Composites34(3): 357–364.
13.
FloreaMVABrouwersHJH (2012)
Chloride binding related to hydration products: Part I: Ordinary Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research42(2): 282–290.
14.
GenovésVSorianoLBorracheroMV, et al. (2015)
Preliminary study on short-term sulphate attack evaluation by non-linear impact resonance acoustic spectroscopy technique. Construction and Building Materials78: 295–302.
15.
HeZWangLShaoYX, et al. (2011)
Effect of decalcification on C-S-H gel microstructure in cement paste. Journal of Building Materials14(03): 293–298.
16.
IkumiTCavalaroSHPSeguraI, et al. (2014)
Alternative methodology to consider damage and expansions in external sulfate attack modeling. Cement and Concrete Research63: 105–116.
17.
JohannesHAnyaV (2019)
Tensile strength of concrete exposed to sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Research116: 81–88.
18.
LangLPanYBoZ, et al. (2021)
Study on hydration reaction and structure evolution of cemented paste backfill in early-age based on resistivity and hydration heat. Construction and Building Materials272(1): 121827.
19.
LiaoKXZhangYPZhangWP, et al. (2020)
Modeling constitutive relationship of sulfate-attacked concrete. Construction and Building Materials260: 119902.
20.
LothenbachBBaryBBescopPL, et al. (2010)
Sulfate ingress in Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research40(8): 1211–1225.
21.
LuCSDanzerRFischerFD (2010)
Influence of threshold stress on the estimation of the Weibull statistics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society85(6): 1640–1642.
22.
LuoYZhouSWangC, et al. (2019)
Effects of cations in sulfate on the thaumasite form of sulfate attack of cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials229: 116865.
23.
MurilloJSRMohamedAHodoW, et al. (2016)
Computational modeling of shear deformation and failure of nanoscale hydrated calcium silicate hydrate in cement paste: Calcium silicate hydrate jennite. International Journal of Damage Mechanics25(1): 98–114.
24.
OuaarADoghriIDelannayL, et al. (2007)
Micromechanics of the deformation and damage of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. International Journal of Damage Mechanics16(2): 227–260.
25.
OuyangWYChenJKJiangMQ (2014)
Evolution of surface hardness of concrete under sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials53: 419–424.
26.
PathirageMBousikhaneFD’AmbrosiaM, et al. (2019)
Effect of alkali silica reaction on the mechanical properties of aging mortar bars: Experiments and numerical modeling. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(2): 291–322.
27.
RamezanianpourAAPourkhorshidiARSobhaniJ, et al. (2021)
Durability of concrete containing blended cements in harsh marine environments: 18 Years exposure study. Construction and Building Materials299: 123863.
28.
Raphaë TixierlMobasherB (2003)
Modeling of damage in Cement-Based materials subjected to external sulfate attack. I: Formulation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering15(4): 305–313.
29.
RomainDJuhyukMYeonungJ, et al. (2021)
Normal and anomalous self-healing mechanism of crystalline calcium silicate hydrates. Cement and Concrete Research142: 106356.
30.
SamsonEMarchandJSnyderKA, et al. (2004)
Modeling ion and fluid transport in unsaturated cement systems in isothermal conditions. Cement and Concrete Research35(1): 141–153.
31.
SanthanamMCohenMDOlekJ (2001)
Sulfate attack research – Whither now?Cement and Concrete Research31(6): 845–851.
32.
SarkarSMahadevanSMeeussenJCL, et al. (2010)
Numerical simulation of cementitious materials degradation under external sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Composites32(3): 241–252.
33.
ShazaliM ABaluchM HAl-GadhibA H (2006)
Predicting residual strength in unsaturated concrete exposed to sulfate attack. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering18(3): 343–354.
34.
SongHYaoJWLuoYM, et al. (2021)
A chemical-mechanics model for the mechanics deterioration of pervious concrete subjected to sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials312: 125383.
35.
StephanDDikoundouSNRaudaschl-SieberG (2008)
Hydration characteristics and hydration products of tricalcium silicate doped with a combination of MgO, Al2O3 and Fe2O3. Thermochimica Acta472(1–2): 64–73.
36.
SunCChenJKZhuJ, et al. (2013)
A new diffusion model of sulfate ions in concrete. Construction and Building Materials39: 39–45.
37.
SuryavanshiAKScantleburyJDLyonSB (1996)
Mechanism of friedel's salt formation in cements rich in tri-calcium aluminate. Cement and Concrete Research26(5): 717–727.
38.
TangSWYaoYAndradeC, et al. (2015)
Recent durability studies on concrete structure. Cement and Concrete Research78: 143–154.
39.
TixierRMobasherB (2003)
Modeling of damage in cement-based materials subjected to external sulfate attack. I: Formulation. II: Comparison with experiments. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering15(4): 305–322.
40.
YaoJWChenJKLuCS (2019)
Entropy evolution during crack propagation in concrete under sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials209: 492–498.
41.
YaoJWYangYZChenJK (2020)
A novel chemo-mechanical model for fracture toughness of mortar under sulfate attack. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics109: 102762.
42.
YuLZChenJKSongH (2018)
Experimental and theoretical analyses on the density and modulus development of concrete under continued hydration. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica31(2): 161–173.
43.
YuHFTanYSYangLM (2017)
Microstructural evolution of concrete under the attack of chemical, salt crystallization, and bending stress. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering29(7): 04017041.
44.
ZhangMHChenJKLvYF, et al. (2013)
Study on the expansion of concrete under attack of sulfate and sulfate–chloride ions. Construction and Building Materials39: 26–32.
45.
ZhangJSunMHouD, et al. (2017)
External sulfate attack to reinforced concrete under drying-wetting cycles and loading condition: Numerical simulation and experimental validation by ultrasonic array method. Construction and Building Materials139: 365–373.
46.
ZhangGZWuCHouDS, et al. (2021)
Effect of environmental pH values on phase composition and microstructure of Portland cement paste under sulfate attack. Composites Part B: Engineering216: 108862.
47.
ZhangZYZhouJTYangJ, et al. (2020)
Understanding of the deterioration characteristic of concrete exposed to external sulfate attack: Insight into mesoscopic pore structures. Construction and Building Materials260: 119932.
48.
ZhouS andJu JW (2021)
A chemo-micromechanical damage model of concrete under sulfate attack. International Journal of Damage Mechanics30(8): 1213–1237.
49.
ZuoXBSunWYuC (2012)
Numerical investigation on expansive volume strain in concrete subjected to sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials36: 404–410.
