This research experimentally studies coupled hydro-mechanical relationships using flattened Brazilian disks under confinement, with concurrent permeability measurements and acoustic emission monitoring. A series of tests are performed on concrete, as representative samples of brittle geo-materials, under a range of confining stresses between 2.76 and 13.79 MPa. Acoustic emission data is used to quantify damage and identify damage thresholds. Damage is then correlated to pre-peak changes in permeability. The advancement of models that couple transport properties to mechanical responses are of interest in the fields of carbon sequestration, hydrofracking, production of geothermal energy, induced seismicity, and underground nuclear waste storage, and these experiments validate a novel experimental approach towards investigating hydro-mechanical relationships.
BobichJK (2005)
Experimental analysis of the extension to shear fracture transition in Berea sandstone. Texas A&M Univ52.
3.
BruningTKarakusMNguyenGD, et al. (2018)
Experimental study on the damage evolution of brittle rock under triaxial confinement with full circumferential strain control. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering51(11): 3321–3341.
4.
ChangSHLeeCI (2004)
Estimation of cracking and damage mechanisms in rock under triaxial compression by moment tensor analysis of acoustic emission. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences41(7): 1069–1086.
5.
ChoWJKimJSLeeC, et al. (2013)
Gas permeability in the excavation damaged zone at KURT. Engineering Geology164: 222–229.
6.
EberhardtESteadDStimpsonB (1999)
Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences36(3): 361–380.
7.
EberhardtESteadDStimpsonB, et al. (1998)
Identifying crack initiation and propagation thresholds in brittle rock. Canadian Geotechnical Journal35(2): 222–233.
8.
Gutiérrez-MoizantRRamírez-BerasateguiMSantos-CuadrosS, et al. (2018)
Computational verification of the optimum boundary condition of the Brazilian tensile test. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering51(11): 3505–3519.
9.
HatambeigiMChojnickiKTahaMR, et al. (2020)
Visco-inertial gas flow through wellbore cement fractures. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering77: 103275.
10.
HondrosG (1959)
The evaluation of Poisson’s ratio and the modulus of materials of a low tensile resistance by Brazilian (indirect tensile) test with particular reference to concrete. Austrailia J Appl Sci10: 243–268.
11.
HsuBTTCSlateFSturmanGM, et al. (1963)
Microcracking of plain concrete and the shape of the stress-strain curve. ACI J Proc60: 209–224.
12.
HuJMaFWuS (2018)
Comprehensive investigation of leakage problems for concrete gravity dams with penetrating cracks based on detection and monitoring data: A case study. Structural Control and Health Monitoring25(4): e2127.
13.
JaegerJCHoskinsER (1966)
Rock failure under the confined Brazilian test. Journal of Geophysical Research71(10): 2651–2659.
14.
KimJSLeeKSChoWJ, et al. (2015)
A comparative evaluation of stress–strain and acoustic emission methods for quantitative damage assessments of brittle rock. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering48(2): 495–508.
LeiZRougierEKnightEE, et al. (2014)
A framework for grand scale parallelization of the combined finite discrete element method in 2D. Computational Particle Mechanics1(3): 307–319.
17.
LevasseurSCollinFCharlierR, et al. (2013)
A micro-macro approach of permeability evolution in rocks excavation damaged zones. Computers and Geotechnics49: 245–252.
18.
MalekiKPouyaA (2010)
Numerical simulation of damage-permeability relationship in brittle geomaterials. Computers and Geotechnics37(5): 619–628.
19.
MartinCDChandlerNA (1994)
The progressive fracture of Lac du Bonnet granite. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts31(6): 643–659.
20.
MazarsJPijaudier-CabotG (1996)
From damage to fracture mechanics and conversely: A combined approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures33(20-22): 3327–3342.
21.
MunjizaAAndrewsKRFWhiteJK (1999)
Combined single and smeared crack model in combined finite-discrete element analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering44(1): 41–57.
22.
NicksiarMMartinCD (2012)
Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation in compression tests on low-porosity rocks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering45(4): 607–617.
23.
NorrisJQTurcotteDLRundleJB (2015)
A damage model for fracking. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(8): 1227–1238.
24.
PicandetVKhelidjABastianG (2001)
Effect of axial compressive damage on gas permeability of ordinary and high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research31(11): 1525–1532.
25.
Pijaudier-CabotGDufourF andChoinskaM (2009)
Permeability due to the increase of damage in concrete: From diffuse to localized damage distributions. Journal of Engineering Mechanics135(9): 1022–1028.
26.
Pijaudier-CabotGDufourFChoinskaM (2010) Damage and permeability in quasi-brittle materials: From diffuse to localized properties. In: Multiscale Modeling of Heterogenous Materials. New York: Wiley, pp. 277–292.
RamseyJMChesterFM (2004)
Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture. Nature428(6978): 63–66.
29.
RougierEKnightEELeiZ, et al. (2013) HOSS technology overview: Mining.
30.
RougierEKnightEEBroomeST, et al. (2014a)
Validation of a three-dimensional finite-discrete element method using experimental results of the split Hopkinson pressure bar test. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences70: 101–108.
31.
RougierEKnightEELeiZ, et al. (2014b) A software copyright entitled ‘MUNROU-ISF’.
32.
RougierELeiZKnightEE, et al. (2020) Software Copyright C20003 entitled ‘Hybrid optimization software suite - fluid-structure interaction’.
33.
RuschCJ (2018) Correlating damage and air permeability of concrete and brittle rock using the Brazilian indirect tension test.
University of New Mexico.
34.
RutqvistJStephanssonO (2003)
The role of hydrochemical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal11(1): 7–40.
35.
SchulzeOPoppTKernH (2001)
Development of damage and permeability in deforming rock salt. Engineering Geology61(2–3): 163–180.
36.
SouleyMHomandFPepaS, et al. (2001)
Damage-induced permeability changes in granite: A case example at the URL in Canada. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences38(2): 297–310.
37.
SunXHardyHRRaoMAcoustic emission monitoring and analysis procedures utilized during deformation studies on geologic materials. In: SachseWYamaguchiKRogetJ (eds) Acoustic Emission: Current Practice and Future Directions.
West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International, pp.365–380.
38.
TangCAThamLGLeePKK, et al. (2002)
Coupled analysis of flow, stress and damage (FSD) in rock failure. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences39(4): 477–489.
39.
WangQZXingL (1999)
Determination of fracture toughness KIC by using the flattened Brazilian disk specimen for rocks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics64(2): 193–201.
40.
WuSMaJChengYet al. (2018)
Numerical analysis of the flattened Brazilian test: Failure process, recommended geometric parameters and loading conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics204: 288–305.
41.
YaweiLGhassemiA (2018) Rock failure behavior and brittleness under the confined Brazilian test. In: 52nd U.S. rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. Seattle, WA: American Rock Mechanics Association.
42.
ZhangLSoongYDilmoreR, et al. (2015)
Numerical simulation of porosity and permeability evolution of Mount Simon sandstone under geological carbon sequestration conditions. Chemical Geology403: 1–12.
43.
ZhaoXGCaiMWangJ, et al. (2013)
Damage stress and acoustic emission characteristics of the Beishan granite. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences64: 258–269.
44.
ZhouJQHuSHFangS, et al. (2015)
Nonlinear flow behavior at low Reynolds numbers through rough-walled fractures subjected to normal compressive loading. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences80: 202–218.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
