In this work, a multiscale model based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique is applied to describe the mechanical behavior of porous materials. The effects of the microstructures (such as pore shape, number, size, distribution and orientation) on the overall strength of the porous medium and its microstress distribution are fully studied. The elastoplastic model is further extended by including a damage process. The influences of microstructure on the damage evolution of the porous medium are discussed and illustrated numerically. Then the proposed multiscale damage model is applied to study the macroscopic behavior of porous sandstone. According to the microstructure of the studied material, a representative elementary volume with randomly distributed spherical pores is considered. The solid phase of the sandstone is assumed to obey the Drucker–Prager criterion. Taking advantage of the FFT-based method, the evolution of generated damage is clearly illustrated during the loading process at the microscopic level. Comparisons between numerical results and experimental data show the efficiency of the proposed numerical model.
AnoukouKPastorFDufrenoyPet al. (2016) Limit analysis and homogenization of porous materials with Mohr–Coulomb matrix. Part I: Theoretical formulation. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids91: 145–171.
2.
BenzergaABessonJPineauA (1999) Coalescence-controlled anisotropic ductile fracture. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology121(2): 221–229.
3.
BesuellePDesruesJRaynaudS (2000) Experimental characterisation of the localisation phenomenon inside a vosges sandstone in a triaxial cell. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences37(8): 1223–1237.
4.
BilgerNAuslenderFBornertMet al. (2005) Effect of a nonuniform distribution of voids on the plastic response of voided materials: a computational and statistical analysis. International Journal of Solids and Structures42(2): 517–538.
5.
CazacuOStewartJB (2009) Analytic plastic potential for porous aggregates with matrix exhibiting tension-compression asymmetry. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids57(2): 325–341.
6.
ChengLDe SaxceGKondoD (2014) A stress-based variational model for ductile porous materials. International Journal of Plasticity55: 133–151.
7.
DurbanDCohenTHollanderY (2010) Plastic response ofporous solids with pressure sensitive matrix. Mechanics Research Communications37(7): 636–641.
8.
EyreDJMiltonGW (1999) A fast numerical scheme for computing the response of composites using grid refinement. The European Physical Journal Applied Physics6(1): 41–47.
9.
FritzenFForestSBöhlkeTet al. (2012) Computational homogenization of elasto-plastic porous metals. International Journal of Plasticity29: 102–119.
10.
GarajeuMSuquetP (1997) Effective properties of porous ideally plastic or viscoplastic materials containing rigid particles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids45(6): 873–902.
11.
GologanuMLeblondJDevauxJ (1993) Approximate models for ductiles metals containing non-spherical voids – case of axisymmetric prolate ellipsoidal cavities. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids41(11): 1723–1754.
12.
GologanuMLeblondJDevauxJ (1994) Approximate models for ductile metals containing non-spherical voids–cas of axisymmetric oblate ellipsoidal cavities. ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology116(3): 290–297.
13.
GologanuMLeblondJPerrinGet al. (1997) Recent extensions of gurson’s model for porous ductile metals. Continuum Micromechanics377: 61–130.
14.
GuoTFaleskogJShihC (2008) Continuum modeling of a porous solid with pressure-sensitive dilatant matrix. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids56(6): 2188–2212.
15.
GursonA (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part1-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology99(1): 2–15.
16.
JeongH (2002) A new yield function and a hydrostatic stress-controlled model for porous solids with pressure-sensitive matrices. International Journal of Solids and Structures39(5): 1385–1403.
17.
JiangTShaoJF (2012) Micromechanical analysis of the nonlinear behavior of porous geomaterials based on the fast fourier transform. Computers and Geotechnics46: 69–74.
18.
KachanovM (1994) Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems. Advances in Applied Mechanics30: 259–445.
19.
KeralavarmaSBenzergaA (2010) A constitutive model for plastically anisotropic solids with non-spherical voids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids58(6): 874–901.
20.
LeblondJPerrinGSuquetP (1994) Exact results and approximate models for porous viscoplastic solids. International Journal of Plasticity10(3): 213–235.
21.
LeeJOungJ (2000) Yield functions and flow rules for porous pressure-dependent strain-hardening polymeric materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics67(2): 288–297.
22.
MaghousSDormieuxLBarthèlèmyJ (2009) Micromechanical approach to the strength properties of frictional geomaterials. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solid28(1): 179–188.
23.
MenendezBZhuWWongTF (1996) Micromechanics of brittle faulting and cataclastic flow in berea sandstone. Journal of Structural Geology18(1): 1–16.
24.
MichelJCSuquetP (1992) The constitutive law of nonlinear viscous and porous materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids40(4): 783–812.
25.
MichelJCMoulinecHSuquetP (1999) Effective properties of composite materials with periodic microstructure: a computational approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering172(1): 109–143.
26.
MichelJCMoulinecHSuquetP (2000) A computational method based on augmented lagrangians and fast fourier transforms for composites with high contrast. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences1(2): 79–88.
27.
MichelJCMoulinecHSuquetP (2001) A computational scheme for linear and non-linear composites with arbitrary phase contrast. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering52(1): 139–160.
28.
MonchietVBonnetG (2012) A polarization-based fft iterative scheme for computing the effective properties of elastic composites with arbitrary contrast. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering89(11): 1419–1436.
29.
MonchietVKondoD (2012) Exact solution of a plastic hollow sphere with a mises-schleicher matrix. International Journal of Engineering Sciences51: 168–178.
30.
MonchietVCazacuOCharkalukEet al. (2008) Macroscopic yield criteria for plastic anisotropic materials containing spheroidal voids. International Journal of Plasticity24(7): 1158–1189.
31.
MonchietVCharkalukEKondoD (2014) Macroscopic yield criteria for ductile materials containing spheroidal voids: An eshelby-like velocity fields approach. Mechanics of Materials72: 1–18.
32.
MorinLLeblondJBBenzergaandAAet al. (2016) A unified criterion for the growth and coalescence of microvoids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids97: 19–36. .
33.
MorinLLeblondJBKondoD (2015) A gurson-type criterion for plastically anisotropic solids containing arbitrary ellipsoidal voids. International Journal of Solids and Structures77: 86–101.
34.
MoulinecHSuquetP (1994) A fast numerical method for computing the linear and nonlinear mechanical properties of composites. Comptes rendus de l’academie des sciencest.318, Serie II: 1417–1423.
35.
MoulinecHSuquetP (1998) A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering157(1): 69–94.
36.
PardoenTHutchinsonJ (2003) Micromechanics-based model for trends in toughness of ductile metals. Acta Materialia51(1): 133–148.
37.
Ponte CastanedaP (1991) The effective mechanical properties of nonlinear isotropic composites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids39(1): 45–71.
38.
ShenWHeZDormieuxLet al. (2014a) Effective strength of saturated double porous media with a drucker-prager solid phase. International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics38(3): 281–296.
39.
ShenWLanoyeEDormieuxLet al. (2014b) Homogenization of saturated double porous media with eshelby-like velocity field. Acta Geophysica62(5): 1146–1162.
40.
ShenWOueslatiADe SaxceG (2015a) Macroscopic criterion for ductile porous materials based on a statically admissible microscopic stress field. International Journal of Plasticity70: 60–76.
41.
ShenWPastorFKondoD (2013) Improved criteria for ductile porous materials having a green type matrix by using eshelby-like velocity fields. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics67-68: 14–21.
42.
ShenWShaoJKondoDet al. (2015b) A new macroscopic criterion of porous materials with a Mises–Schleicher compressible matrix. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids49: 531–538.
43.
ShenWQLinJZhuQZet al. (2011) Macroscopic yield criterion for ductile materials containing randomly oriented spheroidal cavities. International Journal of Damage Mechanics20(8): 1198–1216.
44.
ShenWQShaoJFDormieuxLet al. (2012) Approximate criteria for ductile porous materials having a green type matrix: Application to double porous media. Computational Materials Science62: 189–194.
45.
SunYWangD (1989) A lower bound approach to the yield loci of porous materials. Acta Mechanica5(3): 237–243.
46.
TvergaardV (1981) Influence of voids on shear bands instabilities under plane strain conditions. International Journal of Fracture17(4): 389–407.
47.
TvergaardV (1982) Material failure by void coalescence in localized shear bands. International Journal of Solids and Structures18(8): 659–672.
