Concrete structures in cold regions are exposed to cyclic freezing and thawing environment, leading to degraded mechanical and fracture properties of concrete due to microstructural damage. While the X-ray micro-/nano-computed tomography technology has been implemented to directly observe concrete microstructure and characterize local damage in recent years, the freeze-thawed damage evolution processes and its effect on overall mechanical performance are not well understood. In this paper, the X-ray nano-computed tomography technology and micro-scale cohesive zone model are combined to quantitatively investigate microstructural damage evolution and its effect on fracture behavior of freeze-thawed concrete samples in three-point bending tests. A two-level micro-to-macro scale finite element model is developed based on computed tomography microstructural images with microcracks due to freeze-thaw cycles. The macroscopic load–deflection curves and fracture energies are simulated and compared favorably with experimental results. Simulation results demonstrate that microcracks caused by freeze-thaw actions are the primary reason for degradation of concrete mechanical properties. Fracture behaviors of frost-damaged concrete with different mortar and interfacial transition zone strength and fracture constants are also simulated and discussed. The combined X-ray nano-computed tomography technology and cohesive zone model proposed is effective in characterizing fracture behavior of concrete and capturing freeze-thaw cycle-induced microstructural damage evolution and its effect on fracture process of concrete.
BasheerLBasheerPLongA (2005) Influence of coarse aggregate on the permeation, durability and the microstructure characteristics of ordinary Portland cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials19(9): 682–690.
2.
BažantZPYuQ (2011) Size-effect testing of cohesive fracture parameters and nonuniqueness of work-of-fracture method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics137(8): 580–588.
3.
ChenFLQiaoPZ (2015) Probabilistic damage modeling and service-life prediction of concrete under freeze–thaw action. Materials and Structures48(8): 2697–2711.
4.
DamianiRSunLZ (2017) Microstructural characterization and effective viscoelastic behavior of magnetorheological elastomers with varying acetone contents. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(1): 104–118.
5.
DesmoratR (2016) Anisotropic damage modeling of concrete materials. International Journal of Damage Mechanics25(6): 818–852.
6.
EnfedaqueARomeroHLGálvezJC (2014) Fracture energy evolution of two concretes resistant to the action of freeze-thaw cycles. Materiales de Construcción64(313): e005, 1–12. . DOI: 10.3989/mc.2014.00813.
7.
GuXLHongLWangZLet al.(2013) A modified rigid-body-spring concrete model for prediction of initial defects and aggregates distribution effect on behavior of concrete. Computational Materials Science77: 355–365.
8.
HuangYJYanDMYangZJet al.(2016) 2D and 3D homogenization and fracture analysis of concrete based on in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography images and Monte Carlo simulations. Engineering Fracture Mechanics163: 37–54.
9.
HuangYJYangZJRenWYet al.(2015) 3D meso-scale fracture modelling and validation of concrete based on in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography images using damage plasticity model. International Journal of Solids and Structures67–68: 340–352.
10.
Kosior-KazberukM (2013) Variations in fracture energy of concrete subjected to cyclic freezing and thawing. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering13(2): 254–259.
11.
LabandaNAGiustiSMLuccioniBM (2016) Meso-scale fracture simulation using an augmented Lagrangian approach. International Journal of Damage Mechanics27(1): 138–175.
12.
LeeKParkJ (2008) A numerical model for elastic modulus of concrete considering interfacial transition zone. Cement and Concrete Research38(3): 396–402.
13.
LinLQWangXQZengXW (2017) The role of cohesive zone properties on intergranular to transgranular fracture transition in polycrystalline solids. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(3): 379–394.
14.
LópezCMCarolIAguadoA (2008) Meso-structural study of concrete fracture using interface elements. I: numerical model and tensile behavior. Materials and Structures41(3): 583–599.
15.
LuoQLiuDXQiaoPZet al.(2018) Microstructural damage characterization of concrete under freeze-thaw action. International Journal of Damage Mechanics. . DOI:10.1177/1056789517736573.
16.
LutzMPMonteiroPJMZimmermanRW (1997) Inhomogeneous interfacial transition zone model for the bulk modulus of mortar. Cement and Concrete Research27(7): 1113–1122.
17.
MaZMZhaoTJYangJ (2017) Fracture behavior of concrete exposed to the freeze-thaw environment. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering29(8): 04017071-1-10. . DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001901.
18.
ManHVan MierJGM (2011) Damage distribution and size effect in numerical concrete from lattice analyses. Cement & Concrete Composites33(9): 867–880.
19.
ObaraYTanikuraIJungJet al.(2016) Evaluation of micro-damage of concrete specimens under cyclic uniaxial loading by X-ray CT method. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology14(8): 433–443.
20.
QiaoPZChenFL (2013) Cohesive fracture and probabilistic damage analysis of freezing-thawing degradation of concrete. Construction and Building Materials47: 879–887.
21.
Qiao PZ, McLean DI and Chen FL (2012) Concrete Performance Using Low-Degradation Aggregates. Report. Washington State Transportation Center Report no. WA-RD 790, Washington State, Department of Transportation, Transportation Building, MS: 7372, Olympia, WA 98504-7372, USA, June 2012.
22.
QiaoPZXuYW (2004) Evaluation of fracture energy of composite-concrete bonded interfaces using three-point bend tests. Journal of Composites for Construction8(4): 352–359.
23.
RenWYYangZJSharmaRet al.(2015) Two-dimensional X-ray CT image based meso-scale fracture modelling of concrete. Engineering Fracture Mechanics133: 24–39.
24.
RILEM (1985) Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams. Materials and Structures18(106): 285–290.
25.
RothSLégerPSoula ManiA (2015) A combined XFEM–damage mechanics approach for concrete crack propagation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering283: 923–955.
26.
SicatEGongFYUedaTet al.(2014) Experimental investigation of the deformational behavior of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in concrete during freezing and thawing cycles. Construction and Building Materials65: 122–131.
27.
SkarzynskiŁNitkaMTejchmanJ (2015) Modelling of concrete fracture at aggregate level using FEM and DEM based on X-ray mu CT images of internal structure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics147: 13–35.
28.
SunBLiZX (2016) Adaptive concurrent three-level multiscale simulation for trans-scale process from material mesodamage to structural failure of concrete structures. International Journal of Damage Mechanics25(5): 750–769.
29.
SuzukiTShiotaniTOhtsuM (2017) Evaluation of cracking damage in freeze-thawed concrete using acoustic emission and X-ray CT image. Construction and Building Materials136: 619–626.
30.
TianWHanN (2016) Evaluation of damage in concrete suffered freeze-thaw cycles by CT technique. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology14(11): 679–690.
31.
TrawińskiWBobińskiJTejchmanJ (2016) Two-dimensional simulations of concrete fracture at aggregate level with cohesive elements based on X-ray μCT images. Engineering Fracture Mechanics168: 204–226.
32.
WangXFYangZJJivkovAP (2015) Monte Carlo simulations of mesoscale fracture of concrete with random aggregates and pores: a size effect study. Construction and Building Materials80: 262–272.
33.
WardehMAToutanjiHA (2017) Parameter estimation of an anisotropic damage model for concrete using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(6): 801–825.
34.
YuanJLiuYLiHXet al.(2016) Experimental investigation of the variation of concrete pores under the action of freeze-thaw cycles by using X-ray CT. Procedia Engineering161: 583–588.
35.
ZhouSZhuHHJuJWet al.(2017) Modeling microcapsule-enabled self-healing cementitious composite materials using discrete element method. International Journal of Damage Mechanics26(2): 340–357.
