A novel contour integral approach termed Medg is introduced for computation of the surface energy required for the formation of multiple edge cracks. The method is developed by reinterpretation of the conventional M-integral with deliberate delimitation of integration contour and selection of coordinate origin. Due to path independence, this method is efficient, easy to implement by using finite elements, and does not require a complicated mesh around the crack tips for good accuracy. Attention is also addressed to discussion of the size effects on proper interpretation of its physical meaning. The adequacy of the numerical results computed for the finite size corrections has been validated by using some of the available empirical formulations. It is observed that the size effect can be neglected when the crack size remains under one-tenth of the structure size. The results of a specific multi-cracked geotechnical structure suggest that, the damage state such as degradation of the structural stiffness due to the presence of edge cracks can be properly inspected by using Medg.
AhmadzadehGRVarvani-FarahaniA (2019)
Energy-based damage descriptions to assess fatigue life of steel samples undergoing various multiaxial loading spectra. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(1): 35–57.
BuecknerHF (1971)
Weight functions for the notched bar. ZAMM—Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics51: 97–109.
4.
ChangJHChienAJ (2002)
Evaluation of M-Integral for anisotropic elastic media with multiple defects. International Journal of Fracture114: 267–289.
5.
ChangJHHuangYJ (2017)
Surface energy for formation of inclined/interface cracks terminating at a bimaterial interface. ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics143: 04017091-1–04017091-9.
6.
ChangJHLinJS (2007)
Surface energy for creation of multiple curved cracks in rubbery materials. ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics74: 488–496.
7.
ChangJHLiuDY (2009)
Damage assesssment for 2-D multi-cracked materials/structures by using Mc-integral. ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics135: 1100–1107.
ChenYH (2001)
M-integral analysis for two-dimensional solids with strongly interacting microcracks. Part I: In an infinite brittle solid. International Journal of Solid Structures38:3193–3212.
10.
Dauzats M and Rampal A (1987) Mechanisms of surface cracking in pavement wearing courses. In: 6th International Conference, Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Volume I, Proceedings; pp. 232–247.
11.
FettT (1998)
Stress intensity factors for edge cracked plates under arbitrary loading. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures22: 301–305.
HerrmannAGHerrmannG (1981)
On energy release rates for a plane crack. Journal of Applied Mechanics48: 525–528.
14.
HajikazemiMMcCartneyLN (2018)
Comparison of variational and generalized plane strain approaches for matrix cracking in general symmetric laminates. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(4): 507–540.
15.
Himeno K, Kamijima T, Ikeda T, et al. (1997) Distribution of tire contact pressure of vehicles and its influence on pavement distress. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavement 1: 129–139.
16.
HuYFChenYH (2009)
M-integral description for a strip with two holes before and after coalescence. Acta Mechanica204: 109–120.
17.
HuangYHYangSQ (2019)
Mechanical and cracking behavior of granite containing two coplanar flaws under conventional triaxial compression. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(4): 590–610.
18.
JuhászZTurcsánTTóthTB, et al. (2018)
Sensitivity analysis for frequency based prediction of crack size in composite plates with through-the-width delamination. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(6): 859–876.
19.
KeerLMFreedmanJM (1973)
Tensile strip with edge cracks. International Journal of Engineering Science11: 1265–1275.
20.
LiQHuYFChenYH (2013)
On the physical interpretation of the M-integral in nonlinear elastic defect mechanics. International Journal of Damage Mechanics22: 602–613.
21.
LiSWangMJeanmeureL, et al. (2019)
Damage related material constants in continuum damage mechanics for unidirectional composites with matrix cracks. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(5): 690–707.
22.
LiuJZWuXR (1997)
Analytical expressions for crack opening displacements of edge cracked specimens under a segment of uniform crack face pressure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics58: 107–119.
23.
LvJZhuWLiQ (2019)
Damage evaluation for the dispersed microdefects with the aid of M-integral. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(5): 647–663.
24.
MajidiHRAyatollahiMRTorabiAR, et al. (2019)
Energy-based assessment of brittle fracture in VO-notched polymer specimens under combined compression-shear loading conditions. International Journal of Damage Mechanics28(5): 664–689.
25.
Nisitani H and Mori K (1987) Influence of supporting conditions of stress intensity factors for single-edge-cracked specimens under bending. NASA Technical Paper-20016.
26.
OkabeTOnoderaSKumagaiY, et al. (2018)
Continuum damage mechanics modeling of composite laminates including transverse cracks. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(6): 877–895.
27.
TongDHWuXR (2014)
Analysis of crack opening stresses for center- and edge-crack tension specimens. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics27: 291–298.
28.
TsudrovINovakJ (2004)
Effective elastic properties of solids with two-dimensional inclusions of irregular shapes. International Journal of Solid Structures41: 6905–6924.
29.
ZhangXGaoHHuangHZ (2018)
Total fatigue life prediction for welded joints based on initial and equivalent crack size determination. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(7): 1084–1104.
30.
ZhaoYYangTXuT, et al. (2018)
Mechanical and energy release characteristics of different water-bearing sandstones under uniaxial compression. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(5): 640–656.
