An extensive experimental campaign was run to investigate the influence of the loading direction, stress state (triaxiality ratio ranging from −0.5 to 1), and strain rate (from 10−3 to 1.5x103s−1) on the ductile fracture of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Microscopic and macroscopic observations provided some insight into the shear-driven or micro-voiding-controlled damage mechanisms prevailing at low and high triaxiality ratios, respectively. Numerical simulations were run to determine the local loading paths to fracture in terms of plastic strain as a function of stress triaxiality ratio and Lode parameter. The ductility was found to be anisotropic, but only weakly dependent on the strain rate in the considered range. The anisotropy in ductility was different in tension (maximum along DD) and in compression (maximum along ND). The fracture strain decreased with the absolute value of the triaxiality, with a maximum close to zero. No clear correlation with the Lode parameter was found.
Abu Al-RubRKVoyiadjisGZ (2006)
A finite strain plastic-damage model for high velocity impact using combined viscosity and gradient localization limiters: Part I – Theoretical formulation. International Journal of Damage Mechanics15(4): 293–334.
2.
AllahverdizadehNGilioliAManesA, et al. (2015)
An experimental and numerical study for the damage characterization of a Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences93: 32–47.
3.
AllixO (2012)
The bounded rate concept: A framework to deal with objective failure predictions in dynamic within a local constitutive model. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22(6): 808–826.
4.
BaoYWierzbickiT (2004)
On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences46(1): 81–98.
5.
BaoYWierzbickiT (2005)
On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics72(7): 1049–1069.
6.
BarsoumIFaleskogJ (2007)
Rupture mechanisms in combined tension and shear–Experiments. International Journal of Solids and Structures44(6): 1768–1786.
7.
ChenGRenCLuL, et al. (2018)
Determination of ductile damage behaviors of high strain rate compression deformation for Ti-6Al-4V alloy using experimental-numerical combined approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics200: 499–520.
8.
CogheFTirryWRabetL, et al. (2012)
Importance of twinning in static and dynamic compression of a Ti-6Al-4V titanium 835 alloy with an equiaxed microstructure. Materials Science and Engineering: A537: 1–10.
9.
CouqueH (2003)
A hydrodynamic hat specimen to investigate pressure and strain rate dependence on adiabatic shear band formation. Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings)110: 423–428.
10.
DorothyHLLongèreP (2019)
Unified modelling of adiabatic shear banding and subsequent micro-voiding driven dynamic failure of viscoplastic solids. International Journal of Impact Engineering132: 103322.
11.
DunandMGaryGMohrD (2013)
Load-Inversion device for the high strain rate tensile testing of sheet materials with Hopkinson pressure bars. Experimental Mechanics53(7): 1177–1188.
12.
GiglioMManesAViganoF (2012)
Ductile fracture locus of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences54(1): 121–135.
13.
GrossARavi-ChandarK (2016)
Prediction of ductile failure in Ti–6Al–4V using a local strain-to-failure criterion. International Journal of Fracture198(1–2): 221–245.
14.
HaJBaralMKorkolisYP (2019)
Ductile fracture of an aluminum sheet under proportional loading. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids132: 103685.
15.
HaltomSSKyriakidesSRavi-ChandarK (2013)
Ductile failure under combined shear and tension. International Journal of Solids and Structures50(10): 1507–1522.
16.
HelbertALFeaugasXClavelM (1996)
The influence of stress triaxiality on the damage mechanisms in an equiaxed α/β Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A27(10): 3043–3058.
17.
HfaiedhNRoosABadreddineH, et al. (2018)
Interaction between ductile damage and texture evolution in finite polycrystalline elastoplasticity. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 28(4): 1–21.
18.
HooputraHGeseHDellH, et al. (2004)
A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions. International Journal of Crashworthiness9(5): 449–464.
19.
HuangJGuoYQinD, et al. (2018)
Influence of stress triaxiality on the failure behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under a broad range of strain rates. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics97: 48–61.
20.
JacquesNMercierSMolinariA (2012)
Void coalescence in a porous solid under dynamic loading conditions. International Journal of Fracture173(2): 203–213.
21.
JohnsonGRCookWH (1985)
Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics21(1): 31–48.
22.
KorkolisYPKyriakidesSGiagmourisT, et al. (2010)
Constitutive modeling and rupture predictions of Al-6061-T6 tubes under biaxial loading paths. Journal of Applied Mechanics77: 064501-1–064501-5.
23.
LeeWSLinMT (1997)
The effects of strain rate and temperature on the compressive deformation behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology71(2): 235–246.
24.
LongèrePDragonA (2013)
Description of shear failure in ductile metals via back stress concept linked to damage-microporosity softening. Engineering Fracture Mechanics98: 92–108.
25.
LongèrePDragonA (2015)
Dynamic vs. quasi-static shear failure of high strength metallic alloys: Experimental issues. Mechanics of Materials80: 203–218.
26.
LongèrePDragonA (2016)
Enlarged finite strain modelling incorporating adiabatic shear banding and post-localization microvoiding as shear failure mechanisms. International Journal of Damage Mechanics25(8): 1142–1169.
27.
LongèrePGeffroyAGLebléB, et al. (2012)
Modeling the transition between dense metal and damaged (microporous) metal viscoplasticity. International Journal of Damage Mechanics21(7): 1020–1063.
28.
LSTC (2018) LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore: LSTC.
29.
MeyersMANesterenkoVFLaSalviaJC, et al. (2001)
Shear localization in dynamic deformation of materials: Microstructural evolution and self-organization. Materials Science and Engineering: A317(1–2): 204–225.
30.
PackKRothCC (2016)
The second Sandia Fracture Challenge: Blind prediction of dynamic shear localization and full fracture characterization. International Journal of Fracture198(1–2): 197–220.
31.
PapasideroJDoquetVMohrD (2015)
Ductile fracture of aluminum 2024-T351 under proportional and non-proportional multi-axial loading: Bao–Wierzbicki results revisited. International Journal of Solids and Structures69–70: 459–474.
32.
PeirsJVerleysenPDegrieckJ, et al. (2010)
The use of hat-shaped specimens to study the high strain rate shear behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Impact Engineering37(6): 703–714.
33.
RiceJRTraceyDM (1969)
On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids17(3): 201–217.
34.
RothCCGaryGMohrD (2015)
Compact SHPB system for intermediate and high strain rate plasticity and fracture testing of sheet metal. Experimental Mechanics55(9): 1803–1811.
35.
RothCCMohrD (2018)
Determining the strain to fracture for simple shear for a wide range of sheet metals. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences149: 224–240.
36.
Ruiz de SottoM (2020) Characterization and modeling of the thermo-mechanical behavior of aTi-6Al-4V alloy under dynamic complex loading. PhD Thesis, University of Toulouse, France.
37.
Ruiz de SottoMLongèrePDoquetV, et al. (2020) A constitutive model for a rate and temperature-dependent, plastically anisotropic titanium alloy. International Journal of Plasticity134: 102777.
38.
Tancogne-DejeanTRothCCWoyU, et al. (2016)
Probabilistic fracture of Ti-6Al-4V made through additive layer manufacturing. International Journal of Plasticity78: 45–172.
39.
ViloticDMovrinDAlexandrovS (2016)
A ductile fracture criterion of Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature. Experimental Mechanics57: 59–366.
40.
VoyiadjisGZAbu Al-RubRK (2006)
A finite strain plastic-damage model for high velocity impact using combined viscosity and gradient localization limiters: Part II – Numerical aspects and simulations. International Journal of Damage Mechanics15(4): 335–373.
41.
WangQBruschiSGhiottiA, et al. (2019)
Modelling of fracture occurrence in Ti6Al4V sheets at elevated temperature accounting for anisotropic behaviour. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences150: 471–483.
42.
WierzbickiTBaoYLeeYW, et al. (2005)
Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences47(4–5): 719–743.
43.
ZhangKBadreddineHSaanouniK (2018)
Thermomechanical modeling of distortional hardening fully coupled with ductile damage under non-proportional loading paths. International Journal of Solids and Structures 144–145(145): 123–136.
44.
ZhangKBadreddineHSaanouniK (2020)
Ductile fracture prediction using enhanced CDM model with lode angle-dependency for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology277: 116462.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
