The short beam shear performance of GLARE 3A-3/2 laminates with adhesive layers was investigated by combining the short beam test and the digital image correlation technique. The failure behavior was further analyzed based on finite element simulation and micro failure morphology. The results show an 8% and 58% difference in the short beam strength and bending displacement at failure of laminates along two orthogonal directions; The damage behavior of laminates is determined by the bottom unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) layers. The two typical failure modes are matrix and fiber fracture in the GFRP layer caused by local bending deformation, and interlaminar delamination between GFRP layers; The distribution of surface strain indicates the damage initiation and evolution process. The simulation result of the finite element model established in ABAQUS/Explicit shows consistency with digital image correlation analysis, which provides an effective method to predict the damage behavior of specimens with different ply structures.
AdamsDFLewisEQ (1995)
Experimental study of three- and four-point shear test specimens. J Compos Technol Res17: 9.
2.
Al-AzzawiASMKawashitaLFFeatherstonCA (2019)
A modified cohesive zone model for fatigue delamination in adhesive joints: Numerical and experimental investigations. Composite Structures225: 111114.
3.
BanatDManiaRJ (2020)
Damage analysis of thin-walled GLARE members under axial compression – Numerical and experiment investigations. Composite Structures241: 112102.
4.
BenzeggaghMLKenaneM (1996)
Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Composites Science and Technology56(4): 439–449.
5.
BhatSPatibandlaR (2013)
Examination of small crack normal to multiple elasticity and plasticity mismatched interfaces in residually stressed fiber metal laminate (glare): Theoretical and numerical approaches. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22(3): 405–439.
6.
CamanhoPPDavilaCG (2002) Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737.
7.
ChaiGBManikandanP (2014)
Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates – A review. Composite Structures107: 363–381.
8.
ChenYJiCZhangC, et al. (2019)
Analysis for post-impact tensile-tensile fatigue damage of 2024-T3 sheets based on tests, digital image correlation (DIC) technique and finite element simulation. International Journal of Fatigue122: 125–140.
9.
ChenYSongXJiC, et al. (2021)
Characterizing the damage behavior of thin sheets for fuselage based on in situ corrosion fatigue test and digital image correlation technique. International Journal of Damage Mechanics30(3): 399–414.
10.
Gonzalez-CancheNGFlores-JohnsonEACortesP, et al. (2018)
Evaluation of surface treatments on 5052-H32 aluminum alloy for enhancing the interfacial adhesion of thermoplastic-based fiber metal laminates. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives82: 90–99.
11.
GuanZWCantwellWJAbdullahR (2009)
Numerical modeling of the impact response of fiber–metal laminates. Polymer Composites30(5): 603–611.
12.
GuanMLiuYZhangZ, et al. (2020)
Evaluation of bending performance of carbon fiber-reinforced eucalyptus/poplar composite plywood by digital image correlation and FEA analysis. Journal of Materials Science55(19): 8388–8402.
13.
GuoWXuePYangJ (2013)
Nonlinear progressive damage model for composite laminates used for low-velocity impact. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics34(9): 1145–1154.
14.
HashinZ (1980)
Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics47(2): 329–334.
15.
HeWWangCWangS, et al. (2020)
Characterizing and predicting the tensile mechanical behavior and failure mechanisms of notched FMLs—Combined with DIC and numerical techniques. Composite Structures254: 112893.
16.
HuYZhouJJiF, et al. (2020)
Optimization of preparation technology on fibre metal laminates (FMLs) for high-temperature applications. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture3(4): 317–327.
17.
JakubczakPBieniasJSurowskaB (2018)
Interlaminar shear strength of fibre metal laminates after thermal cycles. Composite Structures206: 876–887.
18.
JiCHuJWangB, et al. (2021)
Mechanical behavior prediction of CF/PEEK-titanium hybrid laminates considering temperature effect by artificial neural network. Composite Structures262: 113367.
19.
JiCWangBHuJ, et al. (2020)
Effect of different preparation methods on mechanical behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK-Titanium hybrid laminates. Polymer Testing85: 106462.
20.
KotikHGIpiñaJE (2019)
Suggested modifications of the ASTM D2344-16 short-beam shear test method to be applied to fiber metal laminates. J Test Eval49: 1213–1221.
21.
KotikHGPerez IpiñaJE (2017)
Short-beam shear fatigue behavior of fiber metal laminate (Glare). International Journal of Fatigue95: 236–242.
22.
KubitATrzepiecinskiTKłonicaM, et al. (2019)
The influence of temperature gradient thermal shock cycles on the interlaminar shear strength of fibre metal laminate composite determined by the short beam test. Composites Part B: Engineering176: 107217.
23.
LiHHuYFuX, et al. (2016)
Effect of adhesive quantity on failure behavior and mechanical properties of fiber metal laminates based on the aluminum–lithium alloy. Composite Structures152: 687–692.
24.
LiLLangLHamzaB, et al. (2020)
The influence of different compositions of fiber metal laminates on the fracture in the semi-solidified stamping forming. Int J Damage Mech. Epub ahead of print 9 September 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1056789520954475.
25.
LiHXuYHuaX, et al. (2018)
Bending failure mechanism and flexural properties of GLARE laminates with different stacking sequences. Composite Structures187: 354–363.
26.
LinYLiuCLiH, et al. (2018)
Interlaminar failure behavior of GLARE laminates under double beam five-point-bending load. Composite Structures201: 79–85.
27.
LiuCDuDLiH, et al. (2016)
Interlaminar failure behavior of GLARE laminates under short-beam three-point-bending load. Composites Part B: Engineering97: 361–367.
28.
LiuHLiuJDingY, et al. (2020)
Modelling damage in fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composite laminates subjected to three-point bend loading. Composite Structures236: 111889.
29.
MrzljakSTrautmannMWagnerG, et al. (2020)
Influence of aluminum surface treatment on tensile and fatigue behavior of thermoplastic-based hybrid laminates. Materials13(14): 3080.
30.
RajanSSuttonMAWehbeR, et al. (2019)
Measured surface deformation and strains in thin thermoplastic prepreg tapes steered along curved paths without adhesion using StereoDIC. Experimental Mechanics59(4): 531–547.
31.
TasdemirBCokerD (2019)
Comparison of damage mechanisms in curved composite laminates under static and fatigue loading. Composite Structures213: 190–203.
32.
WangW (2020)
On the finite width correction factor in prediction models for fatigue crack growth in built-up bonded structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics235: 107156.
33.
WangHLiHXuY, et al. (2021)
Effects of thermal residual stresses on tensile and interlaminar shear behaviors of GLARE laminates. Applied Composite Materials28(3): 877–898.
34.
WangZZhaoJ (2019)
Low velocity impact response of GLARE laminates based on a new efficient implementation of Puck’s criterion. Thin-Walled Structures144: 106321.
35.
WeiLZhuWYuZ, et al. (2019)
A new three-dimensional progressive damage model for fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and its applications to large open-hole panels. Composites Science and Technology182: 107757.
36.
XuMYangYLeiH, et al. (2020)
Dynamic response of fiber metal laminates subjected to localized high impulse blast loading. Composite Structures243: 112216.
37.
ZhangCZhuQCuriel-SosaJL, et al. (2020)
Ballistic performance and damage simulation of fiber metal laminates under high-velocity oblique impact. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(7): 1011–1034.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
