To resist large deformability demand due to earthquake attack, high-strength concrete (HSC) columns of tall buildings in high seismicity regions are designed to be fully ductile by providing heavy confining steel in the plastic hinge region. However, in areas of low to moderate seismic risks, where the columns are subjected to reduced seismic demand, the same provision of confining steel causes unwanted increase in construction cost (i.e. less cost effective) and embodied energy or carbon level of the structures (i.e. less environmentally friendly). Especially for ultra-HSC columns, the required confining steel will be too large to be provided in the plastic hinge region, which adversely affects the concrete placing quality. To alleviate the problem, a series of experimental tests on HSC columns that contain less confining steel than that of fully ductile columns in the plastic hinge region was carried out to investigate their performance under medium axial load and flexure. From the obtained test results, it was found that these columns perform better than the HSC columns without sufficient confining steel. Also, the drift of these columns can reach about 3% and the respective curvature ductility factors of about 10.
BaeS. and BayrakO. (2008). “Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 290–300.
2.
DaiJ.G.YokotaH. and UedaT. (2009). “A hybrid bonding system for improving the structural performance of FRP flexurally strengthened concrete beams”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 821–832.
3.
DuttaA. and ManderJ.B. (2001). “Energy based methodology for ductile design of concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 12, pp. 1374–1481.
4.
EC2 (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
5.
EllobodyE. and YoungB. (2006). “Design and behaviour of concrete-filled cold-formed stainless steel tube columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 716–728.
6.
FengR. and YoungB. (2010). “Design of concrete-filled stainless steel tubular connections”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 471–492.
7.
HaskettM.OehlersD.J.AliMohamed M.S. and WuC. (2009). “Rigid body moment-rotation mechanism for reinforced concrete beam hinges”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1032–1041.
8.
HaskettM.OehlersD.J. and AliMohamed M.S. (2010). “Design for moment redistribution in RC beams retrofitted with steel plates”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 379–392.
9.
HoJ.C.M. (2003). Inelastic Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams and Limited Ductile High-Strength Concrete Columns, PhD Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
10.
HoJ.C.M. (2010). “Limited ductility design of reinforced concrete columns for tall buildings in low to moderate seismicity regions”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 102–120.
11.
HoJ.C.M.KwanA.K.H. and PamH.J. (2003). “Theoretical analysis of post-peak flexural behaviour of normal- and high-strength concrete beams”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 109–125.
12.
HoJ.C.M.LamJ.Y.K. and KwanA.K.H. (2011). “Effectiveness of adding confinement for ductility improvement of high-strength concrete columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 714–725.
13.
HoJ.C.M. and PamH.J. (2003a). “Influence of transverse steel configuration on post-elastic behaviour of high-strength reinforced concrete columns”, Transactions of the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 1–9.
14.
HoJ.C.M. and PamH.J. (2003b). “Inelastic design of low-axially loaded high-strength reinforced concrete columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1083–1096.
15.
JiangS.F.WuZ.Q. and NiuD.S. (2010). “Experimental study on fire-exposed rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns subjected to bi-axial force and bending”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 551–560.
16.
KwanA.K.H. (2000). “Use of condensed silica fume for making high-strength, self-consolidating concrete”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 620–627.
17.
KwanA.K.H. and HoJ.C.M. (2010). “Ductility design of high-strength concrete beams and columns”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 651–664.
18.
LamJ.Y.K.HoJ.C.M. and KwanA.K.H. (2009a). “Flexural ductility of high-strength concrete columns with minimal confinement”, Materials and Structures, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 909–921.
19.
LamJ.Y.K.HoJ.C.M. and KwanA.K.H. (2009b). “Maximum axial load level and minimum confinement for limited ductility design of concrete columns”, Computers and Concrete, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 357–376.
20.
LamL. and TengJ.G. (2009). “Stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete under cyclic axial compression”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 308–321.
21.
LeeG.Y. and KimW. (2009). “Cracking and tension stiffening behaviour of high-strength concrete tension members subjected to axial load”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 127–137.
22.
LuX. and HsuC.T.T. (2007). “Tangent Poisson's ratio of high-strength concrete in triaxial compression”, Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 69–77.
23.
AliMohamed M.S.OehlersD.J. and GriffithM.C. (2010). “The residual strength of confined concrete”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 613–618.
24.
MirmiranA. and ShahawyM. (1997). “Dilation characteristics of confined concrete”, Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 237–249.
25.
PamH.J. and HoJ.C.M. (2001). “Flexural strength enhancement of confined reinforced concrete columns”, Structures and Buildings, Vol. 146, No. 4, pp. 363–370.
26.
PamH.J. and HoJ.C.M. (2009). “Length of critical region for confinement steel in limited ductility high-strength reinforced concrete columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 2896–2908.
27.
PamH.J.KwanA.K.H. and HoJ.C.M. (2001). “Post-peak behavior and flexural ductility of doubly reinforced normal- and high-strength concrete beams”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 459–474.
28.
ParkR. (1982). “Ductility of square-confined concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 929–950.
29.
ParkR. (2001). “Improving the resistance of structures to earthquakes”, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1–39.
30.
ParkR. and PaulayT. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
31.
PaultreP.LegeronF. and MongeauD. (2001). “Influence of concrete strength and transverse reinforcement yield strength on behaviour of high-strength concrete columns”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 490–501.
32.
SuR.K.L. and WongS.M. (2007a). “Seismic behaviour of slender reinforced concrete shear walls under high axial load ratio”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 957–1965.
33.
SuR.K.L. and WongSM. (2007b). “A survey on axial load ratios of structural walls in medium-rise residential buildings in Hong Kong”, Transactions of Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 40–46.
34.
SuR.K.L.LamW.Y. and PamH.J. (2009). “Experimental study of plate-reinforced composite deep coupling beams”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 235–257.
35.
TsangH.H.SuR.K.L.LamN.T.K. and LoS.H. (2009). “Rapid assessment of seismic demand in existing building structures”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 427–439.
36.
WatsonS.ZahnF.A. and ParkR. (1994). “Confining reinforcement for concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 6, pp. 1799–1824.
37.
WeerheijmJ.MediavillaJ. and van DoormaalJ.C.A.M. (2009). “Explosive loading of multi storey RC buildings: Dynamic response and progressive collapse”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 193–212.
38.
WuY.F.OehlersD.J. and GriffithM.C. (2004). “Rational definition of the flexural deformation capacity of RC column sections”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 641–650.
39.
WuY.F. and WeiY.Y. (2010). “Effects of cross-sectional aspect ratio on the strength of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 32–45.
40.
XuanG.ShahroozB.M.HarriesK.A. and RassatiG.A. (2008). “A performance-based design approach for coupled core wall systems with diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 253–268.
41.
YanZ.H. and AuF.T.K. (2010). “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of frames with plastic hinges at arbitrary locations”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 778–801.
42.
YuT.WongY.L. and TengJ.G. (2010). “Behaviour of hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns subjected to eccentric compression”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 961–974.
43.
ZhaoG.ZhangM. and LiY. (2010). “Strength and behaviour of slender steel reinforced concrete composite columns”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 231–240.
44.
ZhengW.Z. and XieH.Y. (2009). “Experimental research and analysis on encased steel box concrete beams”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 211–230.
45.
ZhuY. and SuR.K.L. (2010). “Seismic behavior of strengthened reinforced concrete coupling beams by bolted steel plates, Part 2: Evaluation of theoretical strength”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 563–580.
